以实施科学框架为指导,评估临床医生改善青霉素过敏标签公平获取的策略

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
D. Crabtree, O. Asupoto, D. Daudelin, S. Bartels, K. Blumenthal, A. Wurcel, D. Manning, L. Smith
{"title":"以实施科学框架为指导,评估临床医生改善青霉素过敏标签公平获取的策略","authors":"D. Crabtree,&nbsp;O. Asupoto,&nbsp;D. Daudelin,&nbsp;S. Bartels,&nbsp;K. Blumenthal,&nbsp;A. Wurcel,&nbsp;D. Manning,&nbsp;L. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Most people with penicillin allergy labels are not truly allergic. Incorrect penicillin allergy labels lead to unnecessary use of broad-spectrum costly antibiotics, drug-resistance, and morbidity. Primary care clinicians document allergies, but the process of removing allergies (de-labeling) is not routine. Implementation science frameworks provide a systematic approach to identifying and contextualizing barriers and facilitators to penicillin allergy de-labeling.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using an equity-focused adaptation of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), semi-structured interviews were conducted with thirty clinicians from six primary care clinics in the greater Boston area. Robust qualitative methodology guided mixed inductive and deductive coding of interviews that were mapped to themes and CFIR domains.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes emerged: competing priorities, time constraints, fear of negative consequences, and clinical staff role ambiguity. Applying an equity lens, clinicians identified patient factors, including increased number of co-morbid illnesses and speaking languages other than English, creating additional time constraints preventing penicillin allergy de-labeling. These themes mapped most directly to the Inner Setting domain (work infrastructure, human equity-centeredness, and recipient-centeredness) and the Outer Setting domain (external, societal, and market pressures). Strategizes suggested by clinicians included clarifying/expanding the medical assistant role for initiating penicillin allergy de-labeling and leveraging informational technology tools to identify patients for de-labeling.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Implementation science methods can be used to identify barriers and related strategies to improve equitable access to penicillin allergy de-labeling. The next step will leverage partnerships with primary care clinicians and practice administrators to facilitate implementation strategies to increase penicillin allergy de-labeling in primary care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":"133 6","pages":"Page S15"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE FRAMEWORK-GUIDED ASSESSMENT OF CLINICIAN STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE EQUITABLE ACCESS TO PENICILLIN ALLERGY DE-LABELING\",\"authors\":\"D. Crabtree,&nbsp;O. Asupoto,&nbsp;D. Daudelin,&nbsp;S. Bartels,&nbsp;K. Blumenthal,&nbsp;A. Wurcel,&nbsp;D. Manning,&nbsp;L. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Most people with penicillin allergy labels are not truly allergic. Incorrect penicillin allergy labels lead to unnecessary use of broad-spectrum costly antibiotics, drug-resistance, and morbidity. Primary care clinicians document allergies, but the process of removing allergies (de-labeling) is not routine. Implementation science frameworks provide a systematic approach to identifying and contextualizing barriers and facilitators to penicillin allergy de-labeling.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using an equity-focused adaptation of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), semi-structured interviews were conducted with thirty clinicians from six primary care clinics in the greater Boston area. Robust qualitative methodology guided mixed inductive and deductive coding of interviews that were mapped to themes and CFIR domains.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four themes emerged: competing priorities, time constraints, fear of negative consequences, and clinical staff role ambiguity. Applying an equity lens, clinicians identified patient factors, including increased number of co-morbid illnesses and speaking languages other than English, creating additional time constraints preventing penicillin allergy de-labeling. These themes mapped most directly to the Inner Setting domain (work infrastructure, human equity-centeredness, and recipient-centeredness) and the Outer Setting domain (external, societal, and market pressures). Strategizes suggested by clinicians included clarifying/expanding the medical assistant role for initiating penicillin allergy de-labeling and leveraging informational technology tools to identify patients for de-labeling.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Implementation science methods can be used to identify barriers and related strategies to improve equitable access to penicillin allergy de-labeling. The next step will leverage partnerships with primary care clinicians and practice administrators to facilitate implementation strategies to increase penicillin allergy de-labeling in primary care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"volume\":\"133 6\",\"pages\":\"Page S15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120624006173\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120624006173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:大多数对青霉素过敏的人并非真正过敏。不正确的青霉素过敏标签会导致不必要地使用昂贵的广谱抗生素、耐药性和发病率。初级保健临床医生会记录过敏情况,但消除过敏(去标签)的过程并非常规。实施科学框架提供了一种系统的方法,可用于识别青霉素过敏去标签化的障碍和促进因素,并将其背景化。方法采用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的公平性改编版,对来自大波士顿地区六家初级保健诊所的 30 名临床医生进行了半结构化访谈。结果出现了四个主题:相互竞争的优先事项、时间限制、对负面后果的恐惧以及临床人员角色的模糊性。应用公平视角,临床医生发现了患者因素,包括合并疾病数量增加和使用英语以外的语言,这些因素造成了额外的时间限制,阻碍了青霉素过敏标签的去除。这些主题与内部环境领域(工作基础设施、以人的公平为中心和以受援者为中心)和外部环境领域(外部、社会和市场压力)有着最直接的映射关系。临床医生提出的策略包括明确/扩大医疗助理在启动青霉素过敏去标记化中的作用,以及利用信息技术工具识别需要去标记化的患者。下一步将利用与初级保健临床医生和实践管理者的合作关系来促进实施策略,以增加初级保健中的青霉素过敏去标记化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE FRAMEWORK-GUIDED ASSESSMENT OF CLINICIAN STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE EQUITABLE ACCESS TO PENICILLIN ALLERGY DE-LABELING

Introduction

Most people with penicillin allergy labels are not truly allergic. Incorrect penicillin allergy labels lead to unnecessary use of broad-spectrum costly antibiotics, drug-resistance, and morbidity. Primary care clinicians document allergies, but the process of removing allergies (de-labeling) is not routine. Implementation science frameworks provide a systematic approach to identifying and contextualizing barriers and facilitators to penicillin allergy de-labeling.

Methods

Using an equity-focused adaptation of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), semi-structured interviews were conducted with thirty clinicians from six primary care clinics in the greater Boston area. Robust qualitative methodology guided mixed inductive and deductive coding of interviews that were mapped to themes and CFIR domains.

Results

Four themes emerged: competing priorities, time constraints, fear of negative consequences, and clinical staff role ambiguity. Applying an equity lens, clinicians identified patient factors, including increased number of co-morbid illnesses and speaking languages other than English, creating additional time constraints preventing penicillin allergy de-labeling. These themes mapped most directly to the Inner Setting domain (work infrastructure, human equity-centeredness, and recipient-centeredness) and the Outer Setting domain (external, societal, and market pressures). Strategizes suggested by clinicians included clarifying/expanding the medical assistant role for initiating penicillin allergy de-labeling and leveraging informational technology tools to identify patients for de-labeling.

Conclusion

Implementation science methods can be used to identify barriers and related strategies to improve equitable access to penicillin allergy de-labeling. The next step will leverage partnerships with primary care clinicians and practice administrators to facilitate implementation strategies to increase penicillin allergy de-labeling in primary care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信