对 PACE 应用程序进行可用性测试,以支持家庭护理人员管理痴呆症患者的疼痛。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Nai-Ching Chi, Kristy Nguyen, Angela Shanahan, Ibrahim Demir, Ying-Kai Fu, Chih-Lin Chi, Yelena Perkhounkova, Maria Hein, Kathleen Buckwalter, Michael Wolf, Kristine Williams, Keela Herr
{"title":"对 PACE 应用程序进行可用性测试,以支持家庭护理人员管理痴呆症患者的疼痛。","authors":"Nai-Ching Chi, Kristy Nguyen, Angela Shanahan, Ibrahim Demir, Ying-Kai Fu, Chih-Lin Chi, Yelena Perkhounkova, Maria Hein, Kathleen Buckwalter, Michael Wolf, Kristine Williams, Keela Herr","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Pain management is often suboptimal in individuals with dementia, and their family caregivers are tasked with supporting pain management despite limited preparation. The web-based PACE-app (PAin Control Enhancement) was designed to assist caregivers in managing pain for individuals with dementia. This study aimed to evaluate the usability of the PACE-app.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used to evaluate the PACE-app's usability with 16 family caregivers and 6 healthcare professionals. Quantitative data were collected using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), while qualitative data were gathered through guided app reviews and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were thematically coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PSSUQ results indicated that both family caregivers and healthcare professionals had a highly positive experience with the PACE-app: overall scores (2.01 vs. 1.68), system usefulness (1.76 vs. 1.68), information quality (1.98 vs. 1.80), interface quality (2.30 vs. 1.60), and satisfaction (2.00 vs. 1.60) were rated on a 1-7 scale (with lower scores indicating better usability). Qualitative findings supported these results, with participants endorsing the PACE-app's usefulness, ease of use, learnability, effective information presentation, aesthetics, clear layout, and overall satisfaction. Participants also provided valuable feedback for improving information quality (enhancing clarity) and interface quality (real-time coaching on pain management).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The study demonstrated favorable usability and strong satisfaction among family caregivers and healthcare professionals using the PACE-app. Incorporating participants' suggestions will guide enhancements to the app's information and interface, ensuring it better meets users' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability Testing of the PACE-App to Support Family Caregivers in Managing Pain for People with Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Nai-Ching Chi, Kristy Nguyen, Angela Shanahan, Ibrahim Demir, Ying-Kai Fu, Chih-Lin Chi, Yelena Perkhounkova, Maria Hein, Kathleen Buckwalter, Michael Wolf, Kristine Williams, Keela Herr\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnae163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Pain management is often suboptimal in individuals with dementia, and their family caregivers are tasked with supporting pain management despite limited preparation. The web-based PACE-app (PAin Control Enhancement) was designed to assist caregivers in managing pain for individuals with dementia. This study aimed to evaluate the usability of the PACE-app.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used to evaluate the PACE-app's usability with 16 family caregivers and 6 healthcare professionals. Quantitative data were collected using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), while qualitative data were gathered through guided app reviews and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were thematically coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PSSUQ results indicated that both family caregivers and healthcare professionals had a highly positive experience with the PACE-app: overall scores (2.01 vs. 1.68), system usefulness (1.76 vs. 1.68), information quality (1.98 vs. 1.80), interface quality (2.30 vs. 1.60), and satisfaction (2.00 vs. 1.60) were rated on a 1-7 scale (with lower scores indicating better usability). Qualitative findings supported these results, with participants endorsing the PACE-app's usefulness, ease of use, learnability, effective information presentation, aesthetics, clear layout, and overall satisfaction. Participants also provided valuable feedback for improving information quality (enhancing clarity) and interface quality (real-time coaching on pain management).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The study demonstrated favorable usability and strong satisfaction among family caregivers and healthcare professionals using the PACE-app. Incorporating participants' suggestions will guide enhancements to the app's information and interface, ensuring it better meets users' needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae163\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:痴呆症患者的疼痛管理往往不尽如人意,而其家庭护理人员尽管准备有限,但仍承担着支持疼痛管理的任务。基于网络的 PACE 应用程序(疼痛控制增强)旨在帮助护理人员管理痴呆症患者的疼痛。本研究旨在评估 PACE-app 的可用性:研究设计和方法:采用收敛平行混合方法设计,对 16 名家庭护理人员和 6 名医疗保健专业人员进行了 PACE 应用程序可用性评估。定量数据通过 "研究后系统可用性问卷"(PSSUQ)收集,定性数据则通过指导性应用程序审查和半结构化访谈收集。对定量数据进行了描述性分析,对定性数据进行了主题编码:PSSUQ 结果表明,家庭护理人员和医疗保健专业人员对 PACE 应用程序都有非常积极的体验:总分(2.01 vs. 1.68)、系统实用性(1.76 vs. 1.68)、信息质量(1.98 vs. 1.80)、界面质量(2.30 vs. 1.60)和满意度(2.00 vs. 1.60)按 1-7 级评分(分数越低表示可用性越好)。定性研究结果支持上述结果,参与者对 PACE 应用程序的实用性、易用性、可学习性、有效的信息展示、美观性、清晰的布局和整体满意度表示认可。参与者还为提高信息质量(增强清晰度)和界面质量(疼痛管理的实时指导)提供了宝贵的反馈意见:该研究表明,PACE 应用程序在家庭护理人员和医疗保健专业人员中具有良好的可用性和较高的满意度。采纳参与者的建议将有助于改进应用程序的信息和界面,确保其更好地满足用户需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usability Testing of the PACE-App to Support Family Caregivers in Managing Pain for People with Dementia.

Background and objectives: Pain management is often suboptimal in individuals with dementia, and their family caregivers are tasked with supporting pain management despite limited preparation. The web-based PACE-app (PAin Control Enhancement) was designed to assist caregivers in managing pain for individuals with dementia. This study aimed to evaluate the usability of the PACE-app.

Research design and methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used to evaluate the PACE-app's usability with 16 family caregivers and 6 healthcare professionals. Quantitative data were collected using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), while qualitative data were gathered through guided app reviews and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were thematically coded.

Results: The PSSUQ results indicated that both family caregivers and healthcare professionals had a highly positive experience with the PACE-app: overall scores (2.01 vs. 1.68), system usefulness (1.76 vs. 1.68), information quality (1.98 vs. 1.80), interface quality (2.30 vs. 1.60), and satisfaction (2.00 vs. 1.60) were rated on a 1-7 scale (with lower scores indicating better usability). Qualitative findings supported these results, with participants endorsing the PACE-app's usefulness, ease of use, learnability, effective information presentation, aesthetics, clear layout, and overall satisfaction. Participants also provided valuable feedback for improving information quality (enhancing clarity) and interface quality (real-time coaching on pain management).

Discussion and implications: The study demonstrated favorable usability and strong satisfaction among family caregivers and healthcare professionals using the PACE-app. Incorporating participants' suggestions will guide enhancements to the app's information and interface, ensuring it better meets users' needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信