在柔性膀胱镜检查中使用内鞘:对超过 1000 个病例的前瞻性评估

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Lara Ratcliffe, Brian Birch
{"title":"在柔性膀胱镜检查中使用内鞘:对超过 1000 个病例的前瞻性评估","authors":"Lara Ratcliffe, Brian Birch","doi":"10.1111/bju.16578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo investigate patient tolerability and safety (using urinary tract infection (UTI) as a proxy measure) following EndoSheath‐assisted flexible cystoscopy (eFC). EndoSheaths are single‐use, disposable sheaths used in FC. They reduce cystoscope turnaround times as complicated, time‐consuming and costly sterilisation is no longer necessary. This reduces patient waiting times as cystoscope idle time, the most common rate limiting step, is reduced.Patients and MethodsAll adult patients undergoing eFC over a 26‐month period at a single institution were evaluated prospectively. Post‐eFC, participants rated discomfort on a visual analogue scale (discomfort 1 = none, 2–4 = mild, 5–7 = moderate, 8–10 = severe). The diagnosis of UTI was broad and based on any one of patient self‐report, positive urine culture or antibiotic prescription within 30 days of eFC. Data were analysed using chi‐squared testing (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05, two‐tailed).ResultsOf the 1091 eFCs analysed, 33.2% and 48.2% of were ranked as causing no or mild discomfort, respectively, with just 3.1% ranked severe. Discomfort was greater in younger participants but similar between sexes. Overall, post‐eFC UTI incidence was 13.3%, with rates higher in females (18.1%) than males (11.2%). Participants aged ≥65 years reported a higher UTI rate (15.4%) than those aged &lt;65 years (8.8%). No participants developed urosepsis.ConclusionThis large, prospective, unselected, real‐world study reports that eFC is well tolerated. UTI was higher in females than males, and in those aged ≥65 years, in line with other studies using the same broad based diagnostic criteria for UTI. The conclusion is that eFC is both well tolerated and safe.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EndoSheath use in flexible cystoscopy: a prospective evaluation of >1000 cases\",\"authors\":\"Lara Ratcliffe, Brian Birch\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bju.16578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesTo investigate patient tolerability and safety (using urinary tract infection (UTI) as a proxy measure) following EndoSheath‐assisted flexible cystoscopy (eFC). EndoSheaths are single‐use, disposable sheaths used in FC. They reduce cystoscope turnaround times as complicated, time‐consuming and costly sterilisation is no longer necessary. This reduces patient waiting times as cystoscope idle time, the most common rate limiting step, is reduced.Patients and MethodsAll adult patients undergoing eFC over a 26‐month period at a single institution were evaluated prospectively. Post‐eFC, participants rated discomfort on a visual analogue scale (discomfort 1 = none, 2–4 = mild, 5–7 = moderate, 8–10 = severe). The diagnosis of UTI was broad and based on any one of patient self‐report, positive urine culture or antibiotic prescription within 30 days of eFC. Data were analysed using chi‐squared testing (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05, two‐tailed).ResultsOf the 1091 eFCs analysed, 33.2% and 48.2% of were ranked as causing no or mild discomfort, respectively, with just 3.1% ranked severe. Discomfort was greater in younger participants but similar between sexes. Overall, post‐eFC UTI incidence was 13.3%, with rates higher in females (18.1%) than males (11.2%). Participants aged ≥65 years reported a higher UTI rate (15.4%) than those aged &lt;65 years (8.8%). No participants developed urosepsis.ConclusionThis large, prospective, unselected, real‐world study reports that eFC is well tolerated. UTI was higher in females than males, and in those aged ≥65 years, in line with other studies using the same broad based diagnostic criteria for UTI. The conclusion is that eFC is both well tolerated and safe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJU International\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJU International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16578\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究患者接受内鞘辅助柔性膀胱镜检查(eFC)后的耐受性和安全性(以尿路感染(UTI)作为替代指标)。EndoSheaths 是用于膀胱镜检查的一次性鞘管。由于不再需要复杂、耗时和昂贵的消毒,它们缩短了膀胱镜的周转时间。患者和方法对一家医疗机构在 26 个月内接受 eFC 的所有成年患者进行了前瞻性评估。eFC 术后,参与者用视觉模拟量表对不适感进行评分(不适感 1 = 无,2-4 = 轻度,5-7 = 中度,8-10 = 重度)。UTI的诊断范围很广,基于患者自我报告、尿培养阳性或eFC后30天内的抗生素处方中的任意一种。结果 在分析的 1091 例 eFC 中,分别有 33.2% 和 48.2% 的 eFC 被评为无不适感或轻度不适感,仅有 3.1% 的 eFC 被评为重度不适感。年轻参与者的不适感较强,但男女之间的不适感相似。总体而言,eFC 后尿毒症发生率为 13.3%,女性(18.1%)高于男性(11.2%)。年龄≥65 岁的参与者尿毒症发病率(15.4%)高于年龄为 65 岁的参与者(8.8%)。结论这项大规模、前瞻性、非选择性的真实世界研究表明,eFC 的耐受性良好。女性尿毒症患者多于男性,年龄≥65 岁的患者也较多,这与其他采用相同的尿毒症广泛诊断标准的研究结果一致。结论是 eFC 具有良好的耐受性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EndoSheath use in flexible cystoscopy: a prospective evaluation of >1000 cases
ObjectivesTo investigate patient tolerability and safety (using urinary tract infection (UTI) as a proxy measure) following EndoSheath‐assisted flexible cystoscopy (eFC). EndoSheaths are single‐use, disposable sheaths used in FC. They reduce cystoscope turnaround times as complicated, time‐consuming and costly sterilisation is no longer necessary. This reduces patient waiting times as cystoscope idle time, the most common rate limiting step, is reduced.Patients and MethodsAll adult patients undergoing eFC over a 26‐month period at a single institution were evaluated prospectively. Post‐eFC, participants rated discomfort on a visual analogue scale (discomfort 1 = none, 2–4 = mild, 5–7 = moderate, 8–10 = severe). The diagnosis of UTI was broad and based on any one of patient self‐report, positive urine culture or antibiotic prescription within 30 days of eFC. Data were analysed using chi‐squared testing (P < 0.05, two‐tailed).ResultsOf the 1091 eFCs analysed, 33.2% and 48.2% of were ranked as causing no or mild discomfort, respectively, with just 3.1% ranked severe. Discomfort was greater in younger participants but similar between sexes. Overall, post‐eFC UTI incidence was 13.3%, with rates higher in females (18.1%) than males (11.2%). Participants aged ≥65 years reported a higher UTI rate (15.4%) than those aged <65 years (8.8%). No participants developed urosepsis.ConclusionThis large, prospective, unselected, real‐world study reports that eFC is well tolerated. UTI was higher in females than males, and in those aged ≥65 years, in line with other studies using the same broad based diagnostic criteria for UTI. The conclusion is that eFC is both well tolerated and safe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信