当今公用事业监管中的寻租行为

Kenneth W. Costello
{"title":"当今公用事业监管中的寻租行为","authors":"Kenneth W. Costello","doi":"10.1002/gas.22434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A current regulatory issue in the United States centers on the business model of utilities, which includes asking to what extent utilities should broaden their activities to satisfy society-wide political demands. There seems to be an inherent discordance between treating utilities as both a for-profit business and a purveyor of public goods. This tension complicates efforts to achieve a political equilibrium (i.e., a consensus) and retain the traditional objective of utility regulation to assure “just and reasonable” prices and reliable service for households, businesses, and other users of utility services. Added objectives in recent years, as I argue below, clash with those traditional objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"41 5","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Today's Rent-Seeking in Public Utility Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth W. Costello\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gas.22434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A current regulatory issue in the United States centers on the business model of utilities, which includes asking to what extent utilities should broaden their activities to satisfy society-wide political demands. There seems to be an inherent discordance between treating utilities as both a for-profit business and a purveyor of public goods. This tension complicates efforts to achieve a political equilibrium (i.e., a consensus) and retain the traditional objective of utility regulation to assure “just and reasonable” prices and reliable service for households, businesses, and other users of utility services. Added objectives in recent years, as I argue below, clash with those traditional objectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate and Energy\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"9-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate and Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gas.22434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gas.22434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国当前的一个监管问题集中在公用事业的商业模式上,其中包括公用事业应在多大程度上扩大其活动范围,以满足全社会的政治需求。将公用事业既视为营利性企业,又视为公共产品的提供者,这两者之间似乎存在固有的矛盾。这种矛盾使得实现政治平衡(即达成共识)和保留公用事业监管的传统目标(即确保为家庭、企业和其他公用事业服务用户提供 "公正合理 "的价格和可靠的服务)的努力变得更加复杂。正如我在下文中所论述的,近年来增加的目标与这些传统目标相冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Today's Rent-Seeking in Public Utility Regulation

A current regulatory issue in the United States centers on the business model of utilities, which includes asking to what extent utilities should broaden their activities to satisfy society-wide political demands. There seems to be an inherent discordance between treating utilities as both a for-profit business and a purveyor of public goods. This tension complicates efforts to achieve a political equilibrium (i.e., a consensus) and retain the traditional objective of utility regulation to assure “just and reasonable” prices and reliable service for households, businesses, and other users of utility services. Added objectives in recent years, as I argue below, clash with those traditional objectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信