研究关系效用在内疚和悔恨中的作用。

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Xiaolu Zhang , Marcel Zeelenberg , Seger M. Breugelmans
{"title":"研究关系效用在内疚和悔恨中的作用。","authors":"Xiaolu Zhang ,&nbsp;Marcel Zeelenberg ,&nbsp;Seger M. Breugelmans","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Relational utility refers to the value of another person for the attainment of one's future goals through social interaction. Nelissen (2014) found that relational utility influences the intensity of guilt feelings. Specifically, people would feel stronger guilt for hurting a person if this person has high relational utility compared to low relational utility. Guilt is thus not only sensitive to how much another person is hurt, but also to one's own future benefits. Previous research suggested that regret, an emotion strongly related to guilt, is typically experienced when one's own benefit is involved. Regret was not measured in Nelissen's research. In the present research, we examined the role of relational utility in experienced guilt and regret and explored whether the effect of relational utility on regret could explain why relational utility has an effect on guilt. Specifically, we attempt to replicate and extend Nelissen's Study 1 by adding a measure of regret. In two experimental studies we did not replicate the effect of relational utility on guilt, and we only found an effect of relational utility on regret in Study 1 (and not in Study 2). Possible reasons for the contradictory findings of the two studies are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 104607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the role of relational utility in guilt and regret\",\"authors\":\"Xiaolu Zhang ,&nbsp;Marcel Zeelenberg ,&nbsp;Seger M. Breugelmans\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Relational utility refers to the value of another person for the attainment of one's future goals through social interaction. Nelissen (2014) found that relational utility influences the intensity of guilt feelings. Specifically, people would feel stronger guilt for hurting a person if this person has high relational utility compared to low relational utility. Guilt is thus not only sensitive to how much another person is hurt, but also to one's own future benefits. Previous research suggested that regret, an emotion strongly related to guilt, is typically experienced when one's own benefit is involved. Regret was not measured in Nelissen's research. In the present research, we examined the role of relational utility in experienced guilt and regret and explored whether the effect of relational utility on regret could explain why relational utility has an effect on guilt. Specifically, we attempt to replicate and extend Nelissen's Study 1 by adding a measure of regret. In two experimental studies we did not replicate the effect of relational utility on guilt, and we only found an effect of relational utility on regret in Study 1 (and not in Study 2). Possible reasons for the contradictory findings of the two studies are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"251 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824004852\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824004852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关系效用指的是他人对通过社会互动实现个人未来目标的价值。Nelissen(2014)发现,关系效用会影响内疚感的强度。具体来说,如果一个人的关系效用高,那么与关系效用低的人相比,人们会对伤害一个人产生更强烈的内疚感。因此,内疚感不仅对他人受到伤害的程度敏感,而且对自己未来的利益也很敏感。以往的研究表明,与内疚感密切相关的一种情绪--后悔,通常是在涉及自身利益时才会出现。在 Nelissen 的研究中并没有对后悔进行测量。在本研究中,我们考察了关系效用在体验到的内疚和后悔中的作用,并探讨了关系效用对后悔的影响是否可以解释为什么关系效用对内疚有影响。具体来说,我们试图通过添加后悔的测量指标来复制和扩展 Nelissen 的研究 1。在两项实验研究中,我们没有复制关系效用对内疚感的影响,我们只在研究 1(而不是研究 2)中发现了关系效用对后悔的影响。本文讨论了这两项研究结果相互矛盾的可能原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the role of relational utility in guilt and regret
Relational utility refers to the value of another person for the attainment of one's future goals through social interaction. Nelissen (2014) found that relational utility influences the intensity of guilt feelings. Specifically, people would feel stronger guilt for hurting a person if this person has high relational utility compared to low relational utility. Guilt is thus not only sensitive to how much another person is hurt, but also to one's own future benefits. Previous research suggested that regret, an emotion strongly related to guilt, is typically experienced when one's own benefit is involved. Regret was not measured in Nelissen's research. In the present research, we examined the role of relational utility in experienced guilt and regret and explored whether the effect of relational utility on regret could explain why relational utility has an effect on guilt. Specifically, we attempt to replicate and extend Nelissen's Study 1 by adding a measure of regret. In two experimental studies we did not replicate the effect of relational utility on guilt, and we only found an effect of relational utility on regret in Study 1 (and not in Study 2). Possible reasons for the contradictory findings of the two studies are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信