中性粒细胞胞外陷阱在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌新辅助化疗中的预测价值

IF 3 2区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Bingqing Shang, Zhilong Hu, Ruiyang Xie, Jie Wu, Wang Qu, Wen Zhang, Aiping Zhou, Lin Feng, Xingang Bi, Jianzhong Shou
{"title":"中性粒细胞胞外陷阱在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌新辅助化疗中的预测价值","authors":"Bingqing Shang, Zhilong Hu, Ruiyang Xie, Jie Wu, Wang Qu, Wen Zhang, Aiping Zhou, Lin Feng, Xingang Bi, Jianzhong Shou","doi":"10.1002/mc.23844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the recommended therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, the efficacy of MIBC for chemotherapy is only about 40%. Therefore, predictors of therapy response are urgently needed. Neutrophils form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), a network structure, and growing evidence indicated that it could be a prognostic and predictive marker in cancer. In MIBC, the predictive role of NETs in chemotherapy resistance is unclear. We used the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression analyses to develop a NETs-associated signature score (NETs-score) for therapeutic response prediction in the discovery cohort (GSE169455). Then the NETs score-based risk stratification was verified in two validation cohorts (Taber et al.'s cohort, our institutional cohort). In the training cohort, high NETs-score was associated with poor chemotherapy response (AUC = 0.781) and reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.26-3.40], p = 0.003) in MIBC patients. The NETs-score was also demonstrated to be a predictive factor for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.731). The accuracy of the NETs-score was superior to other chemotherapy response predictors such as Ba/Sq expression subtype (AUC = 0.711), BRCA2 mutation (AUC = 0.692) and ERCC2 mutation (AUC = 0.548). Furthermore, in our center cohort, the expression level of H3Cit showed a significant difference between the response and no-response group (p = 0.01). Through immunohistochemical validation, NETs was an independent predictor of MIBC neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy as determined by the multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR = 5.94, 95% CI: 1.20-45.50, p = 0.045). Patients with high levels of NETs predicted poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study was the first to reveal the correlation between the level of NETs in MIBC and the efficacy of chemotherapy, which may provide a theoretical basis regarding NETs inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19003,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Carcinogenesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Value of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Bingqing Shang, Zhilong Hu, Ruiyang Xie, Jie Wu, Wang Qu, Wen Zhang, Aiping Zhou, Lin Feng, Xingang Bi, Jianzhong Shou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mc.23844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the recommended therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, the efficacy of MIBC for chemotherapy is only about 40%. Therefore, predictors of therapy response are urgently needed. Neutrophils form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), a network structure, and growing evidence indicated that it could be a prognostic and predictive marker in cancer. In MIBC, the predictive role of NETs in chemotherapy resistance is unclear. We used the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression analyses to develop a NETs-associated signature score (NETs-score) for therapeutic response prediction in the discovery cohort (GSE169455). Then the NETs score-based risk stratification was verified in two validation cohorts (Taber et al.'s cohort, our institutional cohort). In the training cohort, high NETs-score was associated with poor chemotherapy response (AUC = 0.781) and reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.26-3.40], p = 0.003) in MIBC patients. The NETs-score was also demonstrated to be a predictive factor for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.731). The accuracy of the NETs-score was superior to other chemotherapy response predictors such as Ba/Sq expression subtype (AUC = 0.711), BRCA2 mutation (AUC = 0.692) and ERCC2 mutation (AUC = 0.548). Furthermore, in our center cohort, the expression level of H3Cit showed a significant difference between the response and no-response group (p = 0.01). Through immunohistochemical validation, NETs was an independent predictor of MIBC neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy as determined by the multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR = 5.94, 95% CI: 1.20-45.50, p = 0.045). Patients with high levels of NETs predicted poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study was the first to reveal the correlation between the level of NETs in MIBC and the efficacy of chemotherapy, which may provide a theoretical basis regarding NETs inhibitors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Carcinogenesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Carcinogenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.23844\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Carcinogenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.23844","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

顺铂化疗是治疗肌浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的推荐疗法。然而,肌层浸润性膀胱癌的化疗有效率仅为 40%。因此,迫切需要预测治疗反应的指标。中性粒细胞会形成中性粒细胞胞外陷阱(NET),这是一种网络结构,越来越多的证据表明它可以作为癌症的预后和预测标志物。在MIBC中,NETs对化疗耐药的预测作用尚不明确。我们在发现队列(GSE169455)中使用最小绝对缩减和选择操作符(LASSO)逻辑回归分析法建立了NETs相关特征得分(NETs-score),用于预测治疗反应。然后在两个验证队列(Taber 等人的队列和本机构的队列)中验证了基于 NETs 评分的风险分层。在训练队列中,NETs 高分与化疗反应差(AUC = 0.781)和无复发生存率(RFS)降低(危险比 [HR] = 2.07,95% 置信区间 [CI]:[1.26-3.40])相关:[1.26-3.40], p = 0.003)。在验证队列中,NETs-评分也被证明是新辅助化疗疗效的预测因素(AUC = 0.731)。NETs-score的准确性优于其他化疗反应预测因子,如Ba/Sq表达亚型(AUC = 0.711)、BRCA2突变(AUC = 0.692)和ERCC2突变(AUC = 0.548)。此外,在我们中心的队列中,H3Cit的表达水平在有反应组和无反应组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.01)。通过免疫组化验证,多变量逻辑回归分析表明,NETs 是 MIBC 新辅助化疗疗效的独立预测因子(OR = 5.94,95% CI:1.20-45.50,p = 0.045)。NET水平高的患者对新辅助化疗的反应较差。该研究首次揭示了MIBC中NETs水平与化疗疗效之间的相关性,为NETs抑制剂提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Value of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the recommended therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, the efficacy of MIBC for chemotherapy is only about 40%. Therefore, predictors of therapy response are urgently needed. Neutrophils form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), a network structure, and growing evidence indicated that it could be a prognostic and predictive marker in cancer. In MIBC, the predictive role of NETs in chemotherapy resistance is unclear. We used the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression analyses to develop a NETs-associated signature score (NETs-score) for therapeutic response prediction in the discovery cohort (GSE169455). Then the NETs score-based risk stratification was verified in two validation cohorts (Taber et al.'s cohort, our institutional cohort). In the training cohort, high NETs-score was associated with poor chemotherapy response (AUC = 0.781) and reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.26-3.40], p = 0.003) in MIBC patients. The NETs-score was also demonstrated to be a predictive factor for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.731). The accuracy of the NETs-score was superior to other chemotherapy response predictors such as Ba/Sq expression subtype (AUC = 0.711), BRCA2 mutation (AUC = 0.692) and ERCC2 mutation (AUC = 0.548). Furthermore, in our center cohort, the expression level of H3Cit showed a significant difference between the response and no-response group (p = 0.01). Through immunohistochemical validation, NETs was an independent predictor of MIBC neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy as determined by the multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR = 5.94, 95% CI: 1.20-45.50, p = 0.045). Patients with high levels of NETs predicted poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study was the first to reveal the correlation between the level of NETs in MIBC and the efficacy of chemotherapy, which may provide a theoretical basis regarding NETs inhibitors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Carcinogenesis
Molecular Carcinogenesis 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
112
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Carcinogenesis publishes articles describing discoveries in basic and clinical science of the mechanisms involved in chemical-, environmental-, physical (e.g., radiation, trauma)-, infection and inflammation-associated cancer development, basic mechanisms of cancer prevention and therapy, the function of oncogenes and tumors suppressors, and the role of biomarkers for cancer risk prediction, molecular diagnosis and prognosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信