21基因复发评分测试对T3N0腔隙性乳腺癌化疗选择和临床疗效的影响。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ke Liu, Jia-Yi Li, Guan-Qiao Li, Zhen-Yu He, San-Gang Wu
{"title":"21基因复发评分测试对T3N0腔隙性乳腺癌化疗选择和临床疗效的影响。","authors":"Ke Liu, Jia-Yi Li, Guan-Qiao Li, Zhen-Yu He, San-Gang Wu","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2423683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) testing on chemotherapy decision-making and survival outcomes for T3N0 luminal breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of RS testing in chemotherapy selection and prognosis in these patients.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with T3N0 luminal BC were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype database. The likelihood of undergoing chemotherapy was analyzed using the chi-square test and binomial logistic regression. Survival analysis used Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3186 patients, 852 (26.7%) underwent RS testing. Those who had RS testing demonstrated a lower probability of chemotherapy receipt than those without RS testing (27.0% vs. 47.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Higher RS correlated with increased the probabilities of chemotherapy receipt. The probabilities of chemotherapy for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk were 9.8%, 26.7%, and 60.6%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). RS testing independently improved breast cancer-specific survival (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and overall survival (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In the high-risk cohort, chemotherapy administration was associated with improved overall survival than those who did not (<i>p</i> = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights the significant role of RS testing in guiding treatment decisions and improving survival outcomes for patients with T3N0 luminal BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score testing on chemotherapy selection and clinical outcomes in T3N0 luminal breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ke Liu, Jia-Yi Li, Guan-Qiao Li, Zhen-Yu He, San-Gang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2024.2423683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) testing on chemotherapy decision-making and survival outcomes for T3N0 luminal breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of RS testing in chemotherapy selection and prognosis in these patients.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with T3N0 luminal BC were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype database. The likelihood of undergoing chemotherapy was analyzed using the chi-square test and binomial logistic regression. Survival analysis used Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3186 patients, 852 (26.7%) underwent RS testing. Those who had RS testing demonstrated a lower probability of chemotherapy receipt than those without RS testing (27.0% vs. 47.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Higher RS correlated with increased the probabilities of chemotherapy receipt. The probabilities of chemotherapy for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk were 9.8%, 26.7%, and 60.6%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). RS testing independently improved breast cancer-specific survival (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and overall survival (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In the high-risk cohort, chemotherapy administration was associated with improved overall survival than those who did not (<i>p</i> = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights the significant role of RS testing in guiding treatment decisions and improving survival outcomes for patients with T3N0 luminal BC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2423683\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2423683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:21基因复发评分(RS)检测对T3N0腔隙性乳腺癌(BC)化疗决策和生存结果的作用仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨RS检测对这些患者化疗选择和预后的影响:从监测、流行病学和最终结果Oncotype数据库中纳入被诊断为T3N0管腔乳腺癌的患者。采用卡方检验和二项式逻辑回归分析接受化疗的可能性。生存分析采用卡普兰-梅耶法和多变量考克斯比例危险模型:结果:3186 名患者中,852 人(26.7%)接受了 RS 检测。接受过 RS 检测的患者接受化疗的概率低于未接受 RS 检测的患者(27.0% vs. 47.5%,p p p p = 0.038):我们的研究强调了RS检测在指导治疗决策和改善T3N0腔隙性BC患者生存预后方面的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score testing on chemotherapy selection and clinical outcomes in T3N0 luminal breast cancer.

Background: The role of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) testing on chemotherapy decision-making and survival outcomes for T3N0 luminal breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of RS testing in chemotherapy selection and prognosis in these patients.

Research design and methods: Patients diagnosed with T3N0 luminal BC were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype database. The likelihood of undergoing chemotherapy was analyzed using the chi-square test and binomial logistic regression. Survival analysis used Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Of the 3186 patients, 852 (26.7%) underwent RS testing. Those who had RS testing demonstrated a lower probability of chemotherapy receipt than those without RS testing (27.0% vs. 47.5%, p < 0.001). Higher RS correlated with increased the probabilities of chemotherapy receipt. The probabilities of chemotherapy for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk were 9.8%, 26.7%, and 60.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). RS testing independently improved breast cancer-specific survival (p < 0.001) and overall survival (p < 0.001). In the high-risk cohort, chemotherapy administration was associated with improved overall survival than those who did not (p = 0.038).

Conclusions: Our study highlights the significant role of RS testing in guiding treatment decisions and improving survival outcomes for patients with T3N0 luminal BC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信