依达拉奉联合银杏叶提取物和双嘧达莫治疗急性脑梗塞的有效性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yangting Lyu, Bin Xu
{"title":"依达拉奉联合银杏叶提取物和双嘧达莫治疗急性脑梗塞的有效性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yangting Lyu, Bin Xu","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of edaravone combined with Ginkgo Leaf Extract and Dipyridamole (GLED) versus edaravone alone in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction (ACI) by the method of meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG DATA, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database were searched to identify publications on edaravone combined with GLED for ACI from inception to June 20, 2024. Stata15.0 statistical software was applied for data analysis. The test group was treated with edaravone combined with GLED, while the control group received edaravone alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 records were involved in this meta-analysis. The combined results exhibited that the effective rate of edaravone combined with GLED was significantly higher than that of edaravone in the treatment of ACI (relative risk = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-1.27, P < .001). The National Institute of Health stroke scale scores of edaravone combined with GLED were significantly lower than those of edaravone alone in the treatment of ACI (standardized mean difference = -1.93, 95% CI = -3.36 to -0.50, P = .008). The incidence of adverse reactions in the edaravone combined with GLED group was significantly lower than that in the edaravone alone group (relative risk = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33-0.70, P < .001) in the treatment of ACI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of edaravone with GLED for treating ACI has better efficacy and higher safety than edaravone alone. Given the limited number of studies identified and possibility of publication bias, the above findings should be verified by more high-quality trials in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of edaravone combined with Ginkgo Leaf Extract and Dipyridamole in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yangting Lyu, Bin Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000040223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of edaravone combined with Ginkgo Leaf Extract and Dipyridamole (GLED) versus edaravone alone in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction (ACI) by the method of meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG DATA, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database were searched to identify publications on edaravone combined with GLED for ACI from inception to June 20, 2024. Stata15.0 statistical software was applied for data analysis. The test group was treated with edaravone combined with GLED, while the control group received edaravone alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 records were involved in this meta-analysis. The combined results exhibited that the effective rate of edaravone combined with GLED was significantly higher than that of edaravone in the treatment of ACI (relative risk = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-1.27, P < .001). The National Institute of Health stroke scale scores of edaravone combined with GLED were significantly lower than those of edaravone alone in the treatment of ACI (standardized mean difference = -1.93, 95% CI = -3.36 to -0.50, P = .008). The incidence of adverse reactions in the edaravone combined with GLED group was significantly lower than that in the edaravone alone group (relative risk = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33-0.70, P < .001) in the treatment of ACI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of edaravone with GLED for treating ACI has better efficacy and higher safety than edaravone alone. Given the limited number of studies identified and possibility of publication bias, the above findings should be verified by more high-quality trials in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537593/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景采用荟萃分析法评价依达拉奉联合银杏叶提取物和双嘧达莫治疗急性脑梗死(ACI)与单纯依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效和安全性:方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据和中国科技期刊数据库,以确定从开始到2024年6月20日期间有关依达拉奉联合GLED治疗急性脑梗死的文献。应用Stata15.0统计软件进行数据分析。试验组接受依达拉奉联合 GLED 治疗,对照组单独接受依达拉奉治疗:本次荟萃分析共涉及 12 条记录。综合结果显示,依达拉奉联合 GLED 治疗 ACI 的有效率显著高于依达拉奉(相对风险 = 1.21,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.15-1.27,P 结论:依达拉奉联合 GLED 治疗 ACI 的有效率显著高于依达拉奉(相对风险 = 1.21,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.15-1.27,P 结论):依达拉奉联合 GLED 治疗 ACI 比单独使用依达拉奉疗效更好,安全性更高。鉴于所发现的研究数量有限且可能存在发表偏倚,未来应通过更多高质量的试验来验证上述发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of edaravone combined with Ginkgo Leaf Extract and Dipyridamole in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of edaravone combined with Ginkgo Leaf Extract and Dipyridamole (GLED) versus edaravone alone in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction (ACI) by the method of meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG DATA, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database were searched to identify publications on edaravone combined with GLED for ACI from inception to June 20, 2024. Stata15.0 statistical software was applied for data analysis. The test group was treated with edaravone combined with GLED, while the control group received edaravone alone.

Results: A total of 12 records were involved in this meta-analysis. The combined results exhibited that the effective rate of edaravone combined with GLED was significantly higher than that of edaravone in the treatment of ACI (relative risk = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-1.27, P < .001). The National Institute of Health stroke scale scores of edaravone combined with GLED were significantly lower than those of edaravone alone in the treatment of ACI (standardized mean difference = -1.93, 95% CI = -3.36 to -0.50, P = .008). The incidence of adverse reactions in the edaravone combined with GLED group was significantly lower than that in the edaravone alone group (relative risk = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33-0.70, P < .001) in the treatment of ACI.

Conclusion: The combination of edaravone with GLED for treating ACI has better efficacy and higher safety than edaravone alone. Given the limited number of studies identified and possibility of publication bias, the above findings should be verified by more high-quality trials in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信