减少轻微头部外伤儿童成像的干预措施:系统回顾。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Nick Lesyk, Scott W Kirkland, Cristina Villa-Roel, Sandra Campbell, Lynette D Krebs, Bill Sevcik, Nana Owusu Essel, Brian H Rowe
{"title":"减少轻微头部外伤儿童成像的干预措施:系统回顾。","authors":"Nick Lesyk, Scott W Kirkland, Cristina Villa-Roel, Sandra Campbell, Lynette D Krebs, Bill Sevcik, Nana Owusu Essel, Brian H Rowe","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-066955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Reducing unnecessary imaging in emergency departments (EDs) for children with minor traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) has been encouraged.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to systematically review the effectiveness of interventions to decrease imaging in this population.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Eight electronic databases and the gray literature were searched.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Comparative studies assessing ED interventions to reduce imaging in children with mTBIs were eligible.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two independent reviewers screened studies, completed a quality assessment, and extracted data. The median of relative risks with interquartile range (IQR) are reported. A multivariable metaregression identified predictors of relative change in imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies were included, and most (79%) used before-after designs. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule was the most common intervention (71%); most studies (75%) used multifaceted interventions (median components: 3; IQR: 1.75 to 4). Before-after studies assessing multi-faceted PECARN interventions reported decreased computed tomography (CT) head imaging (relative risk = 0.73; IQR: 0.60 to 0.89). Higher baseline imagine (P < .001) and additional intervention components (P = .008) were associated with larger imaging decreases.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The limitations of this study include the inconsistent reporting of important outcomes and that the results are based on non-randomized studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing interventions in EDs with high baseline CT ordering using complex interventions was more likely to reduce head imaging in children with mTBIs. Including the PECARN decision rule in the intervention strategy decreased orders by a median of 27%. Further research could provide insight into which specific factors influence successful implementation and sustained effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to Reduce Imaging in Children With Minor Traumatic Head Injury: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nick Lesyk, Scott W Kirkland, Cristina Villa-Roel, Sandra Campbell, Lynette D Krebs, Bill Sevcik, Nana Owusu Essel, Brian H Rowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2024-066955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Reducing unnecessary imaging in emergency departments (EDs) for children with minor traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) has been encouraged.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to systematically review the effectiveness of interventions to decrease imaging in this population.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Eight electronic databases and the gray literature were searched.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Comparative studies assessing ED interventions to reduce imaging in children with mTBIs were eligible.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two independent reviewers screened studies, completed a quality assessment, and extracted data. The median of relative risks with interquartile range (IQR) are reported. A multivariable metaregression identified predictors of relative change in imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies were included, and most (79%) used before-after designs. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule was the most common intervention (71%); most studies (75%) used multifaceted interventions (median components: 3; IQR: 1.75 to 4). Before-after studies assessing multi-faceted PECARN interventions reported decreased computed tomography (CT) head imaging (relative risk = 0.73; IQR: 0.60 to 0.89). Higher baseline imagine (P < .001) and additional intervention components (P = .008) were associated with larger imaging decreases.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The limitations of this study include the inconsistent reporting of important outcomes and that the results are based on non-randomized studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing interventions in EDs with high baseline CT ordering using complex interventions was more likely to reduce head imaging in children with mTBIs. Including the PECARN decision rule in the intervention strategy decreased orders by a median of 27%. Further research could provide insight into which specific factors influence successful implementation and sustained effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066955\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066955","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:减少急诊科(ED)对轻微脑外伤(mTBI)儿童进行不必要的影像学检查一直受到鼓励:我们的目标是系统回顾减少该人群影像学检查的干预措施的有效性:数据来源:检索了八个电子数据库和灰色文献:符合条件的研究均为评估 ED 干预措施以减少 mTBIs 患儿成像的比较性研究:两名独立审稿人筛选了研究,完成了质量评估,并提取了数据。报告了相对风险的中位数和四分位距(IQR)。多变量元回归确定了影像学相对变化的预测因素:结果:共纳入 28 项研究,其中大部分(79%)采用前后对比设计。儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECARN)规则是最常见的干预措施(71%);大多数研究(75%)使用了多方面干预措施(中位数:3;IQR:1.75 至 4)。评估多方面 PECARN 干预措施的前后研究报告称,计算机断层扫描 (CT) 头部成像结果有所下降(相对风险 = 0.73;IQR:0.60 至 0.89)。较高的基线想象(P < .001)和额外的干预内容(P = .008)与成像下降幅度较大有关:本研究的局限性包括对重要结果的报告不一致,以及研究结果基于非随机研究:结论:在基线 CT 订单量较高的急诊室使用复杂干预措施更有可能减少 mTBI 儿童的头部成像。在干预策略中纳入PECARN决策规则可使订单减少27%。进一步的研究可以深入了解哪些具体因素会影响干预措施的成功实施和持续效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventions to Reduce Imaging in Children With Minor Traumatic Head Injury: A Systematic Review.

Context: Reducing unnecessary imaging in emergency departments (EDs) for children with minor traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) has been encouraged.

Objective: Our objective was to systematically review the effectiveness of interventions to decrease imaging in this population.

Data sources: Eight electronic databases and the gray literature were searched.

Study selection: Comparative studies assessing ED interventions to reduce imaging in children with mTBIs were eligible.

Data extraction: Two independent reviewers screened studies, completed a quality assessment, and extracted data. The median of relative risks with interquartile range (IQR) are reported. A multivariable metaregression identified predictors of relative change in imaging.

Results: Twenty-eight studies were included, and most (79%) used before-after designs. The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule was the most common intervention (71%); most studies (75%) used multifaceted interventions (median components: 3; IQR: 1.75 to 4). Before-after studies assessing multi-faceted PECARN interventions reported decreased computed tomography (CT) head imaging (relative risk = 0.73; IQR: 0.60 to 0.89). Higher baseline imagine (P < .001) and additional intervention components (P = .008) were associated with larger imaging decreases.

Limitations: The limitations of this study include the inconsistent reporting of important outcomes and that the results are based on non-randomized studies.

Conclusions: Implementing interventions in EDs with high baseline CT ordering using complex interventions was more likely to reduce head imaging in children with mTBIs. Including the PECARN decision rule in the intervention strategy decreased orders by a median of 27%. Further research could provide insight into which specific factors influence successful implementation and sustained effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatrics
Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
791
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field. The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability. Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights. As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信