评估维生素 D 缺乏对心血管健康的相对重要性。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1435738
Maira Rubab, John D Kelleher
{"title":"评估维生素 D 缺乏对心血管健康的相对重要性。","authors":"Maira Rubab, John D Kelleher","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1435738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has suggested a potential link between vitamin D (VD) deficiency and adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, although the findings have been inconsistent. This study investigates the association between VD deficiency and cardiovascular disease (CVD) within the context of established CVD risk factors. We utilized a Random Forest model to predict both CVD and VD deficiency risks, using a dataset of 1,078 observations from a rural Chinese population. Feature importance was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to discern the impact of various risk factors on the model's output. The results showed that the model for CVD prediction achieved a high accuracy of 87%, demonstrating robust performance across precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. Conversely, the VD deficiency prediction model exhibited suboptimal performance, with an accuracy of 52% and lower precision, recall, and F1 scores. Feature importance analysis indicated that traditional risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, age, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio significantly influenced CVD risk, collectively contributing to 70% of the model's predictive power. Although VD deficiency was associated with an increased risk of CVD, its importance in predicting CVD risk was notably low. Similarly, for VD deficiency prediction, CVD risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, glucose levels, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index emerged as influential features. However, the overall predictive performance of the VD deficiency prediction model was weak (52%), indicating the absence of VD deficiency-related risk factors. Ablation experiments confirmed the relatively lower importance of VD deficiency in predicting CVD risk. Furthermore, the SHAP partial dependence plot revealed a nonlinear relationship between VD levels and CVD risk. In conclusion, while VD deficiency appears directly or indirectly associated with increased CVD risk, its relative importance within predictive models is considerably lower when compared to other risk factors. These findings suggest that VD deficiency may not warrant primary focus in CVD risk assessment and prevention strategies, however, further research is needed to explore the causal relationship between VD deficiency and CVD risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1435738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the relative importance of vitamin D deficiency in cardiovascular health.\",\"authors\":\"Maira Rubab, John D Kelleher\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1435738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous research has suggested a potential link between vitamin D (VD) deficiency and adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, although the findings have been inconsistent. This study investigates the association between VD deficiency and cardiovascular disease (CVD) within the context of established CVD risk factors. We utilized a Random Forest model to predict both CVD and VD deficiency risks, using a dataset of 1,078 observations from a rural Chinese population. Feature importance was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to discern the impact of various risk factors on the model's output. The results showed that the model for CVD prediction achieved a high accuracy of 87%, demonstrating robust performance across precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. Conversely, the VD deficiency prediction model exhibited suboptimal performance, with an accuracy of 52% and lower precision, recall, and F1 scores. Feature importance analysis indicated that traditional risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, age, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio significantly influenced CVD risk, collectively contributing to 70% of the model's predictive power. Although VD deficiency was associated with an increased risk of CVD, its importance in predicting CVD risk was notably low. Similarly, for VD deficiency prediction, CVD risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, glucose levels, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index emerged as influential features. However, the overall predictive performance of the VD deficiency prediction model was weak (52%), indicating the absence of VD deficiency-related risk factors. Ablation experiments confirmed the relatively lower importance of VD deficiency in predicting CVD risk. Furthermore, the SHAP partial dependence plot revealed a nonlinear relationship between VD levels and CVD risk. In conclusion, while VD deficiency appears directly or indirectly associated with increased CVD risk, its relative importance within predictive models is considerably lower when compared to other risk factors. These findings suggest that VD deficiency may not warrant primary focus in CVD risk assessment and prevention strategies, however, further research is needed to explore the causal relationship between VD deficiency and CVD risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1435738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521893/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1435738\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1435738","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究表明,维生素 D(VD)缺乏与不良心血管健康后果之间存在潜在联系,但研究结果并不一致。本研究结合已确定的心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素,调查了维生素 D 缺乏与心血管疾病(CVD)之间的关联。我们使用随机森林模型预测心血管疾病和 VD 缺乏的风险,数据集包含来自中国农村人口的 1,078 个观测值。使用SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)评估了特征的重要性,以辨别各种风险因素对模型输出结果的影响。结果表明,心血管疾病预测模型的准确率高达 87%,在精确度、召回率和 F1 分数指标上都表现出稳健的性能。相反,VD 缺乏症预测模型表现不佳,准确率为 52%,精确度、召回率和 F1 分数都较低。特征重要性分析表明,收缩压、舒张压、年龄、体重指数和腰臀比等传统风险因素对心血管疾病风险有显著影响,共占模型预测能力的 70%。尽管VD缺乏与心血管疾病风险的增加有关,但其在预测心血管疾病风险方面的重要性明显较低。同样,对于 VD 缺乏症的预测,收缩压、血糖水平、舒张压和体重指数等心血管疾病风险因素也是有影响的特征。然而,VD 缺乏症预测模型的整体预测性能较弱(52%),表明缺乏 VD 缺乏症相关的风险因素。消融实验证实,VD 缺乏在预测心血管疾病风险方面的重要性相对较低。此外,SHAP 部分依存图显示 VD 水平与心血管疾病风险之间存在非线性关系。总之,尽管VD缺乏似乎与心血管疾病风险的增加直接或间接相关,但与其他风险因素相比,其在预测模型中的相对重要性要低得多。这些研究结果表明,在心血管疾病风险评估和预防策略中,VD 缺乏可能不值得重点关注,但是,还需要进一步研究来探讨 VD 缺乏与心血管疾病风险之间的因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the relative importance of vitamin D deficiency in cardiovascular health.

Previous research has suggested a potential link between vitamin D (VD) deficiency and adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, although the findings have been inconsistent. This study investigates the association between VD deficiency and cardiovascular disease (CVD) within the context of established CVD risk factors. We utilized a Random Forest model to predict both CVD and VD deficiency risks, using a dataset of 1,078 observations from a rural Chinese population. Feature importance was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to discern the impact of various risk factors on the model's output. The results showed that the model for CVD prediction achieved a high accuracy of 87%, demonstrating robust performance across precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. Conversely, the VD deficiency prediction model exhibited suboptimal performance, with an accuracy of 52% and lower precision, recall, and F1 scores. Feature importance analysis indicated that traditional risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, age, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio significantly influenced CVD risk, collectively contributing to 70% of the model's predictive power. Although VD deficiency was associated with an increased risk of CVD, its importance in predicting CVD risk was notably low. Similarly, for VD deficiency prediction, CVD risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, glucose levels, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index emerged as influential features. However, the overall predictive performance of the VD deficiency prediction model was weak (52%), indicating the absence of VD deficiency-related risk factors. Ablation experiments confirmed the relatively lower importance of VD deficiency in predicting CVD risk. Furthermore, the SHAP partial dependence plot revealed a nonlinear relationship between VD levels and CVD risk. In conclusion, while VD deficiency appears directly or indirectly associated with increased CVD risk, its relative importance within predictive models is considerably lower when compared to other risk factors. These findings suggest that VD deficiency may not warrant primary focus in CVD risk assessment and prevention strategies, however, further research is needed to explore the causal relationship between VD deficiency and CVD risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信