在正面和远侧撞击中,头枕(HR)干扰对儿童约束系统(CRS)性能的影响。

Q2 Medicine
Julie A Mansfield
{"title":"在正面和远侧撞击中,头枕(HR)干扰对儿童约束系统(CRS)性能的影响。","authors":"Julie A Mansfield","doi":"10.4271/2024-22-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forward-facing child restraint systems (FF CRS) and high-back boosters often contact the vehicle seat head restraint (HR) when installed, creating a gap between the back surface of the CRS and the vehicle seat. The effects of HR interference on dynamic CRS performance are not well documented. The objective of this study is to quantify the effects of HR interference for FF CRS and high-back boosters in frontal and far-side impacts. Production vehicle seats with prominent, removeable HRs were attached to a sled buck. One FF CRS and two booster models were tested with the HR in place (causing interference) and with the HR removed (no interference). A variety of installation methods were examined for the FF CRS. A total of twenty-four tests were run. In frontal impacts, HR interference produced small but consistent increases in frontal head excursion and HIC36. Head excursions were more directly related to the more forward initial position rather than kinematic differences caused by HR interference. In far-side impacts, HR interference did not have consistent effects on injury metrics. Overall, these results suggest only slight benefits of removing the HR in frontal impacts specifically. Caregivers should use caution if removing a vehicle HR to ensure that the current child occupant and all future vehicle occupants have adequate head support available in case of a rear impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"68 ","pages":"31-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of head restraint (HR) interference on child restraint system (CRS) performance in frontal and far-side impacts.\",\"authors\":\"Julie A Mansfield\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/2024-22-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Forward-facing child restraint systems (FF CRS) and high-back boosters often contact the vehicle seat head restraint (HR) when installed, creating a gap between the back surface of the CRS and the vehicle seat. The effects of HR interference on dynamic CRS performance are not well documented. The objective of this study is to quantify the effects of HR interference for FF CRS and high-back boosters in frontal and far-side impacts. Production vehicle seats with prominent, removeable HRs were attached to a sled buck. One FF CRS and two booster models were tested with the HR in place (causing interference) and with the HR removed (no interference). A variety of installation methods were examined for the FF CRS. A total of twenty-four tests were run. In frontal impacts, HR interference produced small but consistent increases in frontal head excursion and HIC36. Head excursions were more directly related to the more forward initial position rather than kinematic differences caused by HR interference. In far-side impacts, HR interference did not have consistent effects on injury metrics. Overall, these results suggest only slight benefits of removing the HR in frontal impacts specifically. Caregivers should use caution if removing a vehicle HR to ensure that the current child occupant and all future vehicle occupants have adequate head support available in case of a rear impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stapp car crash journal\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"31-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stapp car crash journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-22-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-22-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前向式儿童约束系统(FF CRS)和高靠背助推器在安装时经常会接触到汽车座椅头枕(HR),从而在 CRS 的后表面和汽车座椅之间产生间隙。HR干扰对动态CRS性能的影响还没有很好的记录。本研究的目的是量化在正面和远侧撞击中FF CRS和高靠背助推器的HR干扰效果。带有突出的可拆卸HR的量产汽车座椅被安装在雪橇降压装置上。在安装 HR(造成干扰)和拆除 HR(无干扰)的情况下,对一种 FF CRS 和两种助推器型号进行了测试。对 FF CRS 的各种安装方法进行了测试。总共进行了 24 次测试。在正面撞击中,HR 干扰会导致正面头部偏移和 HIC36 增加,虽然幅度不大,但效果一致。头部偏移与更靠前的初始位置有更直接的关系,而不是由 HR 干扰造成的运动学差异。在远侧撞击中,心率干扰对伤害指标的影响并不一致。总之,这些结果表明,在正面撞击中去除 HR 只会带来轻微的益处。护理人员在移除车辆人力资源时应谨慎行事,以确保当前儿童乘员和所有未来的车辆乘员在发生后部撞击时有足够的头部支撑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of head restraint (HR) interference on child restraint system (CRS) performance in frontal and far-side impacts.

Forward-facing child restraint systems (FF CRS) and high-back boosters often contact the vehicle seat head restraint (HR) when installed, creating a gap between the back surface of the CRS and the vehicle seat. The effects of HR interference on dynamic CRS performance are not well documented. The objective of this study is to quantify the effects of HR interference for FF CRS and high-back boosters in frontal and far-side impacts. Production vehicle seats with prominent, removeable HRs were attached to a sled buck. One FF CRS and two booster models were tested with the HR in place (causing interference) and with the HR removed (no interference). A variety of installation methods were examined for the FF CRS. A total of twenty-four tests were run. In frontal impacts, HR interference produced small but consistent increases in frontal head excursion and HIC36. Head excursions were more directly related to the more forward initial position rather than kinematic differences caused by HR interference. In far-side impacts, HR interference did not have consistent effects on injury metrics. Overall, these results suggest only slight benefits of removing the HR in frontal impacts specifically. Caregivers should use caution if removing a vehicle HR to ensure that the current child occupant and all future vehicle occupants have adequate head support available in case of a rear impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stapp car crash journal
Stapp car crash journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信