{"title":"祁连山中段东部马仙山组和兴隆山组超基性岩的岩石成因:罗迪尼亚构造的制约因素","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Controversy has long surrounded the reconstruction of the East Asian blocks in the Rodinia supercontinent, which was a coherent large landmass during 900–750 Ma and is now dispersed over all current major continents. The Central Qilian block is a Precambrian microcontinent in the early Paleozoic Qilian orogenic belt, which marks the junction of the North China, South China and Tarim cratons. In this paper, we present a systematic study of the petrology, whole-rock geochemistry, and geochronology of supracrustal rocks from the Maxianshan Group and the Xinglongshan Group in the easternmost part of the block. The metasedimentary rocks from both groups overlie a gneissic granite, which has a zircon U-Pb age of 970 ± 6 Ma with εHf<sub>(t)</sub> values of −3.5 to + 2.5 and is an I-type granite formed in a back-arc setting. Paragneisses from the Maxianshan Group and micaschists from the lower formation of the Xinglongshan Group have detrital zircon U-Pb ages of 2465–876 Ma that peak at <em>ca.</em> 950 Ma. They show strongly decreasing zircon εHf<sub>(t)</sub> values of + 0.8 to −11.3 and ages from 1174 Ma to 876 Ma. Their protoliths constituted a sedimentary sequence with a long history of deposition during 1174–911 Ma in a continental arc-related basin. Metabasaltic tuffs from the middle formation of the Xinglongshan Group are tholeiitic with a zircon U-Pb age of 958 ± 9 Ma and indicate a back-arc setting. Metasandstones from the upper formation of the Xinglongshan Group have detrital zircon ages of 2668–732 Ma that peak at 810 Ma and 984 Ma and indicate a passive margin setting. Combining our results with existing data, we propose that the Maxianshan Group and the Xinglongshan Group make up an early Neoproterozoic trench-arc-basin system at a continental margin of Rodinia. Oceanic crust subduction underneath the continent at 1174–896 Ma with formation of a mature continental arc, and continuous subduction from 824 to 735 Ma with opening of the Proto-Tethys Ocean as a back-arc basin are suggested for the formation of the Central Qilian block.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49674,"journal":{"name":"Precambrian Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Petrogenesis of supracrustal rocks from the Maxianshan and Xinglongshan Groups in the eastern Central Qilian block: Constraints on the construction of Rodinia\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Controversy has long surrounded the reconstruction of the East Asian blocks in the Rodinia supercontinent, which was a coherent large landmass during 900–750 Ma and is now dispersed over all current major continents. The Central Qilian block is a Precambrian microcontinent in the early Paleozoic Qilian orogenic belt, which marks the junction of the North China, South China and Tarim cratons. In this paper, we present a systematic study of the petrology, whole-rock geochemistry, and geochronology of supracrustal rocks from the Maxianshan Group and the Xinglongshan Group in the easternmost part of the block. The metasedimentary rocks from both groups overlie a gneissic granite, which has a zircon U-Pb age of 970 ± 6 Ma with εHf<sub>(t)</sub> values of −3.5 to + 2.5 and is an I-type granite formed in a back-arc setting. Paragneisses from the Maxianshan Group and micaschists from the lower formation of the Xinglongshan Group have detrital zircon U-Pb ages of 2465–876 Ma that peak at <em>ca.</em> 950 Ma. They show strongly decreasing zircon εHf<sub>(t)</sub> values of + 0.8 to −11.3 and ages from 1174 Ma to 876 Ma. Their protoliths constituted a sedimentary sequence with a long history of deposition during 1174–911 Ma in a continental arc-related basin. Metabasaltic tuffs from the middle formation of the Xinglongshan Group are tholeiitic with a zircon U-Pb age of 958 ± 9 Ma and indicate a back-arc setting. Metasandstones from the upper formation of the Xinglongshan Group have detrital zircon ages of 2668–732 Ma that peak at 810 Ma and 984 Ma and indicate a passive margin setting. Combining our results with existing data, we propose that the Maxianshan Group and the Xinglongshan Group make up an early Neoproterozoic trench-arc-basin system at a continental margin of Rodinia. Oceanic crust subduction underneath the continent at 1174–896 Ma with formation of a mature continental arc, and continuous subduction from 824 to 735 Ma with opening of the Proto-Tethys Ocean as a back-arc basin are suggested for the formation of the Central Qilian block.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precambrian Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precambrian Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926824003036\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precambrian Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926824003036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Petrogenesis of supracrustal rocks from the Maxianshan and Xinglongshan Groups in the eastern Central Qilian block: Constraints on the construction of Rodinia
Controversy has long surrounded the reconstruction of the East Asian blocks in the Rodinia supercontinent, which was a coherent large landmass during 900–750 Ma and is now dispersed over all current major continents. The Central Qilian block is a Precambrian microcontinent in the early Paleozoic Qilian orogenic belt, which marks the junction of the North China, South China and Tarim cratons. In this paper, we present a systematic study of the petrology, whole-rock geochemistry, and geochronology of supracrustal rocks from the Maxianshan Group and the Xinglongshan Group in the easternmost part of the block. The metasedimentary rocks from both groups overlie a gneissic granite, which has a zircon U-Pb age of 970 ± 6 Ma with εHf(t) values of −3.5 to + 2.5 and is an I-type granite formed in a back-arc setting. Paragneisses from the Maxianshan Group and micaschists from the lower formation of the Xinglongshan Group have detrital zircon U-Pb ages of 2465–876 Ma that peak at ca. 950 Ma. They show strongly decreasing zircon εHf(t) values of + 0.8 to −11.3 and ages from 1174 Ma to 876 Ma. Their protoliths constituted a sedimentary sequence with a long history of deposition during 1174–911 Ma in a continental arc-related basin. Metabasaltic tuffs from the middle formation of the Xinglongshan Group are tholeiitic with a zircon U-Pb age of 958 ± 9 Ma and indicate a back-arc setting. Metasandstones from the upper formation of the Xinglongshan Group have detrital zircon ages of 2668–732 Ma that peak at 810 Ma and 984 Ma and indicate a passive margin setting. Combining our results with existing data, we propose that the Maxianshan Group and the Xinglongshan Group make up an early Neoproterozoic trench-arc-basin system at a continental margin of Rodinia. Oceanic crust subduction underneath the continent at 1174–896 Ma with formation of a mature continental arc, and continuous subduction from 824 to 735 Ma with opening of the Proto-Tethys Ocean as a back-arc basin are suggested for the formation of the Central Qilian block.
期刊介绍:
Precambrian Research publishes studies on all aspects of the early stages of the composition, structure and evolution of the Earth and its planetary neighbours. With a focus on process-oriented and comparative studies, it covers, but is not restricted to, subjects such as:
(1) Chemical, biological, biochemical and cosmochemical evolution; the origin of life; the evolution of the oceans and atmosphere; the early fossil record; palaeobiology;
(2) Geochronology and isotope and elemental geochemistry;
(3) Precambrian mineral deposits;
(4) Geophysical aspects of the early Earth and Precambrian terrains;
(5) Nature, formation and evolution of the Precambrian lithosphere and mantle including magmatic, depositional, metamorphic and tectonic processes.
In addition, the editors particularly welcome integrated process-oriented studies that involve a combination of the above fields and comparative studies that demonstrate the effect of Precambrian evolution on Phanerozoic earth system processes.
Regional and localised studies of Precambrian phenomena are considered appropriate only when the detail and quality allow illustration of a wider process, or when significant gaps in basic knowledge of a particular area can be filled.