能量和营养物质消化率以及增加日粮中无壳燕麦替代小麦颗粒的添加量对断奶猪生长性能的影响

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Lingjun Zhu, Li Fang Wang, Sonja Bialobzyski, Ruurd T. Zijlstra, Eduardo Beltranena
{"title":"能量和营养物质消化率以及增加日粮中无壳燕麦替代小麦颗粒的添加量对断奶猪生长性能的影响","authors":"Lingjun Zhu,&nbsp;Li Fang Wang,&nbsp;Sonja Bialobzyski,&nbsp;Ruurd T. Zijlstra,&nbsp;Eduardo Beltranena","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To compare energy and nutrient digestibility, 3 diets including 95 % AC Gehl hull-less oats, CDC Utmost VB wheat or nitrogen-free were fed to 8 ileal cannulated pigs (30.2 ± 2.2 kg) over 3 periods (Exp. 1). To evaluate effects on growth performance, 160 weaned pigs (7.7 ± 0.4 kg) were fed 4 nursery diets over 28 days (Exp. 2). AC Gehl hull-less oats replaced CDC Utmost VB wheat at 0/3, 1/3, 2/3, and 3/3. Hull-less oats contained less fibre, more fat, Lys, Arg, Leu, Val but less Glu and Pro than wheat. In Exp. 1, feeding hull-less oats resulted in greater (P &lt; 0.05) coefficient of apparent ileal digestibility (CAID) and coefficient of apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter, digestible energy and predicted net energy value than wheat. Although CAID and coefficient of standardised ileal digestibility (CSID) of crude protein and most amino acids (AA) were lower (P &lt; 0.05) for pigs fed hull-less oats, CAID of Lys and most SID AA content were greater than wheat (P &lt; 0.05). In Exp. 2, feeding hull-less oats replacing wheat did not affect weekly pen average daily feed disappearance, average daily weight gain or body weight; however, overall gain-to-feed ratio decreased (P = 0.001) linearly (0.01 g/g per each 1/3 replacement). In conclusion, feeding AC Gehl hull-less oats resulted in lower CAID (except Lys) and CSID of AA, but greater SID AA content thus can fully replace CDC Utmost VB wheat grain in weanling pig diets without affecting most production parameters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"318 ","pages":"Article 116139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy and nutrient digestibility and effect of increasing the dietary inclusion of hull-less oats replacing wheat grain on growth performance of weanling pigs\",\"authors\":\"Lingjun Zhu,&nbsp;Li Fang Wang,&nbsp;Sonja Bialobzyski,&nbsp;Ruurd T. Zijlstra,&nbsp;Eduardo Beltranena\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To compare energy and nutrient digestibility, 3 diets including 95 % AC Gehl hull-less oats, CDC Utmost VB wheat or nitrogen-free were fed to 8 ileal cannulated pigs (30.2 ± 2.2 kg) over 3 periods (Exp. 1). To evaluate effects on growth performance, 160 weaned pigs (7.7 ± 0.4 kg) were fed 4 nursery diets over 28 days (Exp. 2). AC Gehl hull-less oats replaced CDC Utmost VB wheat at 0/3, 1/3, 2/3, and 3/3. Hull-less oats contained less fibre, more fat, Lys, Arg, Leu, Val but less Glu and Pro than wheat. In Exp. 1, feeding hull-less oats resulted in greater (P &lt; 0.05) coefficient of apparent ileal digestibility (CAID) and coefficient of apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter, digestible energy and predicted net energy value than wheat. Although CAID and coefficient of standardised ileal digestibility (CSID) of crude protein and most amino acids (AA) were lower (P &lt; 0.05) for pigs fed hull-less oats, CAID of Lys and most SID AA content were greater than wheat (P &lt; 0.05). In Exp. 2, feeding hull-less oats replacing wheat did not affect weekly pen average daily feed disappearance, average daily weight gain or body weight; however, overall gain-to-feed ratio decreased (P = 0.001) linearly (0.01 g/g per each 1/3 replacement). In conclusion, feeding AC Gehl hull-less oats resulted in lower CAID (except Lys) and CSID of AA, but greater SID AA content thus can fully replace CDC Utmost VB wheat grain in weanling pig diets without affecting most production parameters.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"318 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124002670\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124002670","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了比较能量和营养物质的消化率,8 头回肠插管猪(30.2 ± 2.2 千克)在 3 个时期内饲喂了 3 种日粮(包括 95 % AC Gehl 无壳燕麦、CDC Utmost VB 小麦或无氮日粮)(试验 1)。为了评估对生长性能的影响,对 160 头断奶猪(7.7 ± 0.4 千克)饲喂 4 种保育日粮 28 天(试验 2)。AC Gehl 无壳燕麦在 0/3、1/3、2/3 和 3/3 的比例中取代了 CDC Utmost VB 小麦。与小麦相比,无壳燕麦含有较少的纤维、较多的脂肪、Lys、Arg、Leu、Val,但较少的 Glu 和 Pro。在实验 1 中,与小麦相比,饲喂无壳燕麦可获得更大的(P < 0.05)表观回肠消化率系数(CAID)和干物质表观总消化率系数、可消化能和预测净能值。虽然饲喂无壳燕麦的猪粗蛋白和大多数氨基酸(AA)的CAID和标准化回肠消化率(CSID)系数较低(P < 0.05),但赖氨酸的CAID和大多数SID AA含量高于小麦(P < 0.05)。在实验 2 中,用无壳燕麦代替小麦饲喂并不影响周栏平均日饲料消失量、平均日增重或体重;但是,总体增重-饲料比呈线性下降(P = 0.001)(每更换 1/3 为 0.01 克/克)。总之,饲喂 AC Gehl 无壳燕麦可降低 AA 的 CAID(赖氨酸除外)和 CSID,但提高 SID AA 含量,因此可完全替代断奶仔猪日粮中的 CDC Utmost VB 小麦谷物,而不会影响大多数生产参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy and nutrient digestibility and effect of increasing the dietary inclusion of hull-less oats replacing wheat grain on growth performance of weanling pigs
To compare energy and nutrient digestibility, 3 diets including 95 % AC Gehl hull-less oats, CDC Utmost VB wheat or nitrogen-free were fed to 8 ileal cannulated pigs (30.2 ± 2.2 kg) over 3 periods (Exp. 1). To evaluate effects on growth performance, 160 weaned pigs (7.7 ± 0.4 kg) were fed 4 nursery diets over 28 days (Exp. 2). AC Gehl hull-less oats replaced CDC Utmost VB wheat at 0/3, 1/3, 2/3, and 3/3. Hull-less oats contained less fibre, more fat, Lys, Arg, Leu, Val but less Glu and Pro than wheat. In Exp. 1, feeding hull-less oats resulted in greater (P < 0.05) coefficient of apparent ileal digestibility (CAID) and coefficient of apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter, digestible energy and predicted net energy value than wheat. Although CAID and coefficient of standardised ileal digestibility (CSID) of crude protein and most amino acids (AA) were lower (P < 0.05) for pigs fed hull-less oats, CAID of Lys and most SID AA content were greater than wheat (P < 0.05). In Exp. 2, feeding hull-less oats replacing wheat did not affect weekly pen average daily feed disappearance, average daily weight gain or body weight; however, overall gain-to-feed ratio decreased (P = 0.001) linearly (0.01 g/g per each 1/3 replacement). In conclusion, feeding AC Gehl hull-less oats resulted in lower CAID (except Lys) and CSID of AA, but greater SID AA content thus can fully replace CDC Utmost VB wheat grain in weanling pig diets without affecting most production parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信