探索人工智能程序对透镜、白内障和屈光手术信息的理解。

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-09-13 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.4103/meajo.meajo_199_23
Eyupcan Sensoy, Mehmet Citirik
{"title":"探索人工智能程序对透镜、白内障和屈光手术信息的理解。","authors":"Eyupcan Sensoy, Mehmet Citirik","doi":"10.4103/meajo.meajo_199_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the success of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), Bing, and Bard artificial intelligence programs, which were released free of charge by three different manufacturers, in correctly answering questions about lenses, cataract, and refractive surgery, and to investigate whether they are superior to each other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy questions related to lens, cataract, and refractive surgery were obtained from the study questions section of the American Academy of Ophthalmology 2022 to 2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course Lens and Cataract and Refractive Surgery Books. The questions were asked separately for the ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard artificial intelligence programs. The answers were compared with answer keys and grouped as correct or incorrect. The accuracy rates of artificial intelligence programs were compared statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard chatbots gave correct answers to 35 (50%), 43 (61.4%), and 50 (71.4%) questions asked, respectively. The rate of correct answers to the questions of the Bard artificial intelligence program was significantly higher than that of ChatGPT (<i>P</i> = 0.009, Pearson's Chi-square test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the currently released artificial intelligence chatbots can be used to access accurate information about lenses, cataracts, and refractive surgery, one should always be careful about the accuracy of the answers given.</p>","PeriodicalId":18740,"journal":{"name":"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"30 3","pages":"173-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Artificial Intelligence Programs' Understanding of Lens, Cataract, and Refractive Surgery Information.\",\"authors\":\"Eyupcan Sensoy, Mehmet Citirik\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/meajo.meajo_199_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the success of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), Bing, and Bard artificial intelligence programs, which were released free of charge by three different manufacturers, in correctly answering questions about lenses, cataract, and refractive surgery, and to investigate whether they are superior to each other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy questions related to lens, cataract, and refractive surgery were obtained from the study questions section of the American Academy of Ophthalmology 2022 to 2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course Lens and Cataract and Refractive Surgery Books. The questions were asked separately for the ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard artificial intelligence programs. The answers were compared with answer keys and grouped as correct or incorrect. The accuracy rates of artificial intelligence programs were compared statistically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard chatbots gave correct answers to 35 (50%), 43 (61.4%), and 50 (71.4%) questions asked, respectively. The rate of correct answers to the questions of the Bard artificial intelligence program was significantly higher than that of ChatGPT (<i>P</i> = 0.009, Pearson's Chi-square test).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the currently released artificial intelligence chatbots can be used to access accurate information about lenses, cataracts, and refractive surgery, one should always be careful about the accuracy of the answers given.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"173-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495292/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_199_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_199_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在评估 Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer(ChatGPT)、Bing 和 Bard 人工智能程序(由三家不同制造商免费发布)在正确回答有关晶状体、白内障和屈光手术的问题方面的成功率,并研究它们之间是否存在优劣之分:从美国眼科学会 2022 至 2023 年基础与临床科学课程《透镜》和《白内障与屈光手术》书籍的学习问题部分获得了 70 个与透镜、白内障和屈光手术有关的问题。这些问题分别针对 ChatGPT、Bing 和 Bard 人工智能程序提出。将答案与答题卡进行比较,并按正确与否进行分组。统计比较了人工智能程序的准确率:ChatGPT、Bing 和 Bard 聊天机器人分别对 35 个(50%)、43 个(61.4%)和 50 个(71.4%)问题给出了正确答案。Bard 人工智能程序的问题正确回答率明显高于 ChatGPT(P = 0.009,皮尔逊卡方检验):尽管目前发布的人工智能聊天机器人可用于获取有关镜片、白内障和屈光手术的准确信息,但人们应始终注意所给出答案的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Artificial Intelligence Programs' Understanding of Lens, Cataract, and Refractive Surgery Information.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the success of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), Bing, and Bard artificial intelligence programs, which were released free of charge by three different manufacturers, in correctly answering questions about lenses, cataract, and refractive surgery, and to investigate whether they are superior to each other.

Methods: Seventy questions related to lens, cataract, and refractive surgery were obtained from the study questions section of the American Academy of Ophthalmology 2022 to 2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course Lens and Cataract and Refractive Surgery Books. The questions were asked separately for the ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard artificial intelligence programs. The answers were compared with answer keys and grouped as correct or incorrect. The accuracy rates of artificial intelligence programs were compared statistically.

Results: ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard chatbots gave correct answers to 35 (50%), 43 (61.4%), and 50 (71.4%) questions asked, respectively. The rate of correct answers to the questions of the Bard artificial intelligence program was significantly higher than that of ChatGPT (P = 0.009, Pearson's Chi-square test).

Conclusion: Although the currently released artificial intelligence chatbots can be used to access accurate information about lenses, cataracts, and refractive surgery, one should always be careful about the accuracy of the answers given.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology (MEAJO), published four times per year in print and online, is an official journal of the Middle East African Council of Ophthalmology (MEACO). It is an international, peer-reviewed journal whose mission includes publication of original research of interest to ophthalmologists in the Middle East and Africa, and to provide readers with high quality educational review articles from world-renown experts. MEAJO, previously known as Middle East Journal of Ophthalmology (MEJO) was founded by Dr Akef El Maghraby in 1993.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信