头颈癌患者姑息治疗路径中的电子健康。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Boyd N van den Besselaar, Kira S van Hof, Aniel Sewnaik, Robert J Baatenburg de Jong, Marinella P J Offerman
{"title":"头颈癌患者姑息治疗路径中的电子健康。","authors":"Boyd N van den Besselaar, Kira S van Hof, Aniel Sewnaik, Robert J Baatenburg de Jong, Marinella P J Offerman","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2024.3691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Expert Center of Palliative Care for head and neck cancer offers structural attention to patients' complex physical and psychosocial care needs. Patients are offered remote care, including digital monitoring using patient-reported outcome measures, to enable them to stay as long as possible in their trusted home environment. There is limited literature on qualitative feedback and patient-reported experiences with palliative head and neck cancer care, especially for remote care. To provide optimal palliative care, more information on this is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide insight into the experiences of patients with head and neck cancer and their next of kin with a hybrid palliative care pathway.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A mixed-methods quality improvement study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center. The experiences of patients with head and neck cancer in the palliative phase as of June 2022 and next of kin of patients who had died between June 2021 and March 2022 were evaluated using a patient-reported experience measure that included open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Hybrid palliative care pathway.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Experiences of patients and next of kin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 105 included participants, 54 (51.4%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 67.2 (12.7) years. A total of 56 participants were patients and 49 were next of kin. The face-to-face consultations on the day of the palliative diagnosis were positively experienced by most patients and next of kin. A total of 42 of 102 participants (41%) and 24 of 79 participants (30%) missed at least 1 topic during consultations with their physician and oncology nurse, respectively, such as discussing life expectancy. During the remote follow-up, 71 of 92 (77%) felt safe with this care: they were able to sufficiently clarify their problems, and if necessary, timely action was taken. However, 17 of 48 patients (35%) and 21 of 46 next of kin (46%) considered the provided psychosocial support to be insufficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this quality improvement study, patients and next of kin were satisfied with most aspects of the hybrid palliative care pathway, and remote care seemed to be a promising means of delivery. Key areas needing attention are discussing life expectancy and providing psychosocial support. These insights represent the initial steps toward gaining a deeper understanding of patients' needs during specific moments in a hybrid palliative trajectory. They may support health care professionals in optimizing personalized and value-based palliative care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Health in the Palliative Care Pathway for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Boyd N van den Besselaar, Kira S van Hof, Aniel Sewnaik, Robert J Baatenburg de Jong, Marinella P J Offerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaoto.2024.3691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Expert Center of Palliative Care for head and neck cancer offers structural attention to patients' complex physical and psychosocial care needs. Patients are offered remote care, including digital monitoring using patient-reported outcome measures, to enable them to stay as long as possible in their trusted home environment. There is limited literature on qualitative feedback and patient-reported experiences with palliative head and neck cancer care, especially for remote care. To provide optimal palliative care, more information on this is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide insight into the experiences of patients with head and neck cancer and their next of kin with a hybrid palliative care pathway.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A mixed-methods quality improvement study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center. The experiences of patients with head and neck cancer in the palliative phase as of June 2022 and next of kin of patients who had died between June 2021 and March 2022 were evaluated using a patient-reported experience measure that included open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Hybrid palliative care pathway.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Experiences of patients and next of kin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 105 included participants, 54 (51.4%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 67.2 (12.7) years. A total of 56 participants were patients and 49 were next of kin. The face-to-face consultations on the day of the palliative diagnosis were positively experienced by most patients and next of kin. A total of 42 of 102 participants (41%) and 24 of 79 participants (30%) missed at least 1 topic during consultations with their physician and oncology nurse, respectively, such as discussing life expectancy. During the remote follow-up, 71 of 92 (77%) felt safe with this care: they were able to sufficiently clarify their problems, and if necessary, timely action was taken. However, 17 of 48 patients (35%) and 21 of 46 next of kin (46%) considered the provided psychosocial support to be insufficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this quality improvement study, patients and next of kin were satisfied with most aspects of the hybrid palliative care pathway, and remote care seemed to be a promising means of delivery. Key areas needing attention are discussing life expectancy and providing psychosocial support. These insights represent the initial steps toward gaining a deeper understanding of patients' needs during specific moments in a hybrid palliative trajectory. They may support health care professionals in optimizing personalized and value-based palliative care delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2024.3691\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2024.3691","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:头颈部癌症姑息治疗专家中心对患者复杂的身体和社会心理护理需求给予结构性关注。为患者提供远程护理,包括使用患者报告的结果测量进行数字监测,使他们能够尽可能长时间地呆在自己信任的家庭环境中。有关头颈部癌症姑息治疗(尤其是远程治疗)的定性反馈和患者报告经验的文献十分有限。为了提供最佳的姑息治疗,我们需要更多这方面的信息:目的:深入了解头颈部癌症患者及其近亲对混合姑息治疗路径的体验:在一家三级癌症中心开展了一项混合方法质量改进研究。采用包括开放式问题在内的患者报告体验测量法,对截至2022年6月处于姑息治疗阶段的头颈部癌症患者及其在2021年6月至2022年3月期间死亡患者的近亲属的经历进行了评估:混合姑息关怀路径:主要结果和测量:患者和近亲的体验:在105名参与者中,54人(51.4%)为男性,平均(标清)年龄为67.2(12.7)岁。其中患者 56 人,近亲 49 人。大多数患者和近亲都对姑息诊断当天的面对面咨询有积极的体验。102名参与者中有42人(41%)和79名参与者中有24人(30%)在与医生和肿瘤科护士会诊时分别错过了至少一个话题,如讨论预期寿命。在远程随访期间,92 名参与者中有 71 人(77%)对这种护理感到安全:他们能够充分阐明自己的问题,如有必要,也会及时采取措施。然而,48 位患者中有 17 位(35%)和 46 位近亲中有 21 位(46%)认为所提供的社会心理支持不够:在这项质量改进研究中,患者和近亲对混合姑息关怀路径的大多数方面都表示满意,远程关怀似乎是一种很有前景的方式。需要关注的关键领域是讨论预期寿命和提供心理支持。这些见解是深入了解患者在混合姑息治疗路径中特定时刻的需求的第一步。它们可以帮助医护人员优化个性化和以价值为基础的姑息关怀服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electronic Health in the Palliative Care Pathway for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Importance: The Expert Center of Palliative Care for head and neck cancer offers structural attention to patients' complex physical and psychosocial care needs. Patients are offered remote care, including digital monitoring using patient-reported outcome measures, to enable them to stay as long as possible in their trusted home environment. There is limited literature on qualitative feedback and patient-reported experiences with palliative head and neck cancer care, especially for remote care. To provide optimal palliative care, more information on this is needed.

Objective: To provide insight into the experiences of patients with head and neck cancer and their next of kin with a hybrid palliative care pathway.

Design, setting, and participants: A mixed-methods quality improvement study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center. The experiences of patients with head and neck cancer in the palliative phase as of June 2022 and next of kin of patients who had died between June 2021 and March 2022 were evaluated using a patient-reported experience measure that included open-ended questions.

Exposures: Hybrid palliative care pathway.

Main outcomes and measures: Experiences of patients and next of kin.

Results: Of 105 included participants, 54 (51.4%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 67.2 (12.7) years. A total of 56 participants were patients and 49 were next of kin. The face-to-face consultations on the day of the palliative diagnosis were positively experienced by most patients and next of kin. A total of 42 of 102 participants (41%) and 24 of 79 participants (30%) missed at least 1 topic during consultations with their physician and oncology nurse, respectively, such as discussing life expectancy. During the remote follow-up, 71 of 92 (77%) felt safe with this care: they were able to sufficiently clarify their problems, and if necessary, timely action was taken. However, 17 of 48 patients (35%) and 21 of 46 next of kin (46%) considered the provided psychosocial support to be insufficient.

Conclusions and relevance: In this quality improvement study, patients and next of kin were satisfied with most aspects of the hybrid palliative care pathway, and remote care seemed to be a promising means of delivery. Key areas needing attention are discussing life expectancy and providing psychosocial support. These insights represent the initial steps toward gaining a deeper understanding of patients' needs during specific moments in a hybrid palliative trajectory. They may support health care professionals in optimizing personalized and value-based palliative care delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信