使用和不使用底漆粘接后的正畸托槽失败率 - 系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"使用和不使用底漆粘接后的正畸托槽失败率 - 系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the difference in failure rates between orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured primer and those bonded without primer.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>An electronic search of five databases and additional manual searches were performed until January 2024. Randomized and prospective non-randomized controlled trials directly comparing the bracket failure rate with and without primer. Two authors independently collected study characteristics by extracting outcome data from pre-defined sheets. After evaluating the risk of bias, the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with random-effects models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four studies were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative analysis. The analysis included data from 199 patients (1691 brackets with primer and 1646 brackets without primer). Random effects of pooled meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in the bracket failure rates (odds ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.50, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.010, [95% CI 1.10 to 2.05]). The risk of failure was 1.5 times greater when brackets were bonded without primer.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results should be interpreted in the context of the limited sample size, even though there was a substantial difference in the failure rates of brackets with and without a primer, favouring the use of a primer. Furthermore, the validity of the finding may be limited by potential variables such as patient factors, clinician expertise, and isolation. More extensive research is required to validate these findings (PROSPERO CRD42024593134).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthodontic bracket failure rate after bonding with and without primer – A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the difference in failure rates between orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured primer and those bonded without primer.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>An electronic search of five databases and additional manual searches were performed until January 2024. Randomized and prospective non-randomized controlled trials directly comparing the bracket failure rate with and without primer. Two authors independently collected study characteristics by extracting outcome data from pre-defined sheets. After evaluating the risk of bias, the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with random-effects models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four studies were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative analysis. The analysis included data from 199 patients (1691 brackets with primer and 1646 brackets without primer). Random effects of pooled meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in the bracket failure rates (odds ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.50, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.010, [95% CI 1.10 to 2.05]). The risk of failure was 1.5 times greater when brackets were bonded without primer.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results should be interpreted in the context of the limited sample size, even though there was a substantial difference in the failure rates of brackets with and without a primer, favouring the use of a primer. Furthermore, the validity of the finding may be limited by potential variables such as patient factors, clinician expertise, and isolation. More extensive research is required to validate these findings (PROSPERO CRD42024593134).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722724000901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722724000901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较使用光固化底漆粘接的正畸托槽与不使用底漆粘接的正畸托槽失败率的差异:对五个数据库进行了电子检索,并在 2024 年 1 月之前进行了额外的人工检索。随机和前瞻性非随机对照试验直接比较了使用和不使用底胶的托槽失败率。两位作者通过从预先定义的表单中提取结果数据,独立收集研究特征。在评估了偏倚风险后,采用随机效应模型计算了几率比例和 95% 置信区间 (CI):采用定性和定量分析对四项研究进行了评估。分析包括来自 199 名患者的数据(1691 个括号含引物,1646 个括号不含引物)。汇总荟萃分析的随机效应显示,支架失败率在统计学上存在显著差异(几率比=1.50,P=0.010,[95% CI 1.10 至 2.05])。在没有底漆的情况下粘接托槽,失败的风险要高出1.5倍:尽管使用和不使用底漆粘接的托槽失败率有很大差异,但应在样本量有限的情况下对结果进行解释,并倾向于使用底漆。此外,研究结果的有效性可能会受到患者因素、临床医生专业知识和隔离等潜在变量的限制。需要进行更广泛的研究来验证这些发现(PROSPERO CRD42024593134)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orthodontic bracket failure rate after bonding with and without primer – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To compare the difference in failure rates between orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured primer and those bonded without primer.

Material and methods

An electronic search of five databases and additional manual searches were performed until January 2024. Randomized and prospective non-randomized controlled trials directly comparing the bracket failure rate with and without primer. Two authors independently collected study characteristics by extracting outcome data from pre-defined sheets. After evaluating the risk of bias, the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with random-effects models.

Results

Four studies were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative analysis. The analysis included data from 199 patients (1691 brackets with primer and 1646 brackets without primer). Random effects of pooled meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in the bracket failure rates (odds ratio = 1.50, p = 0.010, [95% CI 1.10 to 2.05]). The risk of failure was 1.5 times greater when brackets were bonded without primer.

Conclusion

The results should be interpreted in the context of the limited sample size, even though there was a substantial difference in the failure rates of brackets with and without a primer, favouring the use of a primer. Furthermore, the validity of the finding may be limited by potential variables such as patient factors, clinician expertise, and isolation. More extensive research is required to validate these findings (PROSPERO CRD42024593134).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthodontics
International Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
71
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Une revue de référence dans le domaine de orthodontie et des disciplines frontières Your reference in dentofacial orthopedics International Orthodontics adresse aux orthodontistes, aux dentistes, aux stomatologistes, aux chirurgiens maxillo-faciaux et aux plasticiens de la face, ainsi quà leurs assistant(e)s. International Orthodontics is addressed to orthodontists, dentists, stomatologists, maxillofacial surgeons and facial plastic surgeons, as well as their assistants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信