评估问题解决能力的最佳做法。

IF 3.8 4区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101313

Beth Janetski , Patricia Wigle , Curtis G. Jefferson

{"title":"评估问题解决能力的最佳做法。","authors":"Beth Janetski , Patricia Wigle , Curtis G. Jefferson","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To explore best practices for the achievement and assessment of the problem-solving subdomain of the Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Practice Activities in pharmacy education, including problem-solving, critical thinking, and creative thinking (innovative mindset).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Measuring all 3 of these individual skills is challenging but tools and approaches exist in the literature. Common approaches include standardized instruments and validated rubrics for assignment design and performance assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>More work is needed in continuing to define and refine best practices in this area. It appears the coupling of standardized tools with the use of validated rubrics may be necessary to achieve accurate measurement of student achievement in this subdomain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"88 12","pages":"Article 101313"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best Practices for Assessing Problem-Solving\",\"authors\":\"Beth Janetski , Patricia Wigle , Curtis G. Jefferson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To explore best practices for the achievement and assessment of the problem-solving subdomain of the Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Practice Activities in pharmacy education, including problem-solving, critical thinking, and creative thinking (innovative mindset).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Measuring all 3 of these individual skills is challenging but tools and approaches exist in the literature. Common approaches include standardized instruments and validated rubrics for assignment design and performance assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>More work is needed in continuing to define and refine best practices in this area. It appears the coupling of standardized tools with the use of validated rubrics may be necessary to achieve accurate measurement of student achievement in this subdomain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"88 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 101313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110327\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目标：探索在药学教育中实现和评估课程成果和委托实践活动（COEPA）问题解决子域的最佳实践，包括问题解决、批判性思维和创造性思维（创新思维）：研究结果：衡量这三种单项技能具有挑战性，但文献中确实存在相关工具和方法。常见的方法包括标准化工具以及用于作业设计和成绩评估的经过验证的评分标准。要准确衡量学生在这一子领域的成绩，似乎有必要将标准化工具与经过验证的评分标准结合起来使用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Best Practices for Assessing Problem-Solving

Objectives

To explore best practices for the achievement and assessment of the problem-solving subdomain of the Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Practice Activities in pharmacy education, including problem-solving, critical thinking, and creative thinking (innovative mindset).

Findings

Measuring all 3 of these individual skills is challenging but tools and approaches exist in the literature. Common approaches include standardized instruments and validated rubrics for assignment design and performance assessment.

Summary

More work is needed in continuing to define and refine best practices in this area. It appears the coupling of standardized tools with the use of validated rubrics may be necessary to achieve accurate measurement of student achievement in this subdomain.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 医学-学科教育

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

15.20%

发文量

114

期刊介绍： The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.