牙槽骨重建与晚期种植体周围炎缺陷导致的种植体拔除同步进行:概念验证。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Alberto Monje, Maria Costanza Soldini, Paul S Rosen, Dennis Tarnow, Jose Nart, Ramón Pons
{"title":"牙槽骨重建与晚期种植体周围炎缺陷导致的种植体拔除同步进行:概念验证。","authors":"Alberto Monje, Maria Costanza Soldini, Paul S Rosen, Dennis Tarnow, Jose Nart, Ramón Pons","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of alveolar bone reconstruction simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Partial or fully dentulous patients subjected to implant removal due to advanced peri-implantitis (≥ 50% of bone loss) lesions and seeking to have the failed implant replaced for esthetic or functional reasons were consecutively included. Guided bone regeneration was performed by means of a mixture of xenograft and autogenous bone and a ribose cross-linked barrier membrane. Re-entry for implant placement was performed at 4-month follow-up. Overall, six radiographic variables were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) alveolar bone reconstruction at four levels in ridge width (RW) and height (RH). Peri-implant conditions were evaluated at latest follow-up. Simple and multiple binary logistic regression models were calculated using generalized estimation equations to evaluate the effect of baseline upon reconstructive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20 patients (n<sub>implant</sub> = 39) met the inclusion criteria. Alveolar RW and RH were augmented from T0 to T1 at all levels. All implants achieved primary stability. Only ~13% were subjected to ancillary bone regeneration simultaneous to implant placement. After a mean follow-up period after loading of ~2.2 years, ~70% implants demonstrated peri-implant health, while mucositis was diagnosed in the remaining implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performance of alveolar bone reconstruction in residual partially contained defects simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis lesions demonstrates being safe and effective for implant site development.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alveolar Bone Reconstruction Simultaneous to Implant Removal due to Advanced Peri-Implantitis Defects: A Proof of Concept.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Monje, Maria Costanza Soldini, Paul S Rosen, Dennis Tarnow, Jose Nart, Ramón Pons\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of alveolar bone reconstruction simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Partial or fully dentulous patients subjected to implant removal due to advanced peri-implantitis (≥ 50% of bone loss) lesions and seeking to have the failed implant replaced for esthetic or functional reasons were consecutively included. Guided bone regeneration was performed by means of a mixture of xenograft and autogenous bone and a ribose cross-linked barrier membrane. Re-entry for implant placement was performed at 4-month follow-up. Overall, six radiographic variables were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) alveolar bone reconstruction at four levels in ridge width (RW) and height (RH). Peri-implant conditions were evaluated at latest follow-up. Simple and multiple binary logistic regression models were calculated using generalized estimation equations to evaluate the effect of baseline upon reconstructive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20 patients (n<sub>implant</sub> = 39) met the inclusion criteria. Alveolar RW and RH were augmented from T0 to T1 at all levels. All implants achieved primary stability. Only ~13% were subjected to ancillary bone regeneration simultaneous to implant placement. After a mean follow-up period after loading of ~2.2 years, ~70% implants demonstrated peri-implant health, while mucositis was diagnosed in the remaining implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performance of alveolar bone reconstruction in residual partially contained defects simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis lesions demonstrates being safe and effective for implant site development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13352\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估因种植体周围炎而拔除种植体的同时进行牙槽骨重建的安全性和有效性:评估在因种植体周围炎拔除种植体的同时进行牙槽骨重建的安全性和有效性:连续纳入因晚期种植体周围炎(骨质流失≥50%)病变而被拔除种植体的部分或全口无牙患者,他们因美观或功能原因而寻求更换失败的种植体。通过异种骨和自体骨的混合物以及核糖交联屏障膜进行引导性骨再生。在 4 个月的随访中重新进行了种植体植入。总体而言,在牙槽骨重建前(T0)和重建后(T1),对四个层面的牙嵴宽度(RW)和高度(RH)进行了六项放射学变量评估。最近一次随访时对种植体周围情况进行了评估。使用广义估计方程计算简单和多重二元逻辑回归模型,以评估基线对重建结果的影响:共有 20 名患者(nimplant = 39)符合纳入标准。从T0到T1,所有水平的牙槽骨RW和RH都进行了增量。所有种植体都达到了基本稳定。只有约 13% 的患者在植入种植体的同时进行了辅助骨再生。经过约 2.2 年的平均随访,约 70% 的种植体显示出种植体周围的健康状况,而其余的种植体被诊断为粘膜炎:结论:在因种植体周围炎病变而拔除种植体的同时,对残留的部分缺损进行牙槽骨重建,对种植体部位的发展是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alveolar Bone Reconstruction Simultaneous to Implant Removal due to Advanced Peri-Implantitis Defects: A Proof of Concept.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of alveolar bone reconstruction simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis.

Material and methods: Partial or fully dentulous patients subjected to implant removal due to advanced peri-implantitis (≥ 50% of bone loss) lesions and seeking to have the failed implant replaced for esthetic or functional reasons were consecutively included. Guided bone regeneration was performed by means of a mixture of xenograft and autogenous bone and a ribose cross-linked barrier membrane. Re-entry for implant placement was performed at 4-month follow-up. Overall, six radiographic variables were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) alveolar bone reconstruction at four levels in ridge width (RW) and height (RH). Peri-implant conditions were evaluated at latest follow-up. Simple and multiple binary logistic regression models were calculated using generalized estimation equations to evaluate the effect of baseline upon reconstructive outcomes.

Results: In total, 20 patients (nimplant = 39) met the inclusion criteria. Alveolar RW and RH were augmented from T0 to T1 at all levels. All implants achieved primary stability. Only ~13% were subjected to ancillary bone regeneration simultaneous to implant placement. After a mean follow-up period after loading of ~2.2 years, ~70% implants demonstrated peri-implant health, while mucositis was diagnosed in the remaining implants.

Conclusion: The performance of alveolar bone reconstruction in residual partially contained defects simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis lesions demonstrates being safe and effective for implant site development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信