{"title":"制度压力是中小企业绿色商业模式创新的驱动力吗?区域创新中介机构的中介和调节作用","authors":"Min-Jae Lee , Hyeseung Choi , Taewoo Roh","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While extant research has concentrated on the promotion of regional innovation, it has predominantly adopted a knowledge-based approach. However, there has been a paucity of inquiry into the collective influence of institutional pressure and regional innovation intermediaries (RIIs) on the green business model innovation (GBMI) of small-and-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study aims to identify the mechanisms through which SMEs enhance their GBMI, arguing that RIIs' multifaceted response to institutional pressures can act as both a mediator and a moderator. The empirical results, based on data collected from 176 South Korean SMEs in collaboration with Technoparks, indicate that institutional pressures, specifically regulatory and normative pressures, positively impact GBMI. Although RIIs demonstrate a positive mediating effect on the relationship between institutional pressures and GBMI, the moderating effect of RII yielded a mixed result: positive moderation with regulatory pressure and negative with normative pressure. The findings of our study suggest that RIIs should cultivate a nuanced understanding of the distinctive attributes of each institutional pressure to bolster the GBMI of SMEs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 123814"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is institutional pressure the driver for green business model innovation of SMEs? Mediating and moderating roles of regional innovation intermediaries\",\"authors\":\"Min-Jae Lee , Hyeseung Choi , Taewoo Roh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While extant research has concentrated on the promotion of regional innovation, it has predominantly adopted a knowledge-based approach. However, there has been a paucity of inquiry into the collective influence of institutional pressure and regional innovation intermediaries (RIIs) on the green business model innovation (GBMI) of small-and-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study aims to identify the mechanisms through which SMEs enhance their GBMI, arguing that RIIs' multifaceted response to institutional pressures can act as both a mediator and a moderator. The empirical results, based on data collected from 176 South Korean SMEs in collaboration with Technoparks, indicate that institutional pressures, specifically regulatory and normative pressures, positively impact GBMI. Although RIIs demonstrate a positive mediating effect on the relationship between institutional pressures and GBMI, the moderating effect of RII yielded a mixed result: positive moderation with regulatory pressure and negative with normative pressure. The findings of our study suggest that RIIs should cultivate a nuanced understanding of the distinctive attributes of each institutional pressure to bolster the GBMI of SMEs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524006127\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524006127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is institutional pressure the driver for green business model innovation of SMEs? Mediating and moderating roles of regional innovation intermediaries
While extant research has concentrated on the promotion of regional innovation, it has predominantly adopted a knowledge-based approach. However, there has been a paucity of inquiry into the collective influence of institutional pressure and regional innovation intermediaries (RIIs) on the green business model innovation (GBMI) of small-and-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study aims to identify the mechanisms through which SMEs enhance their GBMI, arguing that RIIs' multifaceted response to institutional pressures can act as both a mediator and a moderator. The empirical results, based on data collected from 176 South Korean SMEs in collaboration with Technoparks, indicate that institutional pressures, specifically regulatory and normative pressures, positively impact GBMI. Although RIIs demonstrate a positive mediating effect on the relationship between institutional pressures and GBMI, the moderating effect of RII yielded a mixed result: positive moderation with regulatory pressure and negative with normative pressure. The findings of our study suggest that RIIs should cultivate a nuanced understanding of the distinctive attributes of each institutional pressure to bolster the GBMI of SMEs.
期刊介绍:
Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors.
In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.