Nivolumab 联合 Ipilimumab 对老年晚期肾细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Kosuke Ueda, Naoki Ito, Yuya Sakai, Satoshi Ohnishi, Taishi Hirano, Hirofumi Kurose, Katsuaki Chikui, Keiichiro Uemura, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Makoto Nakiri, Shigetaka Suekane, Tsukasa Igawa
{"title":"Nivolumab 联合 Ipilimumab 对老年晚期肾细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性","authors":"Kosuke Ueda, Naoki Ito, Yuya Sakai, Satoshi Ohnishi, Taishi Hirano, Hirofumi Kurose, Katsuaki Chikui, Keiichiro Uemura, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Makoto Nakiri, Shigetaka Suekane, Tsukasa Igawa","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) is standard therapy for patients with intermediate and poor risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the efficacy and safety of NIVO+IPI in elderly patients aged >75 years remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of first-line NIVO+IPI treatment in patients aged >75 years with advanced RCC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study included 59 patients with advanced RCC who received NIVO+IPI as first-line therapy between September 2018 and December 2023. Objective response rates (ORRs), along with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients aged <75 years and ≥75 years, to assess survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 (78.0%) and 13 (22.0%) patients were classified into <75 years and ≥75 years groups, respectively, at NIVO+IPI initiation. The ORRs were 45.7% for <75 years and 53.8% for ≥75 years (p=0.2422). No significant differences in PFS (p=0.0729) were observed between groups. In contrast, patients aged ≥75 years had better OS than those aged <75 years (p=0.0212). However, no significant difference was observed in the OS between the two groups of patients with clear cell histology (p=0.0532). The incidence of immune-related adverse events higher than Grade 3 was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.5016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NIVO and IPI combination therapy is both safe and efficacious in patients aged ≥75 years with advanced RCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"44 11","pages":"5087-5093"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab With Ipilimumab in Elderly Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Kosuke Ueda, Naoki Ito, Yuya Sakai, Satoshi Ohnishi, Taishi Hirano, Hirofumi Kurose, Katsuaki Chikui, Keiichiro Uemura, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Makoto Nakiri, Shigetaka Suekane, Tsukasa Igawa\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/anticanres.17333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) is standard therapy for patients with intermediate and poor risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the efficacy and safety of NIVO+IPI in elderly patients aged >75 years remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of first-line NIVO+IPI treatment in patients aged >75 years with advanced RCC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study included 59 patients with advanced RCC who received NIVO+IPI as first-line therapy between September 2018 and December 2023. Objective response rates (ORRs), along with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients aged <75 years and ≥75 years, to assess survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 (78.0%) and 13 (22.0%) patients were classified into <75 years and ≥75 years groups, respectively, at NIVO+IPI initiation. The ORRs were 45.7% for <75 years and 53.8% for ≥75 years (p=0.2422). No significant differences in PFS (p=0.0729) were observed between groups. In contrast, patients aged ≥75 years had better OS than those aged <75 years (p=0.0212). However, no significant difference was observed in the OS between the two groups of patients with clear cell histology (p=0.0532). The incidence of immune-related adverse events higher than Grade 3 was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.5016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NIVO and IPI combination therapy is both safe and efficacious in patients aged ≥75 years with advanced RCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anticancer research\",\"volume\":\"44 11\",\"pages\":\"5087-5093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anticancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17333\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:Nivolumab和伊匹单抗(NIVO+IPI)是中危和低危晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的标准疗法。然而,NIVO+IPI在75岁以上老年患者中的疗效和安全性仍不明确。本研究旨在确定NIVO+IPI一线治疗在年龄大于75岁的晚期RCC患者中的疗效和安全性:本研究纳入了2018年9月至2023年12月期间接受NIVO+IPI一线治疗的59例晚期RCC患者。比较了不同年龄患者的客观反应率(ORR)以及无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS):共有 46 例(78.0%)和 13 例(22.0%)患者被归入结论:NIVO和IPI联合疗法对年龄≥75岁的晚期RCC患者既安全又有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab With Ipilimumab in Elderly Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Background/aim: Nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) is standard therapy for patients with intermediate and poor risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the efficacy and safety of NIVO+IPI in elderly patients aged >75 years remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of first-line NIVO+IPI treatment in patients aged >75 years with advanced RCC.

Patients and methods: This study included 59 patients with advanced RCC who received NIVO+IPI as first-line therapy between September 2018 and December 2023. Objective response rates (ORRs), along with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients aged <75 years and ≥75 years, to assess survival outcomes.

Results: A total of 46 (78.0%) and 13 (22.0%) patients were classified into <75 years and ≥75 years groups, respectively, at NIVO+IPI initiation. The ORRs were 45.7% for <75 years and 53.8% for ≥75 years (p=0.2422). No significant differences in PFS (p=0.0729) were observed between groups. In contrast, patients aged ≥75 years had better OS than those aged <75 years (p=0.0212). However, no significant difference was observed in the OS between the two groups of patients with clear cell histology (p=0.0532). The incidence of immune-related adverse events higher than Grade 3 was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.5016).

Conclusion: NIVO and IPI combination therapy is both safe and efficacious in patients aged ≥75 years with advanced RCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信