探索利益相关者对使用人工智能诊断罕见和非典型感染的看法。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Aysun Tekin, Svetlana Herasevich, Sarah Minteer, Ognjen Gajic, Amelia Barwise
{"title":"探索利益相关者对使用人工智能诊断罕见和非典型感染的看法。","authors":"Aysun Tekin, Svetlana Herasevich, Sarah Minteer, Ognjen Gajic, Amelia Barwise","doi":"10.1055/a-2451-9046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate critical care provider perspectives about diagnostic practices for rare and atypical infections and the potential for using artificial intelligence (AI) as a decision-support system (DSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an anonymous web-based survey among critical care providers at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 11/25/2023 and 1/15/2024, to evaluate their experience with rare and atypical infection diagnostic processes and AI-based DSSs. We also assessed the perceived usefulness of AI-based DSSs, their potential impact on improving diagnostic practices for rare and atypical infections, and the perceived risks and benefits of their use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47/143 providers completed the survey. 38/47 agreed that there was a delay in diagnosing rare and atypical infections. Among those who agreed, limited assessment of specific patient factors and failure to consider them were the most frequently cited important contributing factors (33/38). 38/47 reported familiarity with the AI-based DSS applications available to critical care providers. Less than half (18/38) thought AI-based DSSs often provided valuable insights for patient care, but almost three quarters (34/47) thought AI-based DDSs often provided valuable insight when specifically asked about their ability to improve the diagnosis of rare and atypical infections. All respondents rated reliability as important in enhancing the perceived utility of AI-based DSSs (47/47) and almost all rated interpretability and integration into the workflow as important (45/47). The primary concern about implementing an AI-based DSS in this context was alert fatigue (44/47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most critical care providers perceived that there are delays in diagnosing rare infections, indicating inadequate assessment and consideration of the diagnosis as the major contributors. Reliability, interpretability, workflow integration, and alert fatigue emerged as key factors impacting usability of AI-based DSS. These findings will inform the development and implementation of an AI-based diagnostic algorithm to aid in identifying rare and atypical infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring stakeholder perceptions about using artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of rare and atypical infections.\",\"authors\":\"Aysun Tekin, Svetlana Herasevich, Sarah Minteer, Ognjen Gajic, Amelia Barwise\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2451-9046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate critical care provider perspectives about diagnostic practices for rare and atypical infections and the potential for using artificial intelligence (AI) as a decision-support system (DSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an anonymous web-based survey among critical care providers at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 11/25/2023 and 1/15/2024, to evaluate their experience with rare and atypical infection diagnostic processes and AI-based DSSs. We also assessed the perceived usefulness of AI-based DSSs, their potential impact on improving diagnostic practices for rare and atypical infections, and the perceived risks and benefits of their use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47/143 providers completed the survey. 38/47 agreed that there was a delay in diagnosing rare and atypical infections. Among those who agreed, limited assessment of specific patient factors and failure to consider them were the most frequently cited important contributing factors (33/38). 38/47 reported familiarity with the AI-based DSS applications available to critical care providers. Less than half (18/38) thought AI-based DSSs often provided valuable insights for patient care, but almost three quarters (34/47) thought AI-based DDSs often provided valuable insight when specifically asked about their ability to improve the diagnosis of rare and atypical infections. All respondents rated reliability as important in enhancing the perceived utility of AI-based DSSs (47/47) and almost all rated interpretability and integration into the workflow as important (45/47). The primary concern about implementing an AI-based DSS in this context was alert fatigue (44/47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most critical care providers perceived that there are delays in diagnosing rare infections, indicating inadequate assessment and consideration of the diagnosis as the major contributors. Reliability, interpretability, workflow integration, and alert fatigue emerged as key factors impacting usability of AI-based DSS. These findings will inform the development and implementation of an AI-based diagnostic algorithm to aid in identifying rare and atypical infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2451-9046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2451-9046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估重症监护提供者对罕见和非典型感染诊断方法的看法,以及将人工智能(AI)用作决策支持系统(DSS)的潜力:我们在 2023 年 11 月 25 日至 2024 年 1 月 15 日期间对梅奥罗切斯特诊所的重症监护提供者进行了匿名网络调查,以评估他们在罕见和非典型感染诊断流程以及基于人工智能的 DSS 方面的经验。我们还评估了基于人工智能的诊断支持系统的实用性、其对改善罕见和非典型感染诊断方法的潜在影响,以及使用这些系统的风险和益处:共有 47/143 名医疗服务提供者完成了调查。38/47的医疗服务提供者认为罕见和非典型感染的诊断存在延误。在同意这一观点的医疗服务提供者中,最常提到的重要原因是对患者特定因素的评估有限以及没有考虑到这些因素(33/38)。38/47 的人表示熟悉危重症医疗服务提供者可使用的基于人工智能的 DSS 应用程序。不到一半的受访者(18/38)认为基于人工智能的 DSS 经常能为患者护理提供有价值的见解,但当被特别问及基于人工智能的 DDS 在改善罕见和非典型感染诊断方面的能力时,将近四分之三的受访者(34/47)认为基于人工智能的 DDS 经常能提供有价值的见解。所有受访者都认为可靠性对于提高人工智能数据采集系统的实用性非常重要(47/47),几乎所有受访者都认为可解释性和与工作流程的整合非常重要(45/47)。在这种情况下,实施基于人工智能的 DSS 的首要问题是警报疲劳(44/47):结论:大多数重症医疗服务提供者认为罕见感染的诊断存在延误,这表明诊断评估和考虑不足是主要原因。可靠性、可解释性、工作流程整合和警报疲劳是影响基于人工智能的 DSS 可用性的关键因素。这些发现将为开发和实施基于人工智能的诊断算法提供信息,以帮助识别罕见和非典型感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring stakeholder perceptions about using artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of rare and atypical infections.

Objectives: To evaluate critical care provider perspectives about diagnostic practices for rare and atypical infections and the potential for using artificial intelligence (AI) as a decision-support system (DSS).

Methods: We conducted an anonymous web-based survey among critical care providers at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 11/25/2023 and 1/15/2024, to evaluate their experience with rare and atypical infection diagnostic processes and AI-based DSSs. We also assessed the perceived usefulness of AI-based DSSs, their potential impact on improving diagnostic practices for rare and atypical infections, and the perceived risks and benefits of their use.

Results: A total of 47/143 providers completed the survey. 38/47 agreed that there was a delay in diagnosing rare and atypical infections. Among those who agreed, limited assessment of specific patient factors and failure to consider them were the most frequently cited important contributing factors (33/38). 38/47 reported familiarity with the AI-based DSS applications available to critical care providers. Less than half (18/38) thought AI-based DSSs often provided valuable insights for patient care, but almost three quarters (34/47) thought AI-based DDSs often provided valuable insight when specifically asked about their ability to improve the diagnosis of rare and atypical infections. All respondents rated reliability as important in enhancing the perceived utility of AI-based DSSs (47/47) and almost all rated interpretability and integration into the workflow as important (45/47). The primary concern about implementing an AI-based DSS in this context was alert fatigue (44/47).

Conclusion: Most critical care providers perceived that there are delays in diagnosing rare infections, indicating inadequate assessment and consideration of the diagnosis as the major contributors. Reliability, interpretability, workflow integration, and alert fatigue emerged as key factors impacting usability of AI-based DSS. These findings will inform the development and implementation of an AI-based diagnostic algorithm to aid in identifying rare and atypical infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信