使用德尔菲法开发预防医疗器械相关压伤的护理包:护理包开发研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Erhan Elmaoğlu, Zerrin Çiğdem
{"title":"使用德尔菲法开发预防医疗器械相关压伤的护理包:护理包开发研究。","authors":"Erhan Elmaoğlu, Zerrin Çiğdem","doi":"10.1111/jep.14193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose is to develop a care package for the prevention of medical device-related pressure injuries using the Delphi Method.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study is a methodological.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The care package was developed using the Delphi Method, a consensus-based technique. Two expert groups were selected to develop the care package to prevent medical device-related pressure injuries. The invitation letter and the questionnaire consisting of two questions were sent to the relevant experts via email and completed in three rounds after receiving responses. The scores from the experts were uploaded to the SPSS 25.0 software package. The range (R) was calculated as R = Q3-Q1. The differences (R) between the quartiles were examined. Items with R < 1.2 were accepted as having reached a consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a result of the evaluation, it was organized as 83 items. As a result of the analysis of the scores of the second round of the Delphi Method, the range values of each item were examined. In the third round of the Delphi Method, it was found that consensus was reached in the third round on items 18, 29, and 56, on which consensus could not be reached in the second round, and the care package was accepted with 83 items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An 83-item care package was created to prevent medical device-related pressure injuries in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a care package to prevent medical device-related pressure injuries using the Delphi Method: A maintenance care package development study.\",\"authors\":\"Erhan Elmaoğlu, Zerrin Çiğdem\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose is to develop a care package for the prevention of medical device-related pressure injuries using the Delphi Method.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study is a methodological.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The care package was developed using the Delphi Method, a consensus-based technique. Two expert groups were selected to develop the care package to prevent medical device-related pressure injuries. The invitation letter and the questionnaire consisting of two questions were sent to the relevant experts via email and completed in three rounds after receiving responses. The scores from the experts were uploaded to the SPSS 25.0 software package. The range (R) was calculated as R = Q3-Q1. The differences (R) between the quartiles were examined. Items with R < 1.2 were accepted as having reached a consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a result of the evaluation, it was organized as 83 items. As a result of the analysis of the scores of the second round of the Delphi Method, the range values of each item were examined. In the third round of the Delphi Method, it was found that consensus was reached in the third round on items 18, 29, and 56, on which consensus could not be reached in the second round, and the care package was accepted with 83 items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An 83-item care package was created to prevent medical device-related pressure injuries in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14193\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用德尔菲法制定一套预防医疗器械相关压力伤害的护理方案:本研究是一项方法学研究:方法:采用德尔菲法(一种基于共识的技术)制定护理包。选择了两个专家组来制定预防医疗器械相关压力损伤的护理包。邀请函和由两个问题组成的调查问卷通过电子邮件发送给相关专家,收到回复后分三轮完成。专家们的评分被上传到 SPSS 25.0 软件包中。计算范围(R)为 R = Q3-Q1。研究了四分位数之间的差异(R)。有 R 结果的项目:评估结果为 83 个项目。在对第二轮德尔菲法的得分进行分析后,研究了每个项目的范围值。在第三轮德尔菲法中,发现在第二轮德尔菲法中未能达成共识的第 18、29 和 56 项在第三轮德尔菲法中达成了共识,护理包被接受为 83 项:结论:为预防与医疗器械相关的儿童压力性损伤,制定了一套包含 83 个项目的护理包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a care package to prevent medical device-related pressure injuries using the Delphi Method: A maintenance care package development study.

Aim: The purpose is to develop a care package for the prevention of medical device-related pressure injuries using the Delphi Method.

Design: The study is a methodological.

Method: The care package was developed using the Delphi Method, a consensus-based technique. Two expert groups were selected to develop the care package to prevent medical device-related pressure injuries. The invitation letter and the questionnaire consisting of two questions were sent to the relevant experts via email and completed in three rounds after receiving responses. The scores from the experts were uploaded to the SPSS 25.0 software package. The range (R) was calculated as R = Q3-Q1. The differences (R) between the quartiles were examined. Items with R < 1.2 were accepted as having reached a consensus.

Results: As a result of the evaluation, it was organized as 83 items. As a result of the analysis of the scores of the second round of the Delphi Method, the range values of each item were examined. In the third round of the Delphi Method, it was found that consensus was reached in the third round on items 18, 29, and 56, on which consensus could not be reached in the second round, and the care package was accepted with 83 items.

Conclusion: An 83-item care package was created to prevent medical device-related pressure injuries in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信