[操作者的经验对使用新型镍钛器械进行根管治疗的质量和成功率的影响]。

Q4 Medicine
T F Shao, R Zhang, R Guan, C Zhang, B X Hou
{"title":"[操作者的经验对使用新型镍钛器械进行根管治疗的质量和成功率的影响]。","authors":"T F Shao, R Zhang, R Guan, C Zhang, B X Hou","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240516-00206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To analyze the influence of operator's experience on the quality and success rate of root canal treatment with new nickel-titanium instruments, providing support for improving the success rate of root canal treatment with new nickel-titanium instruments in clinic. <b>Methods:</b> Cases of root canal treatment and non-surgical root canal retreatment with 6-12 months recall performed by residents (resident group) with experience of 1-3 years and endodontic specialists (specialist group) with experience of 5-7 years were collected from the electronic medical system of the Department of Endodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, from September 2020 to August 2021. All cases were prepared by engine-driven glide path files and controlled memory nickel-titanium finishing files. Chi-square test and logistic regression were used to analyze the differences and influencing factors of complications, filling quality and success rate of root canal treatment between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> A total of 277 cases performed by 24 residents and 3 specialists were included, 169 in the resident group and 108 in the specialist group. The clinical incidence of flare-ups was significantly higher in the resident group [3.6% (6/169)] than in the specialist group [0(0/108)] (<i>P=</i>0.048). There were no significant differences in ledges, root canal transportations, perforations, or instrument separations between the two groups (<i>P></i>0.05). The prevalence of satisfactory fillings was 62.7% (106/169) in the resident group, which was significantly lower than that in the specialist group [86.1% (93/108)] (<i>P<</i>0.05). The success rate of root canal treatment was 91.7% (155/169) and 94.4% (102/108) in the resident group and the specialist group, respectively, with no significant differences (χ<sup>2</sup>=0.73,<i>P=</i>0.392). Multivariate analysis showed that the success rate of root canal treatment was related to complications and quality of root fillings (<i>P<</i>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Higher success rate of root canal treatment could be achieved by residents and endodontic specialists with engine-driven glide path files and controlled memory nickel-titanium files.</p>","PeriodicalId":23965,"journal":{"name":"中华口腔医学杂志","volume":"59 11","pages":"1126-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Influence of operator's experience on the quality and success rate of root canal treatment with new nickel-titanium instruments].\",\"authors\":\"T F Shao, R Zhang, R Guan, C Zhang, B X Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240516-00206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To analyze the influence of operator's experience on the quality and success rate of root canal treatment with new nickel-titanium instruments, providing support for improving the success rate of root canal treatment with new nickel-titanium instruments in clinic. <b>Methods:</b> Cases of root canal treatment and non-surgical root canal retreatment with 6-12 months recall performed by residents (resident group) with experience of 1-3 years and endodontic specialists (specialist group) with experience of 5-7 years were collected from the electronic medical system of the Department of Endodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, from September 2020 to August 2021. All cases were prepared by engine-driven glide path files and controlled memory nickel-titanium finishing files. Chi-square test and logistic regression were used to analyze the differences and influencing factors of complications, filling quality and success rate of root canal treatment between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> A total of 277 cases performed by 24 residents and 3 specialists were included, 169 in the resident group and 108 in the specialist group. The clinical incidence of flare-ups was significantly higher in the resident group [3.6% (6/169)] than in the specialist group [0(0/108)] (<i>P=</i>0.048). There were no significant differences in ledges, root canal transportations, perforations, or instrument separations between the two groups (<i>P></i>0.05). The prevalence of satisfactory fillings was 62.7% (106/169) in the resident group, which was significantly lower than that in the specialist group [86.1% (93/108)] (<i>P<</i>0.05). The success rate of root canal treatment was 91.7% (155/169) and 94.4% (102/108) in the resident group and the specialist group, respectively, with no significant differences (χ<sup>2</sup>=0.73,<i>P=</i>0.392). Multivariate analysis showed that the success rate of root canal treatment was related to complications and quality of root fillings (<i>P<</i>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Higher success rate of root canal treatment could be achieved by residents and endodontic specialists with engine-driven glide path files and controlled memory nickel-titanium files.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华口腔医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"59 11\",\"pages\":\"1126-1131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华口腔医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240516-00206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240516-00206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析操作者经验对使用新型镍钛器械进行根管治疗的质量和成功率的影响,为提高临床使用新型镍钛器械进行根管治疗的成功率提供支持。方法:从首都医科大学口腔医学院牙体牙髓科电子医疗系统中收集 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 8 月期间由具有 1-3 年工作经验的住院医师(住院医师组)和具有 5-7 年工作经验的牙体牙髓专科医师(专科医师组)实施的根管治疗和 6-12 个月召回的非手术根管再治疗病例。所有病例均使用发动机驱动的滑行牙弓和可控记忆镍钛精加工牙弓进行预备。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归分析两组根管治疗并发症、充填质量和成功率的差异及影响因素。结果24名住院医师和3名专科医生共完成了277例根管治疗,其中住院医师组169例,专科医生组108例。住院医师组的耀斑临床发生率[3.6%(6/169)]明显高于专科医生组[0(0/108)](P=0.048)。两组之间在根尖、根管运输、穿孔或器械分离方面没有明显差异(P>0.05)。住院医师组的满意充填率为 62.7%(106/169),明显低于专科医师组[86.1%(93/108)](P0.05)。住院医师组和专科医生组的根管治疗成功率分别为 91.7%(155/169)和 94.4%(102/108),差异无显著性(χ2=0.73,P=0.392)。多变量分析显示,根管治疗的成功率与并发症和根充质量有关(P0.05)。结论住院医师和牙髓专科医生使用发动机驱动的滑行路径根管针和可控记忆镍钛根管针可以获得更高的根管治疗成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Influence of operator's experience on the quality and success rate of root canal treatment with new nickel-titanium instruments].

Objective: To analyze the influence of operator's experience on the quality and success rate of root canal treatment with new nickel-titanium instruments, providing support for improving the success rate of root canal treatment with new nickel-titanium instruments in clinic. Methods: Cases of root canal treatment and non-surgical root canal retreatment with 6-12 months recall performed by residents (resident group) with experience of 1-3 years and endodontic specialists (specialist group) with experience of 5-7 years were collected from the electronic medical system of the Department of Endodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, from September 2020 to August 2021. All cases were prepared by engine-driven glide path files and controlled memory nickel-titanium finishing files. Chi-square test and logistic regression were used to analyze the differences and influencing factors of complications, filling quality and success rate of root canal treatment between the two groups. Results: A total of 277 cases performed by 24 residents and 3 specialists were included, 169 in the resident group and 108 in the specialist group. The clinical incidence of flare-ups was significantly higher in the resident group [3.6% (6/169)] than in the specialist group [0(0/108)] (P=0.048). There were no significant differences in ledges, root canal transportations, perforations, or instrument separations between the two groups (P>0.05). The prevalence of satisfactory fillings was 62.7% (106/169) in the resident group, which was significantly lower than that in the specialist group [86.1% (93/108)] (P<0.05). The success rate of root canal treatment was 91.7% (155/169) and 94.4% (102/108) in the resident group and the specialist group, respectively, with no significant differences (χ2=0.73,P=0.392). Multivariate analysis showed that the success rate of root canal treatment was related to complications and quality of root fillings (P<0.05). Conclusions: Higher success rate of root canal treatment could be achieved by residents and endodontic specialists with engine-driven glide path files and controlled memory nickel-titanium files.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华口腔医学杂志
中华口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9692
期刊介绍: Founded in August 1953, Chinese Journal of Stomatology is a monthly academic journal of stomatology published publicly at home and abroad, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and co-sponsored by the Chinese Stomatology Association. It mainly reports the leading scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the field of oral medicine, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding role in oral clinical practice and is closely combined with oral clinical practice. Chinese Journal of Over the years, Stomatology has been published in Medline, Scopus database, Toxicology Abstracts Database, Chemical Abstracts Database, American Cancer database, Russian Abstracts database, China Core Journal of Science and Technology, Peking University Core Journal, CSCD and other more than 20 important journals at home and abroad Physical medicine database and retrieval system included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信