低频重复经颅磁刺激对不同运动诱发电位状态的亚急性中风患者运动恢复的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1460925
Wenjun Qian, Xiaoyu Liao, Xiaowen Ju, Yaxin Gao, Miao Wu, Chen Xie, Yaoying Zhang, Xianming Long, Surong Qian, Yan Gong
{"title":"低频重复经颅磁刺激对不同运动诱发电位状态的亚急性中风患者运动恢复的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Wenjun Qian, Xiaoyu Liao, Xiaowen Ju, Yaxin Gao, Miao Wu, Chen Xie, Yaoying Zhang, Xianming Long, Surong Qian, Yan Gong","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1460925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) on motor function and cortical excitability in stroke patients with different motor evoked potential (MEP) status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 80 stroke patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial and divided into two groups according to MEP status (- or +) of lesioned hemisphere. Then, each group was randomly assigned to receive either active or sham LF-rTMS. In addition to conventional rehabilitation, all participants received 20 sessions of rTMS at 1 Hz frequency through the active or the sham coil over 4 weeks. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension (SAFE) and Barthel Index (BI), bilateral resting motor threshold (rMT), amplitude of Motor evoked potential (MEP) and Central Motor Conduction Time (CMCT), and Interhemispheric asymmetry (IHA) were blindly assessed at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 4 weeks after intervention, FMA and NIHSS changed scores in 1 Hz MEP(+) group were significantly higher than those in the other three groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). After receiving 1 Hz rTMS, stroke patients with MEP(+) showed significant changes in their bilateral cortical excitability (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 8 weeks after intervention, 1 Hz MEP(+) group experienced higher changes in NIHSS, FMA, SAFE, and BI scores than other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, 1 Hz rTMS intervention could decrease unaffected cortical excitability and enhance affected cortical excitability of stroke patients with MEP(+) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The correlation analysis revealed that FMA motor change score was associated with decreased unaffected MEP amplitude (<i>r</i> = -0.401, <i>p</i> = 0.010) and decreased affected rMT (<i>r</i> = -0.584, <i>p</i> < 0.001) from baseline, which was only observed in the MEP(+) group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effects of LF-rTMS on motor recovery and cortical excitability were more effective in stroke patients with MEP than those with no MEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1460925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients with different motor evoked potential status: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Wenjun Qian, Xiaoyu Liao, Xiaowen Ju, Yaxin Gao, Miao Wu, Chen Xie, Yaoying Zhang, Xianming Long, Surong Qian, Yan Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneur.2024.1460925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) on motor function and cortical excitability in stroke patients with different motor evoked potential (MEP) status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 80 stroke patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial and divided into two groups according to MEP status (- or +) of lesioned hemisphere. Then, each group was randomly assigned to receive either active or sham LF-rTMS. In addition to conventional rehabilitation, all participants received 20 sessions of rTMS at 1 Hz frequency through the active or the sham coil over 4 weeks. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension (SAFE) and Barthel Index (BI), bilateral resting motor threshold (rMT), amplitude of Motor evoked potential (MEP) and Central Motor Conduction Time (CMCT), and Interhemispheric asymmetry (IHA) were blindly assessed at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 4 weeks after intervention, FMA and NIHSS changed scores in 1 Hz MEP(+) group were significantly higher than those in the other three groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). After receiving 1 Hz rTMS, stroke patients with MEP(+) showed significant changes in their bilateral cortical excitability (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 8 weeks after intervention, 1 Hz MEP(+) group experienced higher changes in NIHSS, FMA, SAFE, and BI scores than other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, 1 Hz rTMS intervention could decrease unaffected cortical excitability and enhance affected cortical excitability of stroke patients with MEP(+) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The correlation analysis revealed that FMA motor change score was associated with decreased unaffected MEP amplitude (<i>r</i> = -0.401, <i>p</i> = 0.010) and decreased affected rMT (<i>r</i> = -0.584, <i>p</i> < 0.001) from baseline, which was only observed in the MEP(+) group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effects of LF-rTMS on motor recovery and cortical excitability were more effective in stroke patients with MEP than those with no MEP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1460925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524934/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1460925\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1460925","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的探讨低频重复经颅磁刺激(LF-rTMS)对不同运动诱发电位(MEP)状态的脑卒中患者运动功能和皮层兴奋性的影响:本随机对照试验共纳入 80 名脑卒中患者,并根据病变半球的运动诱发电位状态(- 或 +)分为两组。然后,每组患者被随机分配接受主动或假性 LF-rTMS 治疗。除常规康复治疗外,所有参与者还在4周内接受了20次通过主动或假线圈进行的频率为1赫兹的经颅磁刺激治疗。分别在基线、治疗后4周和8周对福格尔-迈耶评估(FMA)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、肩外展指伸(SAFE)和巴特尔指数(BI)、双侧静息运动阈值(rMT)、运动诱发电位(MEP)振幅和中枢运动传导时间(CMCT)以及半球间不对称性(IHA)进行盲法评估:干预4周后,1 Hz MEP(+)组的FMA和NIHSS变化评分显著高于其他三组(p p p p r = -0.401, p = 0.010),且受rMT影响的评分下降(r = -0.584, p 结论:低频经颅磁刺激对NIHSS变化评分有显著影响:低频经颅磁刺激对有 MEP 的脑卒中患者的运动恢复和皮层兴奋性的影响比无 MEP 的患者更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients with different motor evoked potential status: a randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: To explore the effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) on motor function and cortical excitability in stroke patients with different motor evoked potential (MEP) status.

Methods: A total of 80 stroke patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial and divided into two groups according to MEP status (- or +) of lesioned hemisphere. Then, each group was randomly assigned to receive either active or sham LF-rTMS. In addition to conventional rehabilitation, all participants received 20 sessions of rTMS at 1 Hz frequency through the active or the sham coil over 4 weeks. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension (SAFE) and Barthel Index (BI), bilateral resting motor threshold (rMT), amplitude of Motor evoked potential (MEP) and Central Motor Conduction Time (CMCT), and Interhemispheric asymmetry (IHA) were blindly assessed at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment, respectively.

Results: At 4 weeks after intervention, FMA and NIHSS changed scores in 1 Hz MEP(+) group were significantly higher than those in the other three groups (p < 0.001). After receiving 1 Hz rTMS, stroke patients with MEP(+) showed significant changes in their bilateral cortical excitability (p < 0.05). At 8 weeks after intervention, 1 Hz MEP(+) group experienced higher changes in NIHSS, FMA, SAFE, and BI scores than other groups (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 1 Hz rTMS intervention could decrease unaffected cortical excitability and enhance affected cortical excitability of stroke patients with MEP(+) (p < 0.05). The correlation analysis revealed that FMA motor change score was associated with decreased unaffected MEP amplitude (r = -0.401, p = 0.010) and decreased affected rMT (r = -0.584, p < 0.001) from baseline, which was only observed in the MEP(+) group.

Conclusion: The effects of LF-rTMS on motor recovery and cortical excitability were more effective in stroke patients with MEP than those with no MEP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信