缺血测试和冠状动脉再通术对无急性冠状动脉综合征的单形性室性心动过速患者死亡率和室性心动过速复发的影响:一项元分析和系统性回顾。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nischay Shah, Avinash Saraiya, Tejas Patel, Francis E Marchlinski, Samir Pancholy
{"title":"缺血测试和冠状动脉再通术对无急性冠状动脉综合征的单形性室性心动过速患者死亡率和室性心动过速复发的影响:一项元分析和系统性回顾。","authors":"Nischay Shah, Avinash Saraiya, Tejas Patel, Francis E Marchlinski, Samir Pancholy","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies show mixed results regarding the effect of coronary revascularization on mortality benefit and ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence in patients with monomorphic VT without acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of ischemia testing and/or coronary revascularization on mortality and VT recurrence in a pooled data set.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to December 2023 for studies reporting event data on mortality and VT recurrence in patients without ACS who presented with monomorphic VT. Data were pooled and analyzed using random effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled sample consisted of a total of five studies, with 1062 patients, of whom 433 underwent ischemia testing and/or coronary revascularization and 629 did not. There was no statistically significant difference in the mortality and VT recurrence in the patients who underwent ischemia testing and/or revascularization versus those who did not (mortality odds ratio [OR]: 0.98; [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62 to 1.53]; p = 0.92; VT recurrence OR: 1.07; [95% CI: 0.51 to 2.26]; p = 0.86). No publication bias was detected by examination of the funnel plot, Begg-Mazumdar's test (p = 0.80), and Egger's test (p = 0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, in patients with sustained monomorphic VT in the absence of ACS, ischemia testing and/or revascularization does not lead to improved mortality or a decrease in the incidence of VT recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Ischemia Testing and Coronary Revascularization on Mortality and Ventricular Tachycardia Recurrence in Patients With Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Without Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nischay Shah, Avinash Saraiya, Tejas Patel, Francis E Marchlinski, Samir Pancholy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies show mixed results regarding the effect of coronary revascularization on mortality benefit and ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence in patients with monomorphic VT without acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of ischemia testing and/or coronary revascularization on mortality and VT recurrence in a pooled data set.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to December 2023 for studies reporting event data on mortality and VT recurrence in patients without ACS who presented with monomorphic VT. Data were pooled and analyzed using random effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled sample consisted of a total of five studies, with 1062 patients, of whom 433 underwent ischemia testing and/or coronary revascularization and 629 did not. There was no statistically significant difference in the mortality and VT recurrence in the patients who underwent ischemia testing and/or revascularization versus those who did not (mortality odds ratio [OR]: 0.98; [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62 to 1.53]; p = 0.92; VT recurrence OR: 1.07; [95% CI: 0.51 to 2.26]; p = 0.86). No publication bias was detected by examination of the funnel plot, Begg-Mazumdar's test (p = 0.80), and Egger's test (p = 0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, in patients with sustained monomorphic VT in the absence of ACS, ischemia testing and/or revascularization does not lead to improved mortality or a decrease in the incidence of VT recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31294\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于冠状动脉血运重建对无急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的单形性VT患者的死亡率和室性心动过速(VT)复发的影响,研究结果不一。这项荟萃分析旨在评估缺血测试和/或冠状动脉再通术对死亡率和室速复发的影响:方法:检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间包括 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library 在内的数据库,以查找报告无 ACS 且出现单形 VT 患者死亡率和 VT 复发率事件数据的研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析法对数据进行汇总和分析:汇总样本共包括五项研究,共有 1062 例患者,其中 433 例接受了缺血检测和/或冠状动脉血运重建,629 例未接受检测和/或冠状动脉血运重建。接受缺血检测和/或血管重建的患者与未接受检测和/或血管重建的患者在死亡率和 VT 复发率方面没有明显的统计学差异(死亡率几率比 [OR]:0.98;[95% 置信区间 (CI):0.62 至 1.53];P = 0.92;VT 复发 OR:1.07;[95% CI:0.51 至 2.26];P = 0.86)。通过研究漏斗图、Begg-Mazumdar检验(P = 0.80)和Egger检验(P = 0.91),未发现发表偏倚:总之,对于无 ACS 的持续性单形 VT 患者,缺血测试和/或血管重建并不能改善死亡率或降低 VT 复发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Ischemia Testing and Coronary Revascularization on Mortality and Ventricular Tachycardia Recurrence in Patients With Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Without Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Background: Studies show mixed results regarding the effect of coronary revascularization on mortality benefit and ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence in patients with monomorphic VT without acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of ischemia testing and/or coronary revascularization on mortality and VT recurrence in a pooled data set.

Methods: Databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to December 2023 for studies reporting event data on mortality and VT recurrence in patients without ACS who presented with monomorphic VT. Data were pooled and analyzed using random effects meta-analysis.

Results: The pooled sample consisted of a total of five studies, with 1062 patients, of whom 433 underwent ischemia testing and/or coronary revascularization and 629 did not. There was no statistically significant difference in the mortality and VT recurrence in the patients who underwent ischemia testing and/or revascularization versus those who did not (mortality odds ratio [OR]: 0.98; [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62 to 1.53]; p = 0.92; VT recurrence OR: 1.07; [95% CI: 0.51 to 2.26]; p = 0.86). No publication bias was detected by examination of the funnel plot, Begg-Mazumdar's test (p = 0.80), and Egger's test (p = 0.91).

Conclusion: In conclusion, in patients with sustained monomorphic VT in the absence of ACS, ischemia testing and/or revascularization does not lead to improved mortality or a decrease in the incidence of VT recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信