{"title":"角膜上皮厚度图在检测早期角膜炎中的作用。","authors":"Zizhen Wang, Ruilan Dong, Yifei Yuan, Yu Zhang, Yueguo Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06682-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To detect subtle changes in early keratoconus by evaluating corneal epithelial thickness differences among patients with binocular very asymmetric ectasia (VAE) and normal subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Corneal epithelial thickness was measured using the Fourier-domain AS-OCT system RTVue<sup>®</sup> 100 (Optovue, Fremont, CA, USA). 152 eyes from 76 patients were divided into three groups: Very asymmetry ectasia-ectasia (VAE-E, n = 38), Very asymmetry ectasia-normal topography (VAE-NT, n = 38), and Normal control (NC, n = 76). Discrimination capacity was assessed using areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the keratoconus group, the epithelial Min (minimum), central, midperipheral I (inferior), midperipheral IT (inferior-temporal), peripheral IT, and midperipheral T (temporal) were thinner (all P < 0.05). The topography normal group had thinner midperipheral IN (inferior-nasal), peripheral IN, midperipheral T, and peripheral T, and larger Max-Min and Std. Dev (P < 0.05). For diagnosing typical keratoconus, Std. Dev (AUC = 0.982, sensitivity 97.4%, specificity 92.1%) had the highest diagnostic efficiency. Combining four variables (Minimum, Max-Min, Midperipheral IT, and Midperipheral I) performed well in distinguishing topography normal eyes (AUC = 0.896, sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 89.5%). Multivariable analysis using epithelial parameters combined with Pentacam random forest index (PRFI) yielded the best results (AUC = 0.951, sensitivity 90.6%, specificity 89.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The corneal epithelial parameters play an important auxiliary role in the diagnosis of keratoconus and the screening of subclinical keratoconus. Combination of epithelial parameters and tomographic parameters can improve the sensitivity of early stage keratoconus detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of corneal epithelial thickness map in detecting early keratoconus.\",\"authors\":\"Zizhen Wang, Ruilan Dong, Yifei Yuan, Yu Zhang, Yueguo Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00417-024-06682-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To detect subtle changes in early keratoconus by evaluating corneal epithelial thickness differences among patients with binocular very asymmetric ectasia (VAE) and normal subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Corneal epithelial thickness was measured using the Fourier-domain AS-OCT system RTVue<sup>®</sup> 100 (Optovue, Fremont, CA, USA). 152 eyes from 76 patients were divided into three groups: Very asymmetry ectasia-ectasia (VAE-E, n = 38), Very asymmetry ectasia-normal topography (VAE-NT, n = 38), and Normal control (NC, n = 76). Discrimination capacity was assessed using areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the keratoconus group, the epithelial Min (minimum), central, midperipheral I (inferior), midperipheral IT (inferior-temporal), peripheral IT, and midperipheral T (temporal) were thinner (all P < 0.05). The topography normal group had thinner midperipheral IN (inferior-nasal), peripheral IN, midperipheral T, and peripheral T, and larger Max-Min and Std. Dev (P < 0.05). For diagnosing typical keratoconus, Std. Dev (AUC = 0.982, sensitivity 97.4%, specificity 92.1%) had the highest diagnostic efficiency. Combining four variables (Minimum, Max-Min, Midperipheral IT, and Midperipheral I) performed well in distinguishing topography normal eyes (AUC = 0.896, sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 89.5%). Multivariable analysis using epithelial parameters combined with Pentacam random forest index (PRFI) yielded the best results (AUC = 0.951, sensitivity 90.6%, specificity 89.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The corneal epithelial parameters play an important auxiliary role in the diagnosis of keratoconus and the screening of subclinical keratoconus. Combination of epithelial parameters and tomographic parameters can improve the sensitivity of early stage keratoconus detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06682-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06682-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of corneal epithelial thickness map in detecting early keratoconus.
Purpose: To detect subtle changes in early keratoconus by evaluating corneal epithelial thickness differences among patients with binocular very asymmetric ectasia (VAE) and normal subjects.
Methods: Corneal epithelial thickness was measured using the Fourier-domain AS-OCT system RTVue® 100 (Optovue, Fremont, CA, USA). 152 eyes from 76 patients were divided into three groups: Very asymmetry ectasia-ectasia (VAE-E, n = 38), Very asymmetry ectasia-normal topography (VAE-NT, n = 38), and Normal control (NC, n = 76). Discrimination capacity was assessed using areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results: In the keratoconus group, the epithelial Min (minimum), central, midperipheral I (inferior), midperipheral IT (inferior-temporal), peripheral IT, and midperipheral T (temporal) were thinner (all P < 0.05). The topography normal group had thinner midperipheral IN (inferior-nasal), peripheral IN, midperipheral T, and peripheral T, and larger Max-Min and Std. Dev (P < 0.05). For diagnosing typical keratoconus, Std. Dev (AUC = 0.982, sensitivity 97.4%, specificity 92.1%) had the highest diagnostic efficiency. Combining four variables (Minimum, Max-Min, Midperipheral IT, and Midperipheral I) performed well in distinguishing topography normal eyes (AUC = 0.896, sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 89.5%). Multivariable analysis using epithelial parameters combined with Pentacam random forest index (PRFI) yielded the best results (AUC = 0.951, sensitivity 90.6%, specificity 89.5%).
Conclusions: The corneal epithelial parameters play an important auxiliary role in the diagnosis of keratoconus and the screening of subclinical keratoconus. Combination of epithelial parameters and tomographic parameters can improve the sensitivity of early stage keratoconus detection.
期刊介绍:
Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.