使用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗肿瘤的多发性硬化症患者的神经系统预后。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000210003
Carson M Quinn, Prashanth Rajarajan, Alexander J Gill, Hannah Kopinsky, Andrew B Wolf, Celeste Soares de Camargo, Jessica Lamb, Tamar E Bacon, Joseph C Murray, John C Probasco, Kristin M Galetta, Daniel Kantor, Patricia Coyle, Vikram Bhise, Enrique Alvarez, Sarah E Conway, Shamik Bhattacharyya, Ilya Kister
{"title":"使用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗肿瘤的多发性硬化症患者的神经系统预后。","authors":"Carson M Quinn, Prashanth Rajarajan, Alexander J Gill, Hannah Kopinsky, Andrew B Wolf, Celeste Soares de Camargo, Jessica Lamb, Tamar E Bacon, Joseph C Murray, John C Probasco, Kristin M Galetta, Daniel Kantor, Patricia Coyle, Vikram Bhise, Enrique Alvarez, Sarah E Conway, Shamik Bhattacharyya, Ilya Kister","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used against various cancers but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Risk of irAEs may be higher in patients with certain preexisting autoimmune diseases, and these patients may also experience exacerbation of the underlying autoimmune disease following ICI initiation. People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have mostly been excluded from clinical trials of ICIs, so data on the safety of ICIs in MS are limited. This study aims to assess the rate of MS activity, as well as neurologic and nonneurologic irAEs in persons with MS treated with ICIs for cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participating sites were invited to this retrospective observational study through the Medical Partnership 4 MS+ listserv. Seven large academic centers participated in the study, each conducting a systematic search of their electronic medical record system for patients with MS and history of ICI treatment. The participating neurologist reviewed each chart individually to ensure the inclusion criteria were met. Demographics and data on MS and cancer history, treatments, and outcomes were abstracted from patient charts using a structured instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 66 people with MS (median age 66 years, 73% female, 68% not on disease-modifying therapy for MS) who were treated with ICIs for lung cancer (35%), melanoma (21%), or another oncologic indication. During post-ICI follow-up (median: 11.7 months, range 0.2-106.3 months), 2 patients (3%) had relapse or MRI activity, 3 (5%) had neurologic irAEs, and 21 (32%) had nonneurologic irAEs. At the last follow-up, 25 (38%) participants had partial or complete remission of their cancer, while 35 (53%) were deceased.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this multi-institutional systematic retrospective study of predominantly older patients with MS, most of whom were not on disease-modifying therapy, MS activity and neurologic irAEs following ICI treatment were rare. These data suggest that preexisting MS should not preclude the use of ICIs for cancer in older patients, but the results may not be generalizable to younger patients with active MS. Prospective studies of ICI safety that enroll younger patients with MS are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"103 11","pages":"e210003"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurologic Outcomes in People With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Oncologic Indications.\",\"authors\":\"Carson M Quinn, Prashanth Rajarajan, Alexander J Gill, Hannah Kopinsky, Andrew B Wolf, Celeste Soares de Camargo, Jessica Lamb, Tamar E Bacon, Joseph C Murray, John C Probasco, Kristin M Galetta, Daniel Kantor, Patricia Coyle, Vikram Bhise, Enrique Alvarez, Sarah E Conway, Shamik Bhattacharyya, Ilya Kister\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used against various cancers but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Risk of irAEs may be higher in patients with certain preexisting autoimmune diseases, and these patients may also experience exacerbation of the underlying autoimmune disease following ICI initiation. People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have mostly been excluded from clinical trials of ICIs, so data on the safety of ICIs in MS are limited. This study aims to assess the rate of MS activity, as well as neurologic and nonneurologic irAEs in persons with MS treated with ICIs for cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participating sites were invited to this retrospective observational study through the Medical Partnership 4 MS+ listserv. Seven large academic centers participated in the study, each conducting a systematic search of their electronic medical record system for patients with MS and history of ICI treatment. The participating neurologist reviewed each chart individually to ensure the inclusion criteria were met. Demographics and data on MS and cancer history, treatments, and outcomes were abstracted from patient charts using a structured instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 66 people with MS (median age 66 years, 73% female, 68% not on disease-modifying therapy for MS) who were treated with ICIs for lung cancer (35%), melanoma (21%), or another oncologic indication. During post-ICI follow-up (median: 11.7 months, range 0.2-106.3 months), 2 patients (3%) had relapse or MRI activity, 3 (5%) had neurologic irAEs, and 21 (32%) had nonneurologic irAEs. At the last follow-up, 25 (38%) participants had partial or complete remission of their cancer, while 35 (53%) were deceased.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this multi-institutional systematic retrospective study of predominantly older patients with MS, most of whom were not on disease-modifying therapy, MS activity and neurologic irAEs following ICI treatment were rare. These data suggest that preexisting MS should not preclude the use of ICIs for cancer in older patients, but the results may not be generalizable to younger patients with active MS. Prospective studies of ICI safety that enroll younger patients with MS are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology\",\"volume\":\"103 11\",\"pages\":\"e210003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)越来越多地用于抗击各种癌症,但也与免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)有关。患有某些原有自身免疫性疾病的患者发生 irAEs 的风险可能更高,而且这些患者在开始使用 ICI 后,潜在的自身免疫性疾病也可能会加重。多发性硬化症(MS)患者大多被排除在 ICIs 临床试验之外,因此有关 ICIs 在 MS 中安全性的数据非常有限。本研究旨在评估使用 ICIs 治疗癌症的多发性硬化症患者的多发性硬化症活动率以及神经系统和非神经系统 IRAEs:通过医学合作 4 MS+ 列表服务器邀请参与研究的机构参加这项回顾性观察研究。七个大型学术中心参与了这项研究,每个中心都对其电子病历系统中的多发性硬化症患者和 ICI 治疗史进行了系统搜索。参与研究的神经科医生逐一审查每份病历,以确保符合纳入标准。使用结构化工具从患者病历中抽取人口统计学和多发性硬化症及癌症病史、治疗和结果数据:我们发现66名多发性硬化症患者(中位年龄66岁,73%为女性,68%未接受多发性硬化症疾病修饰治疗)曾因肺癌(35%)、黑色素瘤(21%)或其他肿瘤适应症接受过ICI治疗。在ICI治疗后的随访期间(中位数:11.7个月,范围0.2-106.3个月),2名患者(3%)出现复发或磁共振成像活动,3名患者(5%)出现神经系统异常反应,21名患者(32%)出现非神经系统异常反应。在最后一次随访中,有25人(38%)的癌症得到部分或完全缓解,35人(53%)死亡:讨论:在这项多机构系统回顾性研究中,研究对象主要是老年多发性硬化症患者,其中大多数患者未接受疾病改变疗法,ICI 治疗后多发性硬化症活动和神经系统非器质性损伤非常罕见。这些数据表明,老年多发性硬化症患者在使用 ICIs 治疗癌症时不应排除原有的多发性硬化症,但这些结果可能并不适用于年轻的活动性多发性硬化症患者。我们需要对年轻的多发性硬化症患者进行 ICI 安全性的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurologic Outcomes in People With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Oncologic Indications.

Background and objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used against various cancers but are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Risk of irAEs may be higher in patients with certain preexisting autoimmune diseases, and these patients may also experience exacerbation of the underlying autoimmune disease following ICI initiation. People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have mostly been excluded from clinical trials of ICIs, so data on the safety of ICIs in MS are limited. This study aims to assess the rate of MS activity, as well as neurologic and nonneurologic irAEs in persons with MS treated with ICIs for cancer.

Methods: Participating sites were invited to this retrospective observational study through the Medical Partnership 4 MS+ listserv. Seven large academic centers participated in the study, each conducting a systematic search of their electronic medical record system for patients with MS and history of ICI treatment. The participating neurologist reviewed each chart individually to ensure the inclusion criteria were met. Demographics and data on MS and cancer history, treatments, and outcomes were abstracted from patient charts using a structured instrument.

Results: We identified 66 people with MS (median age 66 years, 73% female, 68% not on disease-modifying therapy for MS) who were treated with ICIs for lung cancer (35%), melanoma (21%), or another oncologic indication. During post-ICI follow-up (median: 11.7 months, range 0.2-106.3 months), 2 patients (3%) had relapse or MRI activity, 3 (5%) had neurologic irAEs, and 21 (32%) had nonneurologic irAEs. At the last follow-up, 25 (38%) participants had partial or complete remission of their cancer, while 35 (53%) were deceased.

Discussion: In this multi-institutional systematic retrospective study of predominantly older patients with MS, most of whom were not on disease-modifying therapy, MS activity and neurologic irAEs following ICI treatment were rare. These data suggest that preexisting MS should not preclude the use of ICIs for cancer in older patients, but the results may not be generalizable to younger patients with active MS. Prospective studies of ICI safety that enroll younger patients with MS are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信