现在是制定统一的法医学分类法的时候了吗?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Michelle D. Miranda , Ciaran H. Niceberg , Claude Roux
{"title":"现在是制定统一的法医学分类法的时候了吗?","authors":"Michelle D. Miranda ,&nbsp;Ciaran H. Niceberg ,&nbsp;Claude Roux","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prompted by disparate data highlighted in responses to a Sydney Declaration survey, this paper examines how forensic science ‘disciplines’ are defined and described by various professional organizations. A considerable degree of disagreement in taxonomic organization of forensic science ‘disciplines’ was uncovered. This paper suggests that the global forensic science community come together to develop and implement a standard taxonomic system for defining, describing and classifying the disciplines/subdisciplines within forensic science. Such uniform taxonomic structure could serve to align education and awareness while at the same time contributing to the goal of professionalization. This taxonomy should be built on a foundation based on underlying forensic science philosophies and principles, such as those delineated in the Sydney Declaration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"365 ","pages":"Article 112252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it time for a unified forensic science taxonomy?\",\"authors\":\"Michelle D. Miranda ,&nbsp;Ciaran H. Niceberg ,&nbsp;Claude Roux\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Prompted by disparate data highlighted in responses to a Sydney Declaration survey, this paper examines how forensic science ‘disciplines’ are defined and described by various professional organizations. A considerable degree of disagreement in taxonomic organization of forensic science ‘disciplines’ was uncovered. This paper suggests that the global forensic science community come together to develop and implement a standard taxonomic system for defining, describing and classifying the disciplines/subdisciplines within forensic science. Such uniform taxonomic structure could serve to align education and awareness while at the same time contributing to the goal of professionalization. This taxonomy should be built on a foundation based on underlying forensic science philosophies and principles, such as those delineated in the Sydney Declaration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic science international\",\"volume\":\"365 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic science international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824003347\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824003347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对悉尼宣言调查的答复中突出显示的数据差异的推动下,本文研究了各专业组织如何定义和描述法医学 "学科"。发现在法医学 "学科 "的分类组织方面存在相当程度的分歧。本文建议全球法医科学界共同制定和实施一个标准的分类系统,用于定义、描述和划分法医科学的学科/分支学科。这种统一的分类结构可用于调整教育和提高认识,同时有助于实现专业化目标。这种分类法应建立在法医学基本理念和原则的基础上,如《悉尼宣言》中所阐述的理念和原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is it time for a unified forensic science taxonomy?
Prompted by disparate data highlighted in responses to a Sydney Declaration survey, this paper examines how forensic science ‘disciplines’ are defined and described by various professional organizations. A considerable degree of disagreement in taxonomic organization of forensic science ‘disciplines’ was uncovered. This paper suggests that the global forensic science community come together to develop and implement a standard taxonomic system for defining, describing and classifying the disciplines/subdisciplines within forensic science. Such uniform taxonomic structure could serve to align education and awareness while at the same time contributing to the goal of professionalization. This taxonomy should be built on a foundation based on underlying forensic science philosophies and principles, such as those delineated in the Sydney Declaration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信