{"title":"改良下缘截骨术能否改善双侧矢状面劈裂截骨术的手术效果?","authors":"Cihan Topan, Suheyb Bilge, Ahmet Emin Demirbas","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the effect of lower border osteotomy on the lingual split pattern and IAN in BSSO procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study comprised 32 patients (64 operated sides) who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) due to dentofacial abnormalities between the periods of April 2021 and April 2022. In the mandible, 32 sides (the conventional group) received standard BSSO surgery, while 32 sides (the modified group) additionally received lower border osteotomy. Data regarding the split difficulty of the mandibular in BSSO surgery and the recovery status of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) one year after surgery were obtained and evaluated from patient records. The fracture line was radiographically evaluated for the lingual split pattern following surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was observed in favor of the modified group when the mandibular split difficulty of the groups was compared (p = 0.032). The split time of the modified group was found to be statistically shorter than the conventional group (p ≤ 0.001). The mean numbness level of the modified group one year after surgery was statistically significantly lower than that of the conventional group (p = 0.019). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of lingual fracture pattern, the rate of type 1 (87.5 %) fracture was higher in the modified group compared to the other group (68.8 %) (p = 0.089).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lower border osteotomy performed in addition to the conventional BSSO surgery allows the split procedure easier and in a shorter time. The modification resulted in an increased incidence of type 1 lingual fracture pattern in the mandible. The neurosensory recovery capacity of the IAN in the postoperative period is higher in areas where lower-border osteotomies are performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the modified inferior border osteotomy improve the surgical outcomes in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy?\",\"authors\":\"Cihan Topan, Suheyb Bilge, Ahmet Emin Demirbas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the effect of lower border osteotomy on the lingual split pattern and IAN in BSSO procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study comprised 32 patients (64 operated sides) who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) due to dentofacial abnormalities between the periods of April 2021 and April 2022. In the mandible, 32 sides (the conventional group) received standard BSSO surgery, while 32 sides (the modified group) additionally received lower border osteotomy. Data regarding the split difficulty of the mandibular in BSSO surgery and the recovery status of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) one year after surgery were obtained and evaluated from patient records. The fracture line was radiographically evaluated for the lingual split pattern following surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was observed in favor of the modified group when the mandibular split difficulty of the groups was compared (p = 0.032). The split time of the modified group was found to be statistically shorter than the conventional group (p ≤ 0.001). The mean numbness level of the modified group one year after surgery was statistically significantly lower than that of the conventional group (p = 0.019). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of lingual fracture pattern, the rate of type 1 (87.5 %) fracture was higher in the modified group compared to the other group (68.8 %) (p = 0.089).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lower border osteotomy performed in addition to the conventional BSSO surgery allows the split procedure easier and in a shorter time. The modification resulted in an increased incidence of type 1 lingual fracture pattern in the mandible. The neurosensory recovery capacity of the IAN in the postoperative period is higher in areas where lower-border osteotomies are performed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102122\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does the modified inferior border osteotomy improve the surgical outcomes in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy?
Background: To investigate the effect of lower border osteotomy on the lingual split pattern and IAN in BSSO procedures.
Materials and methods: The study comprised 32 patients (64 operated sides) who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) due to dentofacial abnormalities between the periods of April 2021 and April 2022. In the mandible, 32 sides (the conventional group) received standard BSSO surgery, while 32 sides (the modified group) additionally received lower border osteotomy. Data regarding the split difficulty of the mandibular in BSSO surgery and the recovery status of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) one year after surgery were obtained and evaluated from patient records. The fracture line was radiographically evaluated for the lingual split pattern following surgery.
Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in favor of the modified group when the mandibular split difficulty of the groups was compared (p = 0.032). The split time of the modified group was found to be statistically shorter than the conventional group (p ≤ 0.001). The mean numbness level of the modified group one year after surgery was statistically significantly lower than that of the conventional group (p = 0.019). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of lingual fracture pattern, the rate of type 1 (87.5 %) fracture was higher in the modified group compared to the other group (68.8 %) (p = 0.089).
Conclusion: The lower border osteotomy performed in addition to the conventional BSSO surgery allows the split procedure easier and in a shorter time. The modification resulted in an increased incidence of type 1 lingual fracture pattern in the mandible. The neurosensory recovery capacity of the IAN in the postoperative period is higher in areas where lower-border osteotomies are performed.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.