长卡素单抗在高风险和重度预处理复发/难治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤中的应用:来自美国21个中心的实际情况分析。

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Viktoriya Zelikson, Ashwath Gurumurthi, Yazeed Sawalha, Kaitlin Annunzio, Aditi Saha, Ning Dong, David Qualls, Behzad Amoozgar, Brad Kahl, John Baird, Pavan Challa, Scott F Huntington, Jennifer Santos, Steven Bair, Mayur Narkhede, Shuning Li, Zachary Frosch, Carrie Ho, Stephen D Smith, Allison Winter, Daniel Landsburg, Fateeha Furqan, Mehdi Hamadani, Katelin Baird, Jason Romancik, Hanan Alharthy, Jennie Law, Leyla Bojanini, Ranjana Advani, Boyu Hu, Patrick Connor Johnson, Natalie S Grover, Mwanasha Merril, Jennifer L Crombie, Nazila Shafagati, Cole Sterling, Loretta J Nastoupil, Narendranath Epperla, Emily C Ayers
{"title":"长卡素单抗在高风险和重度预处理复发/难治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤中的应用:来自美国21个中心的实际情况分析。","authors":"Viktoriya Zelikson, Ashwath Gurumurthi, Yazeed Sawalha, Kaitlin Annunzio, Aditi Saha, Ning Dong, David Qualls, Behzad Amoozgar, Brad Kahl, John Baird, Pavan Challa, Scott F Huntington, Jennifer Santos, Steven Bair, Mayur Narkhede, Shuning Li, Zachary Frosch, Carrie Ho, Stephen D Smith, Allison Winter, Daniel Landsburg, Fateeha Furqan, Mehdi Hamadani, Katelin Baird, Jason Romancik, Hanan Alharthy, Jennie Law, Leyla Bojanini, Ranjana Advani, Boyu Hu, Patrick Connor Johnson, Natalie S Grover, Mwanasha Merril, Jennifer L Crombie, Nazila Shafagati, Cole Sterling, Loretta J Nastoupil, Narendranath Epperla, Emily C Ayers","doi":"10.3324/haematol.2024.285977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are poor. Loncastuximab- teserine (Lonca) is an antibody-drug conjugate which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL who have received at least two prior lines of therapy, based on the results of the LOTIS-2 trial. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy in the real-world setting. This retrospective study included 21 US centers and evaluated outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with Lonca. Our analysis comprises 187 patients with notably higher-risk baseline features compared to those of the LOTIS-2 population, including a higher proportion of patients with bulky disease (17% vs. 0%), high-grade B-cell histology (22% vs. 8%), and increased number of prior lines of therapy (median 4 vs. 3). The complete response rate was 14% and overall response rate was 32%. The median event-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Those with bulky disease and high-grade B-cell histology had significantly worse outcomes, and those with non-germinal center cell of origin and a complete response to the most recent line of therapy demonstrated superior outcomes. In summary, in this largest retrospective cohort study of Lonca in the real-world setting, the response rates, event-free survival and overall survival were lower than those reported in LOTIS-2, which is likely reflective of its use in higher risk and more heavily pre-treated patients in the real world compared to the patients enrolled on a clinical study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12964,"journal":{"name":"Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":"706-714"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loncastuximab in high-risk and heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a realworld analysis from 21 US centers.\",\"authors\":\"Viktoriya Zelikson, Ashwath Gurumurthi, Yazeed Sawalha, Kaitlin Annunzio, Aditi Saha, Ning Dong, David Qualls, Behzad Amoozgar, Brad Kahl, John Baird, Pavan Challa, Scott F Huntington, Jennifer Santos, Steven Bair, Mayur Narkhede, Shuning Li, Zachary Frosch, Carrie Ho, Stephen D Smith, Allison Winter, Daniel Landsburg, Fateeha Furqan, Mehdi Hamadani, Katelin Baird, Jason Romancik, Hanan Alharthy, Jennie Law, Leyla Bojanini, Ranjana Advani, Boyu Hu, Patrick Connor Johnson, Natalie S Grover, Mwanasha Merril, Jennifer L Crombie, Nazila Shafagati, Cole Sterling, Loretta J Nastoupil, Narendranath Epperla, Emily C Ayers\",\"doi\":\"10.3324/haematol.2024.285977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are poor. Loncastuximab- teserine (Lonca) is an antibody-drug conjugate which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL who have received at least two prior lines of therapy, based on the results of the LOTIS-2 trial. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy in the real-world setting. This retrospective study included 21 US centers and evaluated outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with Lonca. Our analysis comprises 187 patients with notably higher-risk baseline features compared to those of the LOTIS-2 population, including a higher proportion of patients with bulky disease (17% vs. 0%), high-grade B-cell histology (22% vs. 8%), and increased number of prior lines of therapy (median 4 vs. 3). The complete response rate was 14% and overall response rate was 32%. The median event-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Those with bulky disease and high-grade B-cell histology had significantly worse outcomes, and those with non-germinal center cell of origin and a complete response to the most recent line of therapy demonstrated superior outcomes. In summary, in this largest retrospective cohort study of Lonca in the real-world setting, the response rates, event-free survival and overall survival were lower than those reported in LOTIS-2, which is likely reflective of its use in higher risk and more heavily pre-treated patients in the real world compared to the patients enrolled on a clinical study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haematologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"706-714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haematologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2024.285977\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2024.285977","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复发/难治(R/R)弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的治疗效果很差。Loncastuximab-teserine(Lonca)是一种抗体药物共轭物(ADC),根据LOTIS-2试验,FDA已批准用于至少接受过两线治疗的复发/难治性DLBCL患者。然而,有关它在真实世界(RWS)中疗效的数据却很有限。这项回顾性研究包括 21 个美国中心,评估了接受龙卡治疗的 R/R DLBCL 患者的疗效。与 LOTIS-2 相比,我们的分析包括了 187 例风险基线特征明显较高的患者,其中包括较高比例的肿块型疾病患者(17% 对 0%)、高级别 B 细胞组织学 (HGBL) 患者(22% 对 8%),以及较多的既往治疗次数(中位数为 4 次对 3 次)。完全应答率(CR)为14%,总应答率(ORR)为32%。中位无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为 2.1 个月和 4.6 个月。大块病变和HGBL患者的预后明显较差,而非原发生殖中心细胞和最近一次治疗获得CR的患者预后较好。总之,在这项规模最大的回顾性队列研究中,隆卡在RWS中的反应率、EFS和OS均低于LOTIS-2中的报告,这可能反映了与临床研究中的入组患者相比,隆卡在现实世界中用于风险更高、预处理更多的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Loncastuximab in high-risk and heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a realworld analysis from 21 US centers.

Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are poor. Loncastuximab- teserine (Lonca) is an antibody-drug conjugate which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL who have received at least two prior lines of therapy, based on the results of the LOTIS-2 trial. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy in the real-world setting. This retrospective study included 21 US centers and evaluated outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with Lonca. Our analysis comprises 187 patients with notably higher-risk baseline features compared to those of the LOTIS-2 population, including a higher proportion of patients with bulky disease (17% vs. 0%), high-grade B-cell histology (22% vs. 8%), and increased number of prior lines of therapy (median 4 vs. 3). The complete response rate was 14% and overall response rate was 32%. The median event-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Those with bulky disease and high-grade B-cell histology had significantly worse outcomes, and those with non-germinal center cell of origin and a complete response to the most recent line of therapy demonstrated superior outcomes. In summary, in this largest retrospective cohort study of Lonca in the real-world setting, the response rates, event-free survival and overall survival were lower than those reported in LOTIS-2, which is likely reflective of its use in higher risk and more heavily pre-treated patients in the real world compared to the patients enrolled on a clinical study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Haematologica
Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
349
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haematologica is a journal that publishes articles within the broad field of hematology. It reports on novel findings in basic, clinical, and translational research. Scope: The scope of the journal includes reporting novel research results that: Have a significant impact on understanding normal hematology or the development of hematological diseases. Are likely to bring important changes to the diagnosis or treatment of hematological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信