司法机构中的人工智能:批判性观点

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Stephanie Almeida de Jesus Dias , Renato Máximo Sátiro
{"title":"司法机构中的人工智能:批判性观点","authors":"Stephanie Almeida de Jesus Dias ,&nbsp;Renato Máximo Sátiro","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The main objective of this study is to raise questions about using artificial intelligence (AI) in the judiciary based on critical thinking. The essay approach used in this work aims to foster reflection and debate on the subject, presenting a review of theoretical perspectives with particular attention to the critical theory of the first generation of the Frankfurt School and theories that seek to analyze the relationship between humans and society/technology, such as the critical theory of technology, and stays away from the dominant currents of thinking in organizational studies to contribute unexplored perspectives. In this manner, it will go beyond existing benefits and applications, focusing on a critical view that identifies the elements that guide the technological choices that have been made, thus promoting a discussion that aggregates elements for future developments and improvements. Based on this theoretical context, this essay will raise questions and present three propositions summarizing the identified difficulties and directing future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 103493"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: A critical view\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Almeida de Jesus Dias ,&nbsp;Renato Máximo Sátiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The main objective of this study is to raise questions about using artificial intelligence (AI) in the judiciary based on critical thinking. The essay approach used in this work aims to foster reflection and debate on the subject, presenting a review of theoretical perspectives with particular attention to the critical theory of the first generation of the Frankfurt School and theories that seek to analyze the relationship between humans and society/technology, such as the critical theory of technology, and stays away from the dominant currents of thinking in organizational studies to contribute unexplored perspectives. In this manner, it will go beyond existing benefits and applications, focusing on a critical view that identifies the elements that guide the technological choices that have been made, thus promoting a discussion that aggregates elements for future developments and improvements. Based on this theoretical context, this essay will raise questions and present three propositions summarizing the identified difficulties and directing future studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001770\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001770","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是在批判性思维的基础上,提出有关在司法机构中使用人工智能(AI)的问题。本作品采用的论文方法旨在促进对这一主题的思考和辩论,对理论视角进行了回顾,尤其关注了法兰克福学派第一代的批判理论以及技术批判理论等试图分析人类与社会/技术之间关系的理论,并远离了组织研究中的主流思潮,贡献了尚未探索的视角。通过这种方式,本论文将超越现有的效益和应用,专注于一种批判性的观点,确定指导已做出的技术选择的要素,从而促进讨论,为未来的发展和改进汇总要素。基于这一理论背景,本文将提出问题,并提出三个命题,总结已发现的困难,指导今后的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: A critical view
The main objective of this study is to raise questions about using artificial intelligence (AI) in the judiciary based on critical thinking. The essay approach used in this work aims to foster reflection and debate on the subject, presenting a review of theoretical perspectives with particular attention to the critical theory of the first generation of the Frankfurt School and theories that seek to analyze the relationship between humans and society/technology, such as the critical theory of technology, and stays away from the dominant currents of thinking in organizational studies to contribute unexplored perspectives. In this manner, it will go beyond existing benefits and applications, focusing on a critical view that identifies the elements that guide the technological choices that have been made, thus promoting a discussion that aggregates elements for future developments and improvements. Based on this theoretical context, this essay will raise questions and present three propositions summarizing the identified difficulties and directing future studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信