评估 youtube 上肿瘤乳房重建视频的质量和可靠性

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY

JPRAS Open Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jpra.2024.10.006

Daniel Soroudi , Israel Falade , Nina Mehta , Alexis Gursky , Raymond Yin , Siyou Song , Esther Kim

{"title":"评估 youtube 上肿瘤乳房重建视频的质量和可靠性","authors":"Daniel Soroudi , Israel Falade , Nina Mehta , Alexis Gursky , Raymond Yin , Siyou Song , Esther Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jpra.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oncologic breast reconstruction (OBR) is a complex process that requires consideration of multiple factors, including chemoradiation, extent of cancer treatment, and surgical approach. Patients often feel uncertain about the numerous surgical options and may turn to popular social media platforms like YouTube for information. Thus, this study aims to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos related to OBR.</div><div>We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of YouTube videos related to OBR. Search terms were obtained from <span><span>plasticsurgery.org</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> and Google Trends. The first ten videos for each search term were analyzed. Videos were categorized by source and subject matter and independently reviewed by three evaluators using the DISCERN scale.</div><div>This study examined 172 YouTube videos. Five video source categories were identified: Health Care Administrations, Physicians, Non-physician Providers, News Organizations, and Patients. Health Care Administration accounts received the highest overall DISCERN score of 3.6 ± 0.51, followed by Physicians at 2.98 ± 0.93, with News Organization accounts scoring the lowest at 2.22 ± 0.60 (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Videos from academic sources (Physicians and Health Care Administrators) had higher DISCERN scores compared to non-academic sources (News Organizations and Patients), 2.98 ± 0.95 versus 2.28 ± 0.77, respectively (<em>p</em> < 0.001).</div><div>Our findings indicate that videos from academic sources generally exhibit higher DISCERN scores, pointing to a higher content quality and reliability standard. Given the increasing reliance on YouTube for healthcare information, our study underscores the need for healthcare professionals to engage more actively in content creation and dissemination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37996,"journal":{"name":"JPRAS Open","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 311-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the quality and reliability of oncologic breast reconstruction videos on youtube\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Soroudi , Israel Falade , Nina Mehta , Alexis Gursky , Raymond Yin , Siyou Song , Esther Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpra.2024.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Oncologic breast reconstruction (OBR) is a complex process that requires consideration of multiple factors, including chemoradiation, extent of cancer treatment, and surgical approach. Patients often feel uncertain about the numerous surgical options and may turn to popular social media platforms like YouTube for information. Thus, this study aims to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos related to OBR.</div><div>We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of YouTube videos related to OBR. Search terms were obtained from <span><span>plasticsurgery.org</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> and Google Trends. The first ten videos for each search term were analyzed. Videos were categorized by source and subject matter and independently reviewed by three evaluators using the DISCERN scale.</div><div>This study examined 172 YouTube videos. Five video source categories were identified: Health Care Administrations, Physicians, Non-physician Providers, News Organizations, and Patients. Health Care Administration accounts received the highest overall DISCERN score of 3.6 ± 0.51, followed by Physicians at 2.98 ± 0.93, with News Organization accounts scoring the lowest at 2.22 ± 0.60 (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Videos from academic sources (Physicians and Health Care Administrators) had higher DISCERN scores compared to non-academic sources (News Organizations and Patients), 2.98 ± 0.95 versus 2.28 ± 0.77, respectively (<em>p</em> < 0.001).</div><div>Our findings indicate that videos from academic sources generally exhibit higher DISCERN scores, pointing to a higher content quality and reliability standard. Given the increasing reliance on YouTube for healthcare information, our study underscores the need for healthcare professionals to engage more actively in content creation and dissemination.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JPRAS Open\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 311-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JPRAS Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPRAS Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤乳房重建（OBR）是一个复杂的过程，需要考虑多种因素，包括化疗、癌症治疗程度和手术方法。患者往往对众多的手术方案感到不确定，可能会求助于 YouTube 等流行的社交媒体平台来获取信息。因此，本研究旨在评估YouTube上与OBR相关视频的质量和可靠性。我们对YouTube上与OBR相关的视频进行了回顾性横断面分析。搜索词来自 plasticsurgery.org 和 Google Trends。我们对每个搜索词的前十个视频进行了分析。视频按照来源和主题进行分类，并由三位评估者使用 DISCERN 量表进行独立审查。确定了五个视频来源类别：本研究共检查了 172 个 YouTube 视频来源类别：医疗保健管理机构、医生、非医生提供者、新闻机构和患者。医疗保健管理机构账户的 DISCERN 总得分最高，为 3.6 ± 0.51，其次是医生账户，为 2.98 ± 0.93，新闻机构账户得分最低，为 2.22 ± 0.60（p < 0.001）。与非学术来源（新闻机构和患者）相比，学术来源（医生和医疗管理人员）的视频具有更高的 DISCERN 分数，分别为 2.98 ± 0.95 对 2.28 ± 0.77（p < 0.001）。鉴于人们越来越依赖 YouTube 获取医疗保健信息，我们的研究强调了医疗保健专业人员更积极地参与内容创建和传播的必要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluating the quality and reliability of oncologic breast reconstruction videos on youtube

Oncologic breast reconstruction (OBR) is a complex process that requires consideration of multiple factors, including chemoradiation, extent of cancer treatment, and surgical approach. Patients often feel uncertain about the numerous surgical options and may turn to popular social media platforms like YouTube for information. Thus, this study aims to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos related to OBR.

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of YouTube videos related to OBR. Search terms were obtained from plasticsurgery.org and Google Trends. The first ten videos for each search term were analyzed. Videos were categorized by source and subject matter and independently reviewed by three evaluators using the DISCERN scale.

This study examined 172 YouTube videos. Five video source categories were identified: Health Care Administrations, Physicians, Non-physician Providers, News Organizations, and Patients. Health Care Administration accounts received the highest overall DISCERN score of 3.6 ± 0.51, followed by Physicians at 2.98 ± 0.93, with News Organization accounts scoring the lowest at 2.22 ± 0.60 (p < 0.001). Videos from academic sources (Physicians and Health Care Administrators) had higher DISCERN scores compared to non-academic sources (News Organizations and Patients), 2.98 ± 0.95 versus 2.28 ± 0.77, respectively (p < 0.001).

Our findings indicate that videos from academic sources generally exhibit higher DISCERN scores, pointing to a higher content quality and reliability standard. Given the increasing reliance on YouTube for healthcare information, our study underscores the need for healthcare professionals to engage more actively in content creation and dissemination.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JPRAS Open Medicine-Surgery

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

22 weeks

期刊介绍： JPRAS Open is an international, open access journal dedicated to publishing case reports, short communications, and full-length articles. JPRAS Open will provide the most current source of information and references in plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. The Journal is based on the continued need to improve surgical care by providing highlights in general reconstructive surgery; cleft lip, palate and craniofacial surgery; head and neck surgery; skin cancer; breast surgery; hand surgery; lower limb trauma; burns; and aesthetic surgery. The Journal will provide authors with fast publication times.