全面的早期扫盲政策和 "密西西比奇迹"

IF 1.8 3区经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS

Economics of Education Review Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102598

Noah Spencer

{"title":"全面的早期扫盲政策和 \"密西西比奇迹\"","authors":"Noah Spencer","doi":"10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2013, Mississippi ranked 49th in fourth grade reading achievement on the National Assessment of Education Progress. By 2019, the state ranked 29th. I study whether Mississippi’s 2013 Literacy-Based Promotion Act (LBPA), a multi-faceted strategy for improving K-3 literacy, played a part in this ascension. Using a synthetic difference-in-differences approach, I estimate that the LBPA meaningfully improved grade 4 reading and math test scores on the national assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48261,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Education Review","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive early literacy policy and the “Mississippi Miracle”\",\"authors\":\"Noah Spencer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In 2013, Mississippi ranked 49th in fourth grade reading achievement on the National Assessment of Education Progress. By 2019, the state ranked 29th. I study whether Mississippi’s 2013 Literacy-Based Promotion Act (LBPA), a multi-faceted strategy for improving K-3 literacy, played a part in this ascension. Using a synthetic difference-in-differences approach, I estimate that the LBPA meaningfully improved grade 4 reading and math test scores on the national assessment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Education Review\",\"volume\":\"103 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027277572400092X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027277572400092X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2013 年，密西西比州在 "全国教育进展评估 "中的四年级阅读成绩排名为第 49 位。到 2019 年，该州排名第 29 位。我研究了密西西比州 2013 年颁布的《基于读写能力的促进法案》（LBPA）--一项旨在提高 K-3 年级读写能力的多层面战略--是否在这一排名上升过程中发挥了作用。通过使用合成差分法，我估计 LBPA 有意义地提高了四年级在全国评估中的阅读和数学考试成绩。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comprehensive early literacy policy and the “Mississippi Miracle”

In 2013, Mississippi ranked 49th in fourth grade reading achievement on the National Assessment of Education Progress. By 2019, the state ranked 29th. I study whether Mississippi’s 2013 Literacy-Based Promotion Act (LBPA), a multi-faceted strategy for improving K-3 literacy, played a part in this ascension. Using a synthetic difference-in-differences approach, I estimate that the LBPA meaningfully improved grade 4 reading and math test scores on the national assessment.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economics of Education Review Multiple-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

4.50%

发文量

审稿时长

61 days

期刊介绍： Economics of Education Review publishes research on education policy and finance, human capital production and acquisition, and the returns to human capital. We accept empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions, but the main focus of Economics of Education Review is on applied studies that employ micro data and clear identification strategies. Our goal is to publish innovative, cutting-edge research on the economics of education that is of interest to academics, policymakers and the public. Starting with papers submitted March 1, 2014, the review process for articles submitted to the Economics of Education Review will no longer be double blind. Authors are requested to include a title page with authors'' names and affiliation. Reviewers will continue to be anonymous.