中国白内障患者使用三焦点人工晶体和扩展景深人工晶体的临床效果:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5571802
Qingzhong Chen, Guangbin Zhang
{"title":"中国白内障患者使用三焦点人工晶体和扩展景深人工晶体的临床效果:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Qingzhong Chen, Guangbin Zhang","doi":"10.1155/2024/5571802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare the standard outcomes between the PanOptix and Symfony multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) in Chinese patients. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective observational cohort study enrolled patients with cataracts between April 2021 and December 2021 at Xiamen Eye Center Affiliated to Xiamen University. The patients were grouped in the PanOptix (TIOL group) and Symfony (EDF group) according to the IOLs implanted. Uncorrected distant, corrected distance, binocular uncorrected intermediate, and near visual acuity (UNVA), distance-corrected intermediate and near VA (DCNVA) , defocus curve, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and visual disturbances were evaluated after 3 months. <b>Results:</b> Forty patients (80 eyes) were enrolled in the study (20/group). Three months after the operation, UNVA (0.13 ± 0.16) and DCNVA (0.08 ± 0.08) were better in the TIOL group than in the EDF group (0.22 ± 0.08 and 0.22 ± 0.08, respectively, <i>p</i>=0.003 and <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). The TIOL group achieved a better-than-0.15-logMAR VA from +0.5 D to -2.5 D (40 cm). VAs of the TIOL group from -1 D (100 cm) to -4 D (25 cm) were better than in the EDF group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the intermediate and far vision outcomes (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Total near-vision spectacle independence was higher in the TIOL group (80%) than in the EDF group (50%) (<i>p</i>=0.039). <b>Conclusion:</b> Compared with EDF, TIOL leads to better near-vision outcomes without significant differences for intermediate and distant vision outcomes. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2100044558.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5571802"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of a Trifocal Versus an Extended Depth of Field Intraocular Lens in Chinese Patients With Cataract: A Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Qingzhong Chen, Guangbin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/5571802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare the standard outcomes between the PanOptix and Symfony multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) in Chinese patients. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective observational cohort study enrolled patients with cataracts between April 2021 and December 2021 at Xiamen Eye Center Affiliated to Xiamen University. The patients were grouped in the PanOptix (TIOL group) and Symfony (EDF group) according to the IOLs implanted. Uncorrected distant, corrected distance, binocular uncorrected intermediate, and near visual acuity (UNVA), distance-corrected intermediate and near VA (DCNVA) , defocus curve, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and visual disturbances were evaluated after 3 months. <b>Results:</b> Forty patients (80 eyes) were enrolled in the study (20/group). Three months after the operation, UNVA (0.13 ± 0.16) and DCNVA (0.08 ± 0.08) were better in the TIOL group than in the EDF group (0.22 ± 0.08 and 0.22 ± 0.08, respectively, <i>p</i>=0.003 and <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). The TIOL group achieved a better-than-0.15-logMAR VA from +0.5 D to -2.5 D (40 cm). VAs of the TIOL group from -1 D (100 cm) to -4 D (25 cm) were better than in the EDF group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the intermediate and far vision outcomes (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Total near-vision spectacle independence was higher in the TIOL group (80%) than in the EDF group (50%) (<i>p</i>=0.039). <b>Conclusion:</b> Compared with EDF, TIOL leads to better near-vision outcomes without significant differences for intermediate and distant vision outcomes. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2100044558.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"5571802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5571802\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5571802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较 PanOptix 和 Symfony 多焦点眼内透镜(MIOL)在中国患者中的标准疗效。研究方法:这项前瞻性队列观察研究招募了2021年4月至2021年12月期间在厦门大学附属厦门眼科中心就诊的白内障患者。根据植入人工晶体的不同,将患者分为 PanOptix(TIOL 组)和 Symfony(EDF 组)。3个月后对未矫正远视力、矫正远视力、双眼未矫正中近视力(UNVA)、矫正中近视力(DCNVA)、散焦曲线、眼镜独立性、对比敏感度(CS)和视力障碍进行评估。结果40 名患者(80 只眼睛)参加了研究(20 人/组)。手术 3 个月后,TIOL 组的 UNVA(0.13 ± 0.16)和 DCNVA(0.08 ± 0.08)优于 EDF 组(分别为 0.22 ± 0.08 和 0.22 ± 0.08,P=0.003 和 P <0.001)。TIOL 组从 +0.5 D 到 -2.5 D(40 厘米)的视力均优于 0.15-logMAR。TIOL 组的视力从 -1 D(100 厘米)到 -4 D(25 厘米)均优于 EDF 组(p < 0.05)。中远视力结果无明显差异(P > 0.05)。TIOL组(80%)的近视力完全独立于EDF组(50%)(p=0.039)。结论:与 EDF 相比,TIOL 的近视效果更好,但中远视效果无显著差异。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:ChiCTR2100044558。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes of a Trifocal Versus an Extended Depth of Field Intraocular Lens in Chinese Patients With Cataract: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: To compare the standard outcomes between the PanOptix and Symfony multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) in Chinese patients. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study enrolled patients with cataracts between April 2021 and December 2021 at Xiamen Eye Center Affiliated to Xiamen University. The patients were grouped in the PanOptix (TIOL group) and Symfony (EDF group) according to the IOLs implanted. Uncorrected distant, corrected distance, binocular uncorrected intermediate, and near visual acuity (UNVA), distance-corrected intermediate and near VA (DCNVA) , defocus curve, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and visual disturbances were evaluated after 3 months. Results: Forty patients (80 eyes) were enrolled in the study (20/group). Three months after the operation, UNVA (0.13 ± 0.16) and DCNVA (0.08 ± 0.08) were better in the TIOL group than in the EDF group (0.22 ± 0.08 and 0.22 ± 0.08, respectively, p=0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). The TIOL group achieved a better-than-0.15-logMAR VA from +0.5 D to -2.5 D (40 cm). VAs of the TIOL group from -1 D (100 cm) to -4 D (25 cm) were better than in the EDF group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the intermediate and far vision outcomes (p > 0.05). Total near-vision spectacle independence was higher in the TIOL group (80%) than in the EDF group (50%) (p=0.039). Conclusion: Compared with EDF, TIOL leads to better near-vision outcomes without significant differences for intermediate and distant vision outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2100044558.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信