利用纳滤膜去除污水中的药物化合物

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah , Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar , Rosiah Rohani , Muhammad Faiz Fadzizi , Wan Abd Al-Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar , Khalid Sayed , Teh Sabariah Binti Abdul Manan , Antonius Indarto
{"title":"利用纳滤膜去除污水中的药物化合物","authors":"Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah ,&nbsp;Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar ,&nbsp;Rosiah Rohani ,&nbsp;Muhammad Faiz Fadzizi ,&nbsp;Wan Abd Al-Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar ,&nbsp;Khalid Sayed ,&nbsp;Teh Sabariah Binti Abdul Manan ,&nbsp;Antonius Indarto","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Membrane is a promising technology for water treatment, and its commercial production has emerged globally. However, commercial membranes' effectiveness is still uncertain due to the new types of contaminants, such as pharmaceutical compounds (PC). Thus, in the current work, the performance of two commercial membranes (NFX and GC) has been evaluated using feed water from the effluent of sewage treatment plants (STP) and hospital wastewater (HWW). The spiked feed water contains PC classes of analgesics/anti-inflammatory, anti-hypertensives, beta-blockers, and psychiatric/antidepressants. The percentage difference between feed and permeate was measured. While the fouling properties of the membranes are also evaluated using STP and HWW as feed, along with the pure water flux in a variable-pressure setting, the results showed that NFX exhibits excellent, consistent rejection for the targeted PCs (&gt;80 %). GC showed a broader range of rejection (10 % to 90 %) and presented a better flux flow than NFX. The main rejection factor is due to the membrane's pore size variation and the layer construction, which refer to the absorption, size exclusion, and diffusion of the PCs instead of the type of feed water and the flux. Current work provides scientific data on the diverse fabrication and market-available types of membranes, which would pose various efficiencies towards the type of targeted pollution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 106320"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of pharmaceutical compounds from sewage effluent by the nanofiltration membrane\",\"authors\":\"Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah ,&nbsp;Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar ,&nbsp;Rosiah Rohani ,&nbsp;Muhammad Faiz Fadzizi ,&nbsp;Wan Abd Al-Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar ,&nbsp;Khalid Sayed ,&nbsp;Teh Sabariah Binti Abdul Manan ,&nbsp;Antonius Indarto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Membrane is a promising technology for water treatment, and its commercial production has emerged globally. However, commercial membranes' effectiveness is still uncertain due to the new types of contaminants, such as pharmaceutical compounds (PC). Thus, in the current work, the performance of two commercial membranes (NFX and GC) has been evaluated using feed water from the effluent of sewage treatment plants (STP) and hospital wastewater (HWW). The spiked feed water contains PC classes of analgesics/anti-inflammatory, anti-hypertensives, beta-blockers, and psychiatric/antidepressants. The percentage difference between feed and permeate was measured. While the fouling properties of the membranes are also evaluated using STP and HWW as feed, along with the pure water flux in a variable-pressure setting, the results showed that NFX exhibits excellent, consistent rejection for the targeted PCs (&gt;80 %). GC showed a broader range of rejection (10 % to 90 %) and presented a better flux flow than NFX. The main rejection factor is due to the membrane's pore size variation and the layer construction, which refer to the absorption, size exclusion, and diffusion of the PCs instead of the type of feed water and the flux. Current work provides scientific data on the diverse fabrication and market-available types of membranes, which would pose various efficiencies towards the type of targeted pollution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of water process engineering\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of water process engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714424015526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714424015526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

膜是一种前景广阔的水处理技术,其商业化生产已在全球范围内兴起。然而,由于新型污染物(如药物化合物(PC))的出现,商业膜的有效性仍不确定。因此,在目前的工作中,我们使用污水处理厂(STP)和医院废水(HWW)的进水对两种商用膜(NFX 和 GC)的性能进行了评估。加标给水中含有 PC 类镇痛/消炎药、抗高血压药、β-受体阻滞剂和精神/抗抑郁药。测量了进水和渗透水之间的百分比差。虽然还使用 STP 和 HWW 作为进料评估了膜的污垢特性,以及变压设置下的纯水通量,但结果表明,NFX 对目标 PCs 具有出色、一致的抑制作用(80%)。与 NFX 相比,GC 的抑制范围更广(10% 至 90%),流量也更好。主要的排斥因素是由于膜的孔径变化和膜层结构,这与多氯联苯的吸收、尺寸排除和扩散有关,而与进水类型和通量无关。目前的工作提供了有关各种制造和市场上可获得的膜类型的科学数据,这些膜对目标污染类型具有不同的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removal of pharmaceutical compounds from sewage effluent by the nanofiltration membrane
Membrane is a promising technology for water treatment, and its commercial production has emerged globally. However, commercial membranes' effectiveness is still uncertain due to the new types of contaminants, such as pharmaceutical compounds (PC). Thus, in the current work, the performance of two commercial membranes (NFX and GC) has been evaluated using feed water from the effluent of sewage treatment plants (STP) and hospital wastewater (HWW). The spiked feed water contains PC classes of analgesics/anti-inflammatory, anti-hypertensives, beta-blockers, and psychiatric/antidepressants. The percentage difference between feed and permeate was measured. While the fouling properties of the membranes are also evaluated using STP and HWW as feed, along with the pure water flux in a variable-pressure setting, the results showed that NFX exhibits excellent, consistent rejection for the targeted PCs (>80 %). GC showed a broader range of rejection (10 % to 90 %) and presented a better flux flow than NFX. The main rejection factor is due to the membrane's pore size variation and the layer construction, which refer to the absorption, size exclusion, and diffusion of the PCs instead of the type of feed water and the flux. Current work provides scientific data on the diverse fabrication and market-available types of membranes, which would pose various efficiencies towards the type of targeted pollution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of water process engineering
Journal of water process engineering Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.60%
发文量
846
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信