足跟上升测试在评估外周动脉疾病患者功能能力中的准确性

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anna Karolina M L Oliveira, Victor R Neves, Patrícia F Trevizan, Rafael D B Oliveira, Danielle Aparecida Gomes Pereira
{"title":"足跟上升测试在评估外周动脉疾病患者功能能力中的准确性","authors":"Anna Karolina M L Oliveira, Victor R Neves, Patrícia F Trevizan, Rafael D B Oliveira, Danielle Aparecida Gomes Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of heel rise test (HRT) for assessing the functional capacity (FC) of individuals with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and determine the best sensitivity cutoff point to stratify individuals with worse FC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective methodological study included adults of both sexes diagnosed with PAD and intermittent claudication. Individuals performed the HRT (number of plantar flexions, execution time, and execution rate were recorded) and the incremental shuttle walking test (distance walked was recorded). The accuracy analysis and the determination of the sensitivity of the HRT in assessing FC were performed by the receiver operating characteristic curve based on the following incremental shuttle walking test cutoff point: 380 meters. Alpha was set at 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 120 individuals were included (64 ± 9.65 years). The number of plantar flexions showed better accuracy for FC assessment (area under the curve, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90). The best sensitivity cutoff to stratify the individuals with the worst FC was 63 plantar flexions (sensitivity, 0.952; specificity, 0.562).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HRT showed good accuracy, adequate sensitivity, and acceptable specificity in assessing the FC of individuals with PAD. The best sensitivity cutoff point to stratify individuals with worse FC was 63 plantar flexions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heel Rise Test Accuracy in the Assessment of the Functional Capacity of Individuals With Peripheral Arterial Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Karolina M L Oliveira, Victor R Neves, Patrícia F Trevizan, Rafael D B Oliveira, Danielle Aparecida Gomes Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of heel rise test (HRT) for assessing the functional capacity (FC) of individuals with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and determine the best sensitivity cutoff point to stratify individuals with worse FC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective methodological study included adults of both sexes diagnosed with PAD and intermittent claudication. Individuals performed the HRT (number of plantar flexions, execution time, and execution rate were recorded) and the incremental shuttle walking test (distance walked was recorded). The accuracy analysis and the determination of the sensitivity of the HRT in assessing FC were performed by the receiver operating characteristic curve based on the following incremental shuttle walking test cutoff point: 380 meters. Alpha was set at 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 120 individuals were included (64 ± 9.65 years). The number of plantar flexions showed better accuracy for FC assessment (area under the curve, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90). The best sensitivity cutoff to stratify the individuals with the worst FC was 63 plantar flexions (sensitivity, 0.952; specificity, 0.562).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HRT showed good accuracy, adequate sensitivity, and acceptable specificity in assessing the FC of individuals with PAD. The best sensitivity cutoff point to stratify individuals with worse FC was 63 plantar flexions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估足跟站立试验(HRT)在评估外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者功能能力(FC)方面的准确性,并确定最佳灵敏度临界点,以对功能能力较差的患者进行分层:这项回顾性方法学研究包括被诊断患有 PAD 和间歇性跛行的成年男女。受试者进行了HRT(记录跖屈次数、执行时间和执行率)和增量穿梭步行测试(记录步行距离)。根据以下增量穿梭步行测试临界点:380 米,通过接收器操作特征曲线对 HRT 评估 FC 的准确性和灵敏度进行了分析。α设定为5%:本研究共纳入 120 人(64 ± 9.65 岁)。跖屈次数对 FC 评估的准确性更高(曲线下面积,0.78;95% CI,0.65-0.90)。对 FC 最差者进行分层的最佳灵敏度临界值为 63 个跖屈(灵敏度为 0.952;特异度为 0.562):结论:HRT 在评估 PAD 患者的 FC 方面具有良好的准确性、足够的灵敏度和可接受的特异性。对 FC 较差的患者进行分层的最佳灵敏度临界点是跖屈63次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heel Rise Test Accuracy in the Assessment of the Functional Capacity of Individuals With Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of heel rise test (HRT) for assessing the functional capacity (FC) of individuals with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and determine the best sensitivity cutoff point to stratify individuals with worse FC.

Methods: This retrospective methodological study included adults of both sexes diagnosed with PAD and intermittent claudication. Individuals performed the HRT (number of plantar flexions, execution time, and execution rate were recorded) and the incremental shuttle walking test (distance walked was recorded). The accuracy analysis and the determination of the sensitivity of the HRT in assessing FC were performed by the receiver operating characteristic curve based on the following incremental shuttle walking test cutoff point: 380 meters. Alpha was set at 5%.

Results: In this study, 120 individuals were included (64 ± 9.65 years). The number of plantar flexions showed better accuracy for FC assessment (area under the curve, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90). The best sensitivity cutoff to stratify the individuals with the worst FC was 63 plantar flexions (sensitivity, 0.952; specificity, 0.562).

Conclusion: The HRT showed good accuracy, adequate sensitivity, and acceptable specificity in assessing the FC of individuals with PAD. The best sensitivity cutoff point to stratify individuals with worse FC was 63 plantar flexions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信