经脊柱聚焦超声无创相位校正的活体外验证:模型性能和目标可行性。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
David Martin, Rui Xu, Max Dressler, Meaghan A O'Reilly
{"title":"经脊柱聚焦超声无创相位校正的活体外验证:模型性能和目标可行性。","authors":"David Martin, Rui Xu, Max Dressler, Meaghan A O'Reilly","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8fed","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>To evaluate the feasibility of transspine focused ultrasound using simulation-based phase corrections from a CT-derived ray acoustics model.<i>Approach.</i>Bilateral transspine focusing was performed in<i>ex vivo</i>human vertebrae with a spine-specific ultrasound array. Ray acoustics-derived phase correction was compared to geometric focusing and a hydrophone-corrected gold standard. Planar hydrophone scans were recorded in the spinal canal and three metrics were calculated: target pressure, coronal and sagittal focal shift, and coronal and sagittal Sørensen-Dice similarity to the free-field.<i>Post hoc</i>analysis was performed<i>in silico</i>to assess the impact of windows between vertebrae on focal shift.<i>Main results.</i>Hydrophone correction reduced mean sagittal plane shift from 1.74 ± 0.82 mm to 1.40 ± 0.82 mm and mean coronal plane shift from 1.07 ± 0.63 mm to 0.54 ± 0.49 mm. Ray acoustics correction reduced mean sagittal plane and coronal plane shift to 1.63 ± 0.83 mm and 0.83 ± 0.60 mm, respectively. Hydrophone correction increased mean sagittal similarity from 0.48 ± 0.22 to 0.68 ± 0.19 and mean coronal similarity from 0.48 ± 0.23 to 0.70 ± 0.19. Ray acoustics correction increased mean sagittal and coronal similarity to 0.53 ± 0.25 and 0.55 ± 0.26, respectively. Target pressure was relatively unchanged across beamforming methods.<i>In silico</i>analysis found that, for some targets, unoccluded paths may have increased focal shift.<i>Significance</i>. Gold standard phase correction significantly reduced coronal shift and significantly increased sagittal and coronal Sørensen-Dice similarity (<i>p</i>< 0.05). Ray acoustics-derived phase correction reduced sagittal and coronal shift and increased sagittal and coronal similarity but did not achieve statistical significance. Across beamforming methods, mean focal shift was comparable to MRI resolution, suggesting that transspine focusing is possible with minimal correction in favourable targets. Future work will explore the mitigation of acoustic windows with anti-focus control points.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Ex vivo</i>validation of non-invasive phase correction for transspine focused ultrasound: model performance and target feasibility.\",\"authors\":\"David Martin, Rui Xu, Max Dressler, Meaghan A O'Reilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8fed\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>To evaluate the feasibility of transspine focused ultrasound using simulation-based phase corrections from a CT-derived ray acoustics model.<i>Approach.</i>Bilateral transspine focusing was performed in<i>ex vivo</i>human vertebrae with a spine-specific ultrasound array. Ray acoustics-derived phase correction was compared to geometric focusing and a hydrophone-corrected gold standard. Planar hydrophone scans were recorded in the spinal canal and three metrics were calculated: target pressure, coronal and sagittal focal shift, and coronal and sagittal Sørensen-Dice similarity to the free-field.<i>Post hoc</i>analysis was performed<i>in silico</i>to assess the impact of windows between vertebrae on focal shift.<i>Main results.</i>Hydrophone correction reduced mean sagittal plane shift from 1.74 ± 0.82 mm to 1.40 ± 0.82 mm and mean coronal plane shift from 1.07 ± 0.63 mm to 0.54 ± 0.49 mm. Ray acoustics correction reduced mean sagittal plane and coronal plane shift to 1.63 ± 0.83 mm and 0.83 ± 0.60 mm, respectively. Hydrophone correction increased mean sagittal similarity from 0.48 ± 0.22 to 0.68 ± 0.19 and mean coronal similarity from 0.48 ± 0.23 to 0.70 ± 0.19. Ray acoustics correction increased mean sagittal and coronal similarity to 0.53 ± 0.25 and 0.55 ± 0.26, respectively. Target pressure was relatively unchanged across beamforming methods.<i>In silico</i>analysis found that, for some targets, unoccluded paths may have increased focal shift.<i>Significance</i>. Gold standard phase correction significantly reduced coronal shift and significantly increased sagittal and coronal Sørensen-Dice similarity (<i>p</i>< 0.05). Ray acoustics-derived phase correction reduced sagittal and coronal shift and increased sagittal and coronal similarity but did not achieve statistical significance. Across beamforming methods, mean focal shift was comparable to MRI resolution, suggesting that transspine focusing is possible with minimal correction in favourable targets. Future work will explore the mitigation of acoustic windows with anti-focus control points.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8fed\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8fed","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估利用基于 CT 导出的射线声学模型的模拟相位修正进行经脊柱聚焦超声的可行性。使用脊柱专用超声阵列在体外人体椎体中进行双侧经脊柱聚焦。射线声学相位校正与几何聚焦和水声校正黄金标准进行了比较。在椎管内记录平面水听器扫描,并计算三个指标:目标压力、冠状面和矢状面焦点偏移,以及冠状面和矢状面与自由场的 Sørensen-Dice 相似度。我们还进行了事后分析,以评估椎体之间的窗口对焦点偏移的影响。水听器校正将平均矢状面偏移从 1.74 ± 0.82 mm 减少到 1.40 ± 0.82 mm,平均冠状面偏移从 1.07 ± 0.63 mm 减少到 0.54 ± 0.49 mm。射线声学校正将平均矢状面和冠状面偏移分别减少到 1.63 ± 0.83 毫米和 0.83 ± 0.60 毫米。水听器校正将平均矢状面相似度从 0.48 ± 0.22 提高到 0.68 ± 0.19,将平均冠状面相似度从 0.48 ± 0.23 提高到 0.70 ± 0.19。射线声学校正将平均矢状面和冠状面相似度分别提高到 0.53 ± 0.25 和 0.55 ± 0.26。不同波束成形方法的目标压力相对不变。硅学分析发现,对于某些目标,未排除的路径可能会增加焦点偏移。金标准相位校正大大减少了冠状位移,并大大增加了矢状面和冠状面的索伦森-戴斯相似度(p < 0.05)。射线声学相位校正减少了矢状和冠状位移,增加了矢状和冠状位相似度,但未达到统计学意义。在各种波束成形方法中,平均病灶偏移与核磁共振成像分辨率相当,这表明在有利的目标中,只需进行最小的校正就可以实现跨脊柱聚焦。未来的工作将探索用反聚焦控制点减轻声窗的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ex vivovalidation of non-invasive phase correction for transspine focused ultrasound: model performance and target feasibility.

Objective.To evaluate the feasibility of transspine focused ultrasound using simulation-based phase corrections from a CT-derived ray acoustics model.Approach.Bilateral transspine focusing was performed inex vivohuman vertebrae with a spine-specific ultrasound array. Ray acoustics-derived phase correction was compared to geometric focusing and a hydrophone-corrected gold standard. Planar hydrophone scans were recorded in the spinal canal and three metrics were calculated: target pressure, coronal and sagittal focal shift, and coronal and sagittal Sørensen-Dice similarity to the free-field.Post hocanalysis was performedin silicoto assess the impact of windows between vertebrae on focal shift.Main results.Hydrophone correction reduced mean sagittal plane shift from 1.74 ± 0.82 mm to 1.40 ± 0.82 mm and mean coronal plane shift from 1.07 ± 0.63 mm to 0.54 ± 0.49 mm. Ray acoustics correction reduced mean sagittal plane and coronal plane shift to 1.63 ± 0.83 mm and 0.83 ± 0.60 mm, respectively. Hydrophone correction increased mean sagittal similarity from 0.48 ± 0.22 to 0.68 ± 0.19 and mean coronal similarity from 0.48 ± 0.23 to 0.70 ± 0.19. Ray acoustics correction increased mean sagittal and coronal similarity to 0.53 ± 0.25 and 0.55 ± 0.26, respectively. Target pressure was relatively unchanged across beamforming methods.In silicoanalysis found that, for some targets, unoccluded paths may have increased focal shift.Significance. Gold standard phase correction significantly reduced coronal shift and significantly increased sagittal and coronal Sørensen-Dice similarity (p< 0.05). Ray acoustics-derived phase correction reduced sagittal and coronal shift and increased sagittal and coronal similarity but did not achieve statistical significance. Across beamforming methods, mean focal shift was comparable to MRI resolution, suggesting that transspine focusing is possible with minimal correction in favourable targets. Future work will explore the mitigation of acoustic windows with anti-focus control points.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信