用于分娩镇痛的耳穴疗法:系统回顾和元分析。

IF 0.9 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Velan Arumugam, Arthi Balakrishnan, V Venugopal, Poonguzhali S, Gayathri Annamalai, Prabu Narasimman, S T Venkateswaran, Maheshkumar Kuppusamy
{"title":"用于分娩镇痛的耳穴疗法:系统回顾和元分析。","authors":"Velan Arumugam, Arthi Balakrishnan, V Venugopal, Poonguzhali S, Gayathri Annamalai, Prabu Narasimman, S T Venkateswaran, Maheshkumar Kuppusamy","doi":"10.51507/j.jams.2024.17.5.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Labor pain presents significant challenges during childbirth, necessitating effective pain management strategies. Auriculotherapy, a non-pharmacological intervention targeting specific ear points, has been explored as a potential solution for alleviating labor pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of auriculotherapy in reducing labor pain intensity and improving maternal satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Data resources: </strong>The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until December 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating auriculotherapy as an intervention for labor pain management.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Two authors independently conducted literature selection based on predefined criteria (i.e., RCTs assessing auriculotherapy for labor pain management).</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data extraction was performed independently by two authors, and a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The pooled mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI), was calculated to estimate the effect size.</p><p><strong>Main outcome(s) and measure(s): </strong>The primary outcome was labor pain intensity measured on the visual analog scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analysis of five RCTs involving 451 patients revealed a significant reduction in labor pain following auriculotherapy compared with no treatment (MD, -1.78; 95% CI, -2.62 to -0.93). However, significant heterogeneity was observed among the included studies (I<sup>2</sup>, 87%; <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Despite the observed heterogeneity, this meta-analysis suggests that auriculotherapy holds promise as a non-pharmacological intervention for alleviating labor pain. Further investigation is warranted to refine auriculotherapy protocols and assess its long-term effects, thereby enhancing its potential as a viable option for labor pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":46854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","volume":"17 5","pages":"158-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auriculotherapy for Labour Pain Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Velan Arumugam, Arthi Balakrishnan, V Venugopal, Poonguzhali S, Gayathri Annamalai, Prabu Narasimman, S T Venkateswaran, Maheshkumar Kuppusamy\",\"doi\":\"10.51507/j.jams.2024.17.5.158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Labor pain presents significant challenges during childbirth, necessitating effective pain management strategies. Auriculotherapy, a non-pharmacological intervention targeting specific ear points, has been explored as a potential solution for alleviating labor pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of auriculotherapy in reducing labor pain intensity and improving maternal satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Data resources: </strong>The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until December 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating auriculotherapy as an intervention for labor pain management.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Two authors independently conducted literature selection based on predefined criteria (i.e., RCTs assessing auriculotherapy for labor pain management).</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data extraction was performed independently by two authors, and a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The pooled mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI), was calculated to estimate the effect size.</p><p><strong>Main outcome(s) and measure(s): </strong>The primary outcome was labor pain intensity measured on the visual analog scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analysis of five RCTs involving 451 patients revealed a significant reduction in labor pain following auriculotherapy compared with no treatment (MD, -1.78; 95% CI, -2.62 to -0.93). However, significant heterogeneity was observed among the included studies (I<sup>2</sup>, 87%; <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Despite the observed heterogeneity, this meta-analysis suggests that auriculotherapy holds promise as a non-pharmacological intervention for alleviating labor pain. Further investigation is warranted to refine auriculotherapy protocols and assess its long-term effects, thereby enhancing its potential as a viable option for labor pain management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"158-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2024.17.5.158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2024.17.5.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:分娩疼痛是分娩过程中的重大挑战,需要采取有效的疼痛管理策略。耳穴疗法是一种针对特定耳穴的非药物干预方法,已被视为缓解分娩疼痛的一种潜在解决方案:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估耳穴疗法在降低分娩疼痛强度和提高产妇满意度方面的疗效:从开始到 2023 年 12 月,在 PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect 和 Cochrane Library 等电子数据库中检索了将耳穴疗法作为分娩镇痛干预措施的随机对照试验 (RCT):两位作者根据预先设定的标准(即评估耳穴疗法用于分娩镇痛的 RCT)独立进行文献筛选:数据提取由两位作者独立完成,采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。主要结果和测量指标:主要结果是分娩疼痛强度:主要结果是以视觉模拟量表测量的分娩疼痛强度:对涉及 451 名患者的五项 RCT 进行的 Meta 分析表明,与不进行治疗相比,耳穴疗法可显著减轻分娩疼痛(MD,-1.78;95% CI,-2.62 至 -0.93)。然而,在纳入的研究中观察到了明显的异质性(I2,87%;P<0.01):尽管存在观察到的异质性,但这项荟萃分析表明,耳穴疗法作为一种非药物干预措施,有望缓解分娩疼痛。有必要进行进一步研究,以完善耳穴疗法方案并评估其长期效果,从而提高其作为分娩镇痛可行方案的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auriculotherapy for Labour Pain Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Labor pain presents significant challenges during childbirth, necessitating effective pain management strategies. Auriculotherapy, a non-pharmacological intervention targeting specific ear points, has been explored as a potential solution for alleviating labor pain.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of auriculotherapy in reducing labor pain intensity and improving maternal satisfaction.

Data resources: The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until December 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating auriculotherapy as an intervention for labor pain management.

Study selection: Two authors independently conducted literature selection based on predefined criteria (i.e., RCTs assessing auriculotherapy for labor pain management).

Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction was performed independently by two authors, and a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The pooled mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI), was calculated to estimate the effect size.

Main outcome(s) and measure(s): The primary outcome was labor pain intensity measured on the visual analog scale.

Results: Meta-analysis of five RCTs involving 451 patients revealed a significant reduction in labor pain following auriculotherapy compared with no treatment (MD, -1.78; 95% CI, -2.62 to -0.93). However, significant heterogeneity was observed among the included studies (I2, 87%; p < 0.01).

Conclusions and relevance: Despite the observed heterogeneity, this meta-analysis suggests that auriculotherapy holds promise as a non-pharmacological intervention for alleviating labor pain. Further investigation is warranted to refine auriculotherapy protocols and assess its long-term effects, thereby enhancing its potential as a viable option for labor pain management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine. Manuscripts should fall into one of the categories: topical review, original research paper, brief ... click here for full Aims & Scope The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信