术前口服富含大麻二酚的大麻提取物对牙髓治疗后焦虑和术后疼痛的影响:双盲随机临床试验。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Silmara de Andrade Silva, Christianne Velozo, Luiza de Almeida Souto Montenegro, Wesley Viana de Sousa, Marina da Cunha Isaltino, Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz, Diana Santana de Albuquerque
{"title":"术前口服富含大麻二酚的大麻提取物对牙髓治疗后焦虑和术后疼痛的影响:双盲随机临床试验。","authors":"Silmara de Andrade Silva, Christianne Velozo, Luiza de Almeida Souto Montenegro, Wesley Viana de Sousa, Marina da Cunha Isaltino, Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz, Diana Santana de Albuquerque","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cannabidiol-rich Cannabis extract in reducing anxiety and postoperative pain in patients submitted to endodontic treatment METHODS: The study was carried out after approval by the Research Ethics Committee (Registration No. 5.075.961). The following groups were tested: cannabidiol (CBD) and placebo. Pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before the start of treatment and 24, 48 and 72 h and 7 days after the session. Anxiety was assessed using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale and a VAS, before and immediately after treatment. In addition, salivary cortisol was measured before drug administration and after anesthesia. Data were analyzed descriptively using absolute frequencies and percentages, with a 5% margin of error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean anxiety scores were higher in the Cannabidiol group than in the placebo group in each assessment (pre: 5.06 versus 3.07, respectively; post: 4.61 versus 2.60). However, there was no significant difference in the reduction of dental anxiety at the beginning of the consultation and throughout the procedure. We did not find statistically significant differences in postoperative pain between the Cannabidiol and placebo groups at any of the time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no evidence of an exposure-response relationship between the intervention and control groups. However, more studies are needed to determine clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of preoperative oral cannabidiol-rich Cannabis extract on anxiety and postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Silmara de Andrade Silva, Christianne Velozo, Luiza de Almeida Souto Montenegro, Wesley Viana de Sousa, Marina da Cunha Isaltino, Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz, Diana Santana de Albuquerque\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joen.2024.10.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cannabidiol-rich Cannabis extract in reducing anxiety and postoperative pain in patients submitted to endodontic treatment METHODS: The study was carried out after approval by the Research Ethics Committee (Registration No. 5.075.961). The following groups were tested: cannabidiol (CBD) and placebo. Pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before the start of treatment and 24, 48 and 72 h and 7 days after the session. Anxiety was assessed using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale and a VAS, before and immediately after treatment. In addition, salivary cortisol was measured before drug administration and after anesthesia. Data were analyzed descriptively using absolute frequencies and percentages, with a 5% margin of error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean anxiety scores were higher in the Cannabidiol group than in the placebo group in each assessment (pre: 5.06 versus 3.07, respectively; post: 4.61 versus 2.60). However, there was no significant difference in the reduction of dental anxiety at the beginning of the consultation and throughout the procedure. We did not find statistically significant differences in postoperative pain between the Cannabidiol and placebo groups at any of the time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no evidence of an exposure-response relationship between the intervention and control groups. However, more studies are needed to determine clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2024.10.010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2024.10.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本研究旨在评估富含大麻二酚的大麻提取物在减轻牙髓治疗患者的焦虑和术后疼痛方面的效果 方法:本研究经研究伦理委员会(注册号:5.075.961)批准后进行。试验分为以下几组:大麻二酚(CBD)组和安慰剂组。在治疗开始前、治疗后 24、48、72 小时和 7 天内,使用视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 测量疼痛。在治疗前和治疗后立即使用改良牙科焦虑量表和 VAS 对焦虑进行评估。此外,还在用药前和麻醉后测量了唾液皮质醇。数据采用绝对频率和百分比进行描述性分析,误差率为 5%:在每次评估中,大麻二酚组的平均焦虑评分均高于安慰剂组(前:分别为 5.06 对 3.07;后:分别为 4.61 对 2.60)。然而,在咨询开始时和整个过程中,牙科焦虑的减轻程度没有明显差异。在任何一个时间点,我们都没有发现大麻二酚组和安慰剂组在术后疼痛方面有明显的统计学差异:结论:没有证据表明干预组和对照组之间存在暴露-反应关系。但是,还需要更多的研究来确定临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of preoperative oral cannabidiol-rich Cannabis extract on anxiety and postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cannabidiol-rich Cannabis extract in reducing anxiety and postoperative pain in patients submitted to endodontic treatment METHODS: The study was carried out after approval by the Research Ethics Committee (Registration No. 5.075.961). The following groups were tested: cannabidiol (CBD) and placebo. Pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before the start of treatment and 24, 48 and 72 h and 7 days after the session. Anxiety was assessed using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale and a VAS, before and immediately after treatment. In addition, salivary cortisol was measured before drug administration and after anesthesia. Data were analyzed descriptively using absolute frequencies and percentages, with a 5% margin of error.

Results: The mean anxiety scores were higher in the Cannabidiol group than in the placebo group in each assessment (pre: 5.06 versus 3.07, respectively; post: 4.61 versus 2.60). However, there was no significant difference in the reduction of dental anxiety at the beginning of the consultation and throughout the procedure. We did not find statistically significant differences in postoperative pain between the Cannabidiol and placebo groups at any of the time points.

Conclusion: There was no evidence of an exposure-response relationship between the intervention and control groups. However, more studies are needed to determine clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信