比较两种针对跨专业方法的在线学习活动对健康科学专业学生团队合作态度的影响

IF 3.4 3区医学 Q1 NURSING

Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101638

Derya Uzelli RN, PhD , Esra Akın RN, PhD , Derya Özer Kaya PT, PhD , Gülşah Kaner Tohtak ND, PhD , Bumin Nuri Dündar MD , Duygu Yıldırım RN, PhD , Gamze Çalık ND, MSc , Merve Keskin PT, MSc

{"title":"比较两种针对跨专业方法的在线学习活动对健康科学专业学生团队合作态度的影响","authors":"Derya Uzelli RN, PhD , Esra Akın RN, PhD , Derya Özer Kaya PT, PhD , Gülşah Kaner Tohtak ND, PhD , Bumin Nuri Dündar MD , Duygu Yıldırım RN, PhD , Gamze Çalık ND, MSc , Merve Keskin PT, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical distancing restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic led to the transition from in-person to online learning for many health sciences educators. This study was conducted to compare the effects of two online learning activities addressing interprofessional teamwork on health science students’ attitudes towards teamwork.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was designed as a randomized quasi-experimental study. The nursing (<em>n</em> = 30), physiotherapy and rehabilitation (<em>n</em> = 30), and nutrition-dietetics (<em>n</em> = 30) students were assigned to either online standardized patient simulation (<em>n</em> = 45) or online case analysis (<em>n</em> = 45) groups. Students’ attitudes towards interprofessional teamwork were collected pre- and post-test evaluation using the TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (T-TAQ).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were found between T-TAQ mean scores prior the intervention (<em>p</em> > .05). However, following the intervention, whilst the T-TAQ mean scores were not found to be statistically significant between the two groups (<em>p</em> > .05), the students’ pretest and posttest T-TAQ mean scores did show a statistically significant difference (<em>p</em> < .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found online learning activities to be a successful alternative to physical interprofesional education activities and a worthwhile opportunity to develop health science students to interprofesional teamwork.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 101638"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing two online learning activities addressing interprofessional approach on health science students’ attitudes towards teamwork\",\"authors\":\"Derya Uzelli RN, PhD , Esra Akın RN, PhD , Derya Özer Kaya PT, PhD , Gülşah Kaner Tohtak ND, PhD , Bumin Nuri Dündar MD , Duygu Yıldırım RN, PhD , Gamze Çalık ND, MSc , Merve Keskin PT, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical distancing restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic led to the transition from in-person to online learning for many health sciences educators. This study was conducted to compare the effects of two online learning activities addressing interprofessional teamwork on health science students’ attitudes towards teamwork.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was designed as a randomized quasi-experimental study. The nursing (<em>n</em> = 30), physiotherapy and rehabilitation (<em>n</em> = 30), and nutrition-dietetics (<em>n</em> = 30) students were assigned to either online standardized patient simulation (<em>n</em> = 45) or online case analysis (<em>n</em> = 45) groups. Students’ attitudes towards interprofessional teamwork were collected pre- and post-test evaluation using the TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (T-TAQ).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were found between T-TAQ mean scores prior the intervention (<em>p</em> > .05). However, following the intervention, whilst the T-TAQ mean scores were not found to be statistically significant between the two groups (<em>p</em> > .05), the students’ pretest and posttest T-TAQ mean scores did show a statistically significant difference (<em>p</em> < .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found online learning activities to be a successful alternative to physical interprofesional education activities and a worthwhile opportunity to develop health science students to interprofesional teamwork.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924001300\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924001300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景COVID-19大流行期间的物理距离限制导致许多健康科学教育工作者从面对面学习过渡到在线学习。本研究旨在比较两种针对跨专业团队合作的在线学习活动对健康科学专业学生团队合作态度的影响。护理学（n = 30）、物理治疗和康复（n = 30）以及营养饮食学（n = 30）的学生被分配到在线标准化病人模拟（n = 45）或在线案例分析（n = 45）组。使用TeamSTEPPS团队合作态度问卷（T-TAQ）收集学生在测试前后对跨专业团队合作的态度。结果在干预前，T-TAQ平均分之间没有发现显著差异（p > .05）。然而，在干预之后，虽然发现两组之间的 T-TAQ 平均分没有统计学意义（p >.05），但学生在测试前和测试后的 T-TAQ 平均分确实显示出统计学意义上的显著差异（p <.05）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparing two online learning activities addressing interprofessional approach on health science students’ attitudes towards teamwork

Background

Physical distancing restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic led to the transition from in-person to online learning for many health sciences educators. This study was conducted to compare the effects of two online learning activities addressing interprofessional teamwork on health science students’ attitudes towards teamwork.

Methods

This study was designed as a randomized quasi-experimental study. The nursing (n = 30), physiotherapy and rehabilitation (n = 30), and nutrition-dietetics (n = 30) students were assigned to either online standardized patient simulation (n = 45) or online case analysis (n = 45) groups. Students’ attitudes towards interprofessional teamwork were collected pre- and post-test evaluation using the TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (T-TAQ).

Results

No significant differences were found between T-TAQ mean scores prior the intervention (p > .05). However, following the intervention, whilst the T-TAQ mean scores were not found to be statistically significant between the two groups (p > .05), the students’ pretest and posttest T-TAQ mean scores did show a statistically significant difference (p < .05).

Conclusion

We found online learning activities to be a successful alternative to physical interprofesional education activities and a worthwhile opportunity to develop health science students to interprofesional teamwork.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Simulation in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

15.40%

发文量

107

期刊介绍： Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.