第二类颌骨骨折治疗中的争议。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001702
Abhiraj D Bhimani, James S Harrop, Emery Monnig, Yehia Elkersh, John K Houten
{"title":"第二类颌骨骨折治疗中的争议。","authors":"Abhiraj D Bhimani, James S Harrop, Emery Monnig, Yehia Elkersh, John K Houten","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly is controversial, as these patients often have numerous medical comorbidities that increase the risks of surgery, but they may also fail to achieve fracture healing with nonsurgical management. Recent changes in technology and surgeon attitudes may influence the preferred approach to both surgical and nonsurgical treatments for many clinicians. While bony fracture healing remains the goal of management, a stable fibrous union is increasingly considered a satisfactory outcome. The optimal surgical approach remains debated, with some authors raising concerns about the risk of swallowing dysfunction being particularly problematic with odontoid screw placement in the elderly. The use of BMP-2 applied either anteriorly into the fracture site or posteriorly in the interlaminar space and placement of temporary posterior fixation to be removed upon demonstration of anterior bony healing are novel surgical techniques that are presently the subject of investigation. A clearer understanding of the currently available treatment options and the associated controversies may improve clinician decision-making and potentially better patient outcomes in the management of type II odontoid fractures for the growing geriatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":"37 9","pages":"372-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversies in the Management of Type II Odontoid Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Abhiraj D Bhimani, James S Harrop, Emery Monnig, Yehia Elkersh, John K Houten\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The management of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly is controversial, as these patients often have numerous medical comorbidities that increase the risks of surgery, but they may also fail to achieve fracture healing with nonsurgical management. Recent changes in technology and surgeon attitudes may influence the preferred approach to both surgical and nonsurgical treatments for many clinicians. While bony fracture healing remains the goal of management, a stable fibrous union is increasingly considered a satisfactory outcome. The optimal surgical approach remains debated, with some authors raising concerns about the risk of swallowing dysfunction being particularly problematic with odontoid screw placement in the elderly. The use of BMP-2 applied either anteriorly into the fracture site or posteriorly in the interlaminar space and placement of temporary posterior fixation to be removed upon demonstration of anterior bony healing are novel surgical techniques that are presently the subject of investigation. A clearer understanding of the currently available treatment options and the associated controversies may improve clinician decision-making and potentially better patient outcomes in the management of type II odontoid fractures for the growing geriatric population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\"37 9\",\"pages\":\"372-378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001702\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年 II 型蝶骨骨折的治疗颇具争议,因为这些患者通常有许多合并症,增加了手术风险,但他们也可能无法通过非手术治疗实现骨折愈合。最近技术和外科医生态度的变化可能会影响许多临床医生对手术和非手术治疗方法的偏好。虽然骨性骨折愈合仍是治疗的目标,但稳定的纤维结合也越来越被认为是令人满意的结果。最佳的手术方法仍存在争议,一些学者担心吞咽功能障碍的风险,尤其是蝶骨螺钉置入术对老年人造成的问题。目前正在研究的新手术技术包括:在骨折部位前方或椎间孔后方使用 BMP-2,并放置临时后方固定物,待前方骨愈合后再将其移除。更清楚地了解目前可用的治疗方案和相关争议,可以改善临床医生的决策,在治疗日益增多的老年患者的 II 型蝶骨骨折时,可能会为患者带来更好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversies in the Management of Type II Odontoid Fractures.

The management of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly is controversial, as these patients often have numerous medical comorbidities that increase the risks of surgery, but they may also fail to achieve fracture healing with nonsurgical management. Recent changes in technology and surgeon attitudes may influence the preferred approach to both surgical and nonsurgical treatments for many clinicians. While bony fracture healing remains the goal of management, a stable fibrous union is increasingly considered a satisfactory outcome. The optimal surgical approach remains debated, with some authors raising concerns about the risk of swallowing dysfunction being particularly problematic with odontoid screw placement in the elderly. The use of BMP-2 applied either anteriorly into the fracture site or posteriorly in the interlaminar space and placement of temporary posterior fixation to be removed upon demonstration of anterior bony healing are novel surgical techniques that are presently the subject of investigation. A clearer understanding of the currently available treatment options and the associated controversies may improve clinician decision-making and potentially better patient outcomes in the management of type II odontoid fractures for the growing geriatric population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信