以解决方案为重点的简短疗法的现有证据：社会心理成果和调节因素的荟萃分析。

IF 13.7 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102512

E. Vermeulen-Oskam , C. Franklin , L.P.M. van’t Hof , G.J.J.M. Stams , E.S. van Vugt , M. Assink , E.J. Veltman , A.S. Froerer , J.P.C. Staaks , A. Zhang

{"title":"以解决方案为重点的简短疗法的现有证据：社会心理成果和调节因素的荟萃分析。","authors":"E. Vermeulen-Oskam , C. Franklin , L.P.M. van’t Hof , G.J.J.M. Stams , E.S. van Vugt , M. Assink , E.J. Veltman , A.S. Froerer , J.P.C. Staaks , A. Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) focuses on the strengths and resources of clients, and is assumed to achieve positive results on various psychosocial outcomes. This meta-analysis is an extension of previous meta-analyses on SFBT, and examines if the effectiveness of SFBT is influenced by participant, intervention, study and publication characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Experimental and quasi-experimental studies were included. A three-level meta-analysis was performed on 72 studies and 489 effect sizes, accounting for within and between study differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall effect of SFBT on psychosocial problems was large (<em>g</em> = 1.17). Moderator analyses revealed larger effects of SFBT in non-clinical samples (<em>g</em> = 1.50) than in clinical samples (<em>g</em> = 0.78). Studies with treatment-as-usual (TAU) as control condition reported smaller effects (<em>g</em> = 0.58) than studies with a no-treatment control condition (<em>g</em> = 1.59). Relatively large effects were found for couples (<em>g</em> = 3.02) compared to other client groups (0.41 < <em>g</em> < 1.70), and marital functioning (<em>g</em> = 3.02) compared to other outcomes (0.23 < <em>g</em> < 1.31). Group therapy (<em>g</em> = 1.64) yielded a larger effect than individual therapy (<em>g</em> = 0.48).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings indicate that SFBT is applicable for a variety of clients and psychosocial problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102512"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The current evidence of solution-focused brief therapy: A meta-analysis of psychosocial outcomes and moderating factors\",\"authors\":\"E. Vermeulen-Oskam , C. Franklin , L.P.M. van’t Hof , G.J.J.M. Stams , E.S. van Vugt , M. Assink , E.J. Veltman , A.S. Froerer , J.P.C. Staaks , A. Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) focuses on the strengths and resources of clients, and is assumed to achieve positive results on various psychosocial outcomes. This meta-analysis is an extension of previous meta-analyses on SFBT, and examines if the effectiveness of SFBT is influenced by participant, intervention, study and publication characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Experimental and quasi-experimental studies were included. A three-level meta-analysis was performed on 72 studies and 489 effect sizes, accounting for within and between study differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall effect of SFBT on psychosocial problems was large (<em>g</em> = 1.17). Moderator analyses revealed larger effects of SFBT in non-clinical samples (<em>g</em> = 1.50) than in clinical samples (<em>g</em> = 0.78). Studies with treatment-as-usual (TAU) as control condition reported smaller effects (<em>g</em> = 0.58) than studies with a no-treatment control condition (<em>g</em> = 1.59). Relatively large effects were found for couples (<em>g</em> = 3.02) compared to other client groups (0.41 < <em>g</em> < 1.70), and marital functioning (<em>g</em> = 3.02) compared to other outcomes (0.23 < <em>g</em> < 1.31). Group therapy (<em>g</em> = 1.64) yielded a larger effect than individual therapy (<em>g</em> = 0.48).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings indicate that SFBT is applicable for a variety of clients and psychosocial problems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001338\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001338","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：以解决问题为重点的简易疗法（SFBT）关注客户的优势和资源，被认为能在各种社会心理结果上取得积极效果。本荟萃分析是对之前有关 SFBT 的荟萃分析的延伸，旨在研究 SFBT 的有效性是否受参与者、干预、研究和出版特征的影响：方法：纳入实验和准实验研究。方法：纳入实验和准实验研究，对 72 项研究和 489 个效应大小进行了三级荟萃分析，并考虑了研究内部和研究之间的差异：结果：SFBT 对社会心理问题的总体影响较大（g = 1.17）。主持人分析显示，SFBT 在非临床样本中的效应（g = 1.50）大于在临床样本中的效应（g = 0.78）。将 "常规治疗"（TAU）作为对照条件的研究报告的效果（g = 0.58）小于无治疗对照条件的研究报告的效果（g = 1.59）。与其他客户群体（0.41）相比，夫妻群体（g = 3.02）的效果相对较大：研究结果表明，SFBT 适用于各种客户和社会心理问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The current evidence of solution-focused brief therapy: A meta-analysis of psychosocial outcomes and moderating factors

Purpose

Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) focuses on the strengths and resources of clients, and is assumed to achieve positive results on various psychosocial outcomes. This meta-analysis is an extension of previous meta-analyses on SFBT, and examines if the effectiveness of SFBT is influenced by participant, intervention, study and publication characteristics.

Methods

Experimental and quasi-experimental studies were included. A three-level meta-analysis was performed on 72 studies and 489 effect sizes, accounting for within and between study differences.

Results

The overall effect of SFBT on psychosocial problems was large (g = 1.17). Moderator analyses revealed larger effects of SFBT in non-clinical samples (g = 1.50) than in clinical samples (g = 0.78). Studies with treatment-as-usual (TAU) as control condition reported smaller effects (g = 0.58) than studies with a no-treatment control condition (g = 1.59). Relatively large effects were found for couples (g = 3.02) compared to other client groups (0.41 < g < 1.70), and marital functioning (g = 3.02) compared to other outcomes (0.23 < g < 1.31). Group therapy (g = 1.64) yielded a larger effect than individual therapy (g = 0.48).

Conclusion

The findings indicate that SFBT is applicable for a variety of clients and psychosocial problems.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

23.10

自引率

1.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.