杜匹单抗可明显改善慢性自发性荨麻疹患者的瘙痒和荨麻疹症状(CUPID C 研究)

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
T. Casale , S. Saini , J. Bernstein , A. Giménez -Arnau , D. Bauer , N. Amin , L. Robinson , P. Dakin , E. Laws , A. Radin , M. Makhija
{"title":"杜匹单抗可明显改善慢性自发性荨麻疹患者的瘙痒和荨麻疹症状(CUPID C 研究)","authors":"T. Casale ,&nbsp;S. Saini ,&nbsp;J. Bernstein ,&nbsp;A. Giménez -Arnau ,&nbsp;D. Bauer ,&nbsp;N. Amin ,&nbsp;L. Robinson ,&nbsp;P. Dakin ,&nbsp;E. Laws ,&nbsp;A. Radin ,&nbsp;M. Makhija","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can be difficult to manage with many patients experiencing inadequate disease control despite treatment with H1-antihistamines.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study C (NCT04180488), a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 24-week phase III trial compared dupilumab with placebo treatment in omalizumab-naive patients with symptomatic CSU despite standard-of-care H1-antihistamines treatment (up to 4-fold approved dose) (n = 151, age ≥ 6 years). Patients were randomized to receive add-on dupilumab 300 mg (adults and adolescents ≥ 60 kg) or 200 mg (adolescents &lt; 60 kg, children ≥ 30 kg) (n = 74) or matching placebo (n = 77) subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Efficacy endpoints included Itch Severity Score over 7 days (ISS7, range: 0-21) and Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7, range: 0-42). Safety and tolerability were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dupilumab significantly improved ISS7 and UAS7 vs placebo at week 24 (least squares mean change in ISS7 from baseline: −8.6 dupilumab vs −6.1 placebo; difference: −2.5, <em>P</em> = .02; least squares mean change in UAS7: −15.9 dupilumab vs −11.2 placebo; difference: –4.7, <em>P</em> = .02). A higher proportion of patients receiving dupilumab achieved well-controlled disease status (UAS ≤ 6: 41% dupilumab vs 23% placebo, odds ratio = 2.7, <em>P</em> = .005) or complete response (UAS = 0: 30% dupilumab vs 18% placebo, odds ratio = 2.7, <em>P</em> = .02) at week 24 compared with placebo. Overall rates of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events were the same for both groups (53%). Safety was generally consistent with the known safety profile of dupilumab.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dupilumab significantly reduced itch and urticaria in patients with CSU who were uncontrolled with H1-antihistamine therapy. This research was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc and was compliant with GPPG.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":"133 6","pages":"Page S2"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dupilumab significantly improves itch and hives in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CUPID study C)\",\"authors\":\"T. Casale ,&nbsp;S. Saini ,&nbsp;J. Bernstein ,&nbsp;A. Giménez -Arnau ,&nbsp;D. Bauer ,&nbsp;N. Amin ,&nbsp;L. Robinson ,&nbsp;P. Dakin ,&nbsp;E. Laws ,&nbsp;A. Radin ,&nbsp;M. Makhija\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anai.2024.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can be difficult to manage with many patients experiencing inadequate disease control despite treatment with H1-antihistamines.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study C (NCT04180488), a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 24-week phase III trial compared dupilumab with placebo treatment in omalizumab-naive patients with symptomatic CSU despite standard-of-care H1-antihistamines treatment (up to 4-fold approved dose) (n = 151, age ≥ 6 years). Patients were randomized to receive add-on dupilumab 300 mg (adults and adolescents ≥ 60 kg) or 200 mg (adolescents &lt; 60 kg, children ≥ 30 kg) (n = 74) or matching placebo (n = 77) subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Efficacy endpoints included Itch Severity Score over 7 days (ISS7, range: 0-21) and Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7, range: 0-42). Safety and tolerability were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dupilumab significantly improved ISS7 and UAS7 vs placebo at week 24 (least squares mean change in ISS7 from baseline: −8.6 dupilumab vs −6.1 placebo; difference: −2.5, <em>P</em> = .02; least squares mean change in UAS7: −15.9 dupilumab vs −11.2 placebo; difference: –4.7, <em>P</em> = .02). A higher proportion of patients receiving dupilumab achieved well-controlled disease status (UAS ≤ 6: 41% dupilumab vs 23% placebo, odds ratio = 2.7, <em>P</em> = .005) or complete response (UAS = 0: 30% dupilumab vs 18% placebo, odds ratio = 2.7, <em>P</em> = .02) at week 24 compared with placebo. Overall rates of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events were the same for both groups (53%). Safety was generally consistent with the known safety profile of dupilumab.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dupilumab significantly reduced itch and urticaria in patients with CSU who were uncontrolled with H1-antihistamine therapy. This research was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc and was compliant with GPPG.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"volume\":\"133 6\",\"pages\":\"Page S2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120624015643\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120624015643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)很难控制,许多患者尽管接受了H1-抗组胺药治疗,但病情控制不佳。方法LIBERTY-CSU CUPID研究C(NCT04180488)是一项为期24周的随机、安慰剂对照、双盲III期试验,该试验比较了对奥马珠单抗无效的症状性CSU患者(n=151,年龄≥6岁)在接受标准H1-抗组胺药物治疗(最高为批准剂量的4倍)后的杜匹单抗与安慰剂治疗。患者随机接受300毫克(成人和体重≥60千克的青少年)或200毫克(体重≥60千克的青少年和体重≥30千克的儿童)(n = 74)或匹配安慰剂(n = 77),每2周皮下注射一次。疗效终点包括7天内瘙痒严重程度评分(ISS7,范围:0-21)和7天内荨麻疹活动评分(UAS7,范围:0-42)。对安全性和耐受性进行了评估。结果 第24周时,与安慰剂相比,杜匹单抗明显改善了ISS7和UAS7(ISS7与基线相比的最小二乘法平均变化为-8.6dupilumab):-与安慰剂相比,第24周时杜匹单抗明显改善了ISS7和UAS7(ISS7与基线相比的最小二乘法平均变化:-8.6,P = .1):-2.5,P = .02;UAS7 的最小二乘法平均变化:-15.9 dupilumab vs. -6.1安慰剂;差异:-2.5,P = .02-与安慰剂相比;差异:-4.7,P = .02:-4.7, P = .02).与安慰剂相比,接受杜比鲁单抗治疗的患者在第24周达到疾病控制良好状态(UAS≤6:41%的杜比鲁单抗 vs 23%的安慰剂,几率比=2.7,P=.005)或完全应答(UAS=0:30%的杜比鲁单抗 vs 18%的安慰剂,几率比=2.7,P=.02)的比例更高。两组患者出现治疗突发不良事件的总体比例相同(53%)。安全性与dupilumab的已知安全性基本一致。结论Dupilumab能显著减轻H1-抗组胺药物治疗无法控制的CSU患者的瘙痒和荨麻疹。本研究由赛诺菲和再生元制药公司赞助,符合 GPPG 标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dupilumab significantly improves itch and hives in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CUPID study C)

Background

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can be difficult to manage with many patients experiencing inadequate disease control despite treatment with H1-antihistamines.

Methods

LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Study C (NCT04180488), a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 24-week phase III trial compared dupilumab with placebo treatment in omalizumab-naive patients with symptomatic CSU despite standard-of-care H1-antihistamines treatment (up to 4-fold approved dose) (n = 151, age ≥ 6 years). Patients were randomized to receive add-on dupilumab 300 mg (adults and adolescents ≥ 60 kg) or 200 mg (adolescents < 60 kg, children ≥ 30 kg) (n = 74) or matching placebo (n = 77) subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Efficacy endpoints included Itch Severity Score over 7 days (ISS7, range: 0-21) and Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7, range: 0-42). Safety and tolerability were assessed.

Results

Dupilumab significantly improved ISS7 and UAS7 vs placebo at week 24 (least squares mean change in ISS7 from baseline: −8.6 dupilumab vs −6.1 placebo; difference: −2.5, P = .02; least squares mean change in UAS7: −15.9 dupilumab vs −11.2 placebo; difference: –4.7, P = .02). A higher proportion of patients receiving dupilumab achieved well-controlled disease status (UAS ≤ 6: 41% dupilumab vs 23% placebo, odds ratio = 2.7, P = .005) or complete response (UAS = 0: 30% dupilumab vs 18% placebo, odds ratio = 2.7, P = .02) at week 24 compared with placebo. Overall rates of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events were the same for both groups (53%). Safety was generally consistent with the known safety profile of dupilumab.

Conclusion

Dupilumab significantly reduced itch and urticaria in patients with CSU who were uncontrolled with H1-antihistamine therapy. This research was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc and was compliant with GPPG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信