为临终病人的远距离照顾者提供社会心理支持的建议。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Franziska A. Herbst PhD, Nils Schneider MD, MPH, Stephanie Stiel PhD
{"title":"为临终病人的远距离照顾者提供社会心理支持的建议。","authors":"Franziska A. Herbst PhD,&nbsp;Nils Schneider MD, MPH,&nbsp;Stephanie Stiel PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The provision of appropriate psychosocial support has a significant impact on quality of life for informal caregivers of terminally ill patients. Long-distance caregivers have specific wishes and needs for psychosocial support.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To date, no formal support measures for long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients have been developed in Germany. The national Delphi study aimed at systematically and empirically generating recommendations for psychosocial support measures, tailored to this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Recommendations were formulated on the basis of qualitative interviews exploring the support experiences and unmet needs of long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients. Experts from hospice and palliative care rated the relevance and feasibility of 10 recommendations using two 4-point Likert-type scales. Additionally, suggestions for improvement were captured via free text fields. Recommendations were deemed to have achieved consensus when ≥ 80% of participants indicated “strongly agree” or “somewhat agree” for both relevance and feasibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 26 experts completed two Delphi rounds. Following the first round, eight of the 10 recommendations were revised according to participant feedback. After the second round, consensus was achieved for five of these revised recommendations. Three recommendations were rejected, as participants regarded them unfeasible due to a perceived lack of personnel resources.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The consensus-based recommendations represent the first empirically grounded guidelines in Germany aimed at addressing the psychosocial needs of long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients. The recommendations seek to raise awareness among both professional and voluntary workers regarding the specific support requirements of this understudied population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 1","pages":"Pages 10-22.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for Psychosocial Support for Long-Distance Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients\",\"authors\":\"Franziska A. Herbst PhD,&nbsp;Nils Schneider MD, MPH,&nbsp;Stephanie Stiel PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The provision of appropriate psychosocial support has a significant impact on quality of life for informal caregivers of terminally ill patients. Long-distance caregivers have specific wishes and needs for psychosocial support.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To date, no formal support measures for long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients have been developed in Germany. The national Delphi study aimed at systematically and empirically generating recommendations for psychosocial support measures, tailored to this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Recommendations were formulated on the basis of qualitative interviews exploring the support experiences and unmet needs of long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients. Experts from hospice and palliative care rated the relevance and feasibility of 10 recommendations using two 4-point Likert-type scales. Additionally, suggestions for improvement were captured via free text fields. Recommendations were deemed to have achieved consensus when ≥ 80% of participants indicated “strongly agree” or “somewhat agree” for both relevance and feasibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 26 experts completed two Delphi rounds. Following the first round, eight of the 10 recommendations were revised according to participant feedback. After the second round, consensus was achieved for five of these revised recommendations. Three recommendations were rejected, as participants regarded them unfeasible due to a perceived lack of personnel resources.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The consensus-based recommendations represent the first empirically grounded guidelines in Germany aimed at addressing the psychosocial needs of long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients. The recommendations seek to raise awareness among both professional and voluntary workers regarding the specific support requirements of this understudied population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 10-22.e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392424010960\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392424010960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:提供适当的社会心理支持对临终病人非正规照顾者的生活质量有重大影响。远距离照护者对社会心理支持有着特殊的愿望和需求:迄今为止,德国尚未制定出针对临终病人远距离照护者的正式支持措施。这项全国性的德尔菲研究旨在通过系统性和经验性的方法,为这一人群量身定制社会心理支持措施:方法:在定性访谈的基础上,对临终病人的远距离照护者的支持经验和未满足的需求进行了探讨,并在此基础上提出了建议。来自临终关怀和姑息治疗领域的专家使用两个 4 分李克特量表对 10 项建议的相关性和可行性进行了评分。此外,还通过自由文本字段收集了改进建议。当≥80%的参与者对相关性和可行性表示 "非常同意 "或 "比较同意 "时,这些建议即被视为已达成共识:共有 26 位专家完成了两轮德尔菲讨论。第一轮之后,根据参与者的反馈意见,对 10 项建议中的 8 项进行了修订。第二轮修订后,对其中 5 项建议达成了共识。有 3 项建议被否决,因为与会者认为这些建议不可行,原因是缺乏人力资源:基于共识的建议是德国第一份以经验为基础的指南,旨在满足临终病人远距离照护者的社会心理需求。这些建议旨在提高专业人员和志愿工作者对这一研究不足人群的特殊支持需求的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommendations for Psychosocial Support for Long-Distance Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients

Context

The provision of appropriate psychosocial support has a significant impact on quality of life for informal caregivers of terminally ill patients. Long-distance caregivers have specific wishes and needs for psychosocial support.

Objectives

To date, no formal support measures for long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients have been developed in Germany. The national Delphi study aimed at systematically and empirically generating recommendations for psychosocial support measures, tailored to this population.

Methods

Recommendations were formulated on the basis of qualitative interviews exploring the support experiences and unmet needs of long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients. Experts from hospice and palliative care rated the relevance and feasibility of 10 recommendations using two 4-point Likert-type scales. Additionally, suggestions for improvement were captured via free text fields. Recommendations were deemed to have achieved consensus when ≥ 80% of participants indicated “strongly agree” or “somewhat agree” for both relevance and feasibility.

Results

A total of 26 experts completed two Delphi rounds. Following the first round, eight of the 10 recommendations were revised according to participant feedback. After the second round, consensus was achieved for five of these revised recommendations. Three recommendations were rejected, as participants regarded them unfeasible due to a perceived lack of personnel resources.

Conclusion

The consensus-based recommendations represent the first empirically grounded guidelines in Germany aimed at addressing the psychosocial needs of long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients. The recommendations seek to raise awareness among both professional and voluntary workers regarding the specific support requirements of this understudied population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信