根据 IVORY 和 LAP-VEGaS 指南评估 YouTube 上内窥镜泪囊鼻腔造口术视频的教育质量。

Mitat Selçuk Bozhöyük, Levent Yücel
{"title":"根据 IVORY 和 LAP-VEGaS 指南评估 YouTube 上内窥镜泪囊鼻腔造口术视频的教育质量。","authors":"Mitat Selçuk Bozhöyük, Levent Yücel","doi":"10.1177/01455613241293867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational quality of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EE-DCR) videos on YouTube with Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO-IFOS (IVORY) and LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) guidelines and to evaluate the correlation of the 2 guidelines. <b>Methods:</b> EE-DCR videos were queried using search terms on YouTube. Views, likes, likes/dislikes ratio, age, and length of videos were noted. Videos were evaluated using the IVORY and LAP-VEGaS guidelines. Two IVORY scores were created: total (IVORY-1) and organ-specific (IVORY-2). The correlation analysis between video features and guideline scores was performed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 61 EE-DCR videos were evaluated. The mean score of LAP-VEGaS was 10.3 (±SD 2.7), the mean IVORY-1 score was 22.5 (±SD 5.5), and the mean IVORY-2 score was 10.6 (±SD 1.94). Correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between the IVORY-1 total score and the number of likes, the duration of the video, the age of the video, and the LAP-VEGaS score. Linear regression analysis showed that higher IVORY-1 scores predicted longer video duration, newer video age, and higher LAP-VEGaS scores. There was a significant association between LAP-VEGaS categories and the IVORY-1 total score (<i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusion:</b> The quality of EE-DCR videos is generally low to moderate. The IVORY and LAP-VEGaS guidelines were found to be correlated with each other. Both guidelines can be used to evaluate EE-DCR videos and otolaryngology surgical education videos in general. We believe that scales such as IVORY and LAP-VEGaS may be improved according to specific surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613241293867"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Educational Quality of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Videos on YouTube with IVORY and LAP-VEGaS Guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Mitat Selçuk Bozhöyük, Levent Yücel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613241293867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational quality of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EE-DCR) videos on YouTube with Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO-IFOS (IVORY) and LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) guidelines and to evaluate the correlation of the 2 guidelines. <b>Methods:</b> EE-DCR videos were queried using search terms on YouTube. Views, likes, likes/dislikes ratio, age, and length of videos were noted. Videos were evaluated using the IVORY and LAP-VEGaS guidelines. Two IVORY scores were created: total (IVORY-1) and organ-specific (IVORY-2). The correlation analysis between video features and guideline scores was performed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 61 EE-DCR videos were evaluated. The mean score of LAP-VEGaS was 10.3 (±SD 2.7), the mean IVORY-1 score was 22.5 (±SD 5.5), and the mean IVORY-2 score was 10.6 (±SD 1.94). Correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between the IVORY-1 total score and the number of likes, the duration of the video, the age of the video, and the LAP-VEGaS score. Linear regression analysis showed that higher IVORY-1 scores predicted longer video duration, newer video age, and higher LAP-VEGaS scores. There was a significant association between LAP-VEGaS categories and the IVORY-1 total score (<i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusion:</b> The quality of EE-DCR videos is generally low to moderate. The IVORY and LAP-VEGaS guidelines were found to be correlated with each other. Both guidelines can be used to evaluate EE-DCR videos and otolaryngology surgical education videos in general. We believe that scales such as IVORY and LAP-VEGaS may be improved according to specific surgical procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1455613241293867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear, nose, & throat journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241293867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241293867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在根据 YO-IFOS 耳鼻喉科教学视频(IVORY)和 LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS(LAP-VEGaS)指南评估 YouTube 上的鼻内镜泪囊鼻腔吻合术(EE-DCR)视频的教学质量,并评估这两种指南的相关性。方法:使用 YouTube 上的搜索条件查询 EE-DCR 视频。记录了视频的浏览量、喜欢、喜欢/不喜欢比例、年龄和长度。使用 IVORY 和 LAP-VEGaS 指南对视频进行评估。创建了两个 IVORY 分数:总分(IVORY-1)和器官特异性分数(IVORY-2)。对视频特征和指南评分进行了相关性分析。结果:共评估了 61 个 EE-DCR 视频。LAP-VEGaS 的平均得分为 10.3(±SD 2.7)分,IVORY-1 的平均得分为 22.5(±SD 5.5)分,IVORY-2 的平均得分为 10.6(±SD 1.94)分。相关分析表明,IVORY-1 总分与点赞数、视频时长、视频年龄和 LAP-VEGaS 评分之间存在统计学意义上的显著相关性。线性回归分析表明,IVORY-1 分数越高,视频持续时间越长,视频年龄越新,LAP-VEGaS 分数越高。LAP-VEGaS 类别与 IVORY-1 总分之间存在明显关联(P < .001)。结论:EE-DCR 视频的质量一般处于中低水平。研究发现,IVORY 和 LAP-VEGaS 指南相互关联。这两种指南均可用于评估 EE-DCR 视频和耳鼻喉科手术教育视频。我们认为,IVORY 和 LAP-VEGaS 等量表可根据具体的手术程序加以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Educational Quality of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Videos on YouTube with IVORY and LAP-VEGaS Guidelines.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational quality of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EE-DCR) videos on YouTube with Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO-IFOS (IVORY) and LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) guidelines and to evaluate the correlation of the 2 guidelines. Methods: EE-DCR videos were queried using search terms on YouTube. Views, likes, likes/dislikes ratio, age, and length of videos were noted. Videos were evaluated using the IVORY and LAP-VEGaS guidelines. Two IVORY scores were created: total (IVORY-1) and organ-specific (IVORY-2). The correlation analysis between video features and guideline scores was performed. Results: A total of 61 EE-DCR videos were evaluated. The mean score of LAP-VEGaS was 10.3 (±SD 2.7), the mean IVORY-1 score was 22.5 (±SD 5.5), and the mean IVORY-2 score was 10.6 (±SD 1.94). Correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between the IVORY-1 total score and the number of likes, the duration of the video, the age of the video, and the LAP-VEGaS score. Linear regression analysis showed that higher IVORY-1 scores predicted longer video duration, newer video age, and higher LAP-VEGaS scores. There was a significant association between LAP-VEGaS categories and the IVORY-1 total score (P < .001). Conclusion: The quality of EE-DCR videos is generally low to moderate. The IVORY and LAP-VEGaS guidelines were found to be correlated with each other. Both guidelines can be used to evaluate EE-DCR videos and otolaryngology surgical education videos in general. We believe that scales such as IVORY and LAP-VEGaS may be improved according to specific surgical procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信