事先成像审查对额外诊断测试建议的影响:脊骨神经放射学实践中的成像报告回顾性分析。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Robert D Vining, Kira J Baca, Emma Forlow, Ian McLean
{"title":"事先成像审查对额外诊断测试建议的影响:脊骨神经放射学实践中的成像报告回顾性分析。","authors":"Robert D Vining, Kira J Baca, Emma Forlow, Ian McLean","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of prior imaging review on recommendations for additional diagnostic testing in an academic chiropractic radiology practice. A secondary aim was to explore the influence of prior imaging review on radiographic interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed radiology reports generated from July 18, 2022, to July 18, 2023, from the Palmer College of Chiropractic main campus (Davenport, Iowa) clinic system. Imaging interpretation included an automated search for prior images in an internal picture archival and communication system (PACS). Images from regional health system databases were available and sought by radiologists when (1) unclear radiologic findings had potential clinical implications or (2) prior imaging could clarify potential problems detected in a clinical history. Data were abstracted to a secure adaptive electronic questionnaire and analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 1712 radiographic and 165 musculoskeletal diagnostic ultrasound reports for 1552 unique individuals (811 [52.3%] females and 741 [47.7%] males) with a mean age of 42.1 years (range, 2-93 years). Prior imaging was described in 417 (22.2%) reports; 246 (58.9%) indicated images from internal PACS, 192 (46.0%) indicated images from external PACS, and 21 noted both internal and external PACS. Prior imaging findings were credited with answering a clinical question in 98 (23.5%), and a radiographic question in 228 (54.7%) of 417 reports. The process negated the need for follow-up diagnostic testing recommendations in 119 (28.5%) instances, leading to additional imaging recommendations in 19 (4.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data obtained in this study suggest that comparing current and previous imaging may help reduce unnecessary additional imaging or follow-up diagnostic testing recommendations. Prior imaging review may also facilitate diagnostic confidence and interpretation clarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Prior Imaging Review on Recommendations for Additional Diagnostic Testing: Retrospective Analysis of Imaging Reports in a Chiropractic Radiology Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Robert D Vining, Kira J Baca, Emma Forlow, Ian McLean\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of prior imaging review on recommendations for additional diagnostic testing in an academic chiropractic radiology practice. A secondary aim was to explore the influence of prior imaging review on radiographic interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed radiology reports generated from July 18, 2022, to July 18, 2023, from the Palmer College of Chiropractic main campus (Davenport, Iowa) clinic system. Imaging interpretation included an automated search for prior images in an internal picture archival and communication system (PACS). Images from regional health system databases were available and sought by radiologists when (1) unclear radiologic findings had potential clinical implications or (2) prior imaging could clarify potential problems detected in a clinical history. Data were abstracted to a secure adaptive electronic questionnaire and analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 1712 radiographic and 165 musculoskeletal diagnostic ultrasound reports for 1552 unique individuals (811 [52.3%] females and 741 [47.7%] males) with a mean age of 42.1 years (range, 2-93 years). Prior imaging was described in 417 (22.2%) reports; 246 (58.9%) indicated images from internal PACS, 192 (46.0%) indicated images from external PACS, and 21 noted both internal and external PACS. Prior imaging findings were credited with answering a clinical question in 98 (23.5%), and a radiographic question in 228 (54.7%) of 417 reports. The process negated the need for follow-up diagnostic testing recommendations in 119 (28.5%) instances, leading to additional imaging recommendations in 19 (4.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data obtained in this study suggest that comparing current and previous imaging may help reduce unnecessary additional imaging or follow-up diagnostic testing recommendations. Prior imaging review may also facilitate diagnostic confidence and interpretation clarity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是评估在脊骨神经放射学术实践中,事先影像学审查对额外诊断检测建议的影响。次要目的是探讨事先影像学审查对放射学解释的影响:我们回顾性地查看了帕尔默整脊学院主校区(爱荷华州达文波特市)诊所系统在2022年7月18日至2023年7月18日期间生成的放射学报告。影像解读包括自动搜索内部图片存档和通信系统(PACS)中的先前图像。当出现以下情况时,放射科医生可从区域医疗系统数据库中查找图像:(1) 不明确的放射检查结果可能会对临床产生影响;或 (2) 以前的图像可澄清临床病史中发现的潜在问题。数据被摘录到安全的自适应电子问卷中,并进行描述性分析:我们审查了 1552 名独特个体(811 名 [52.3%] 女性和 741 名 [47.7%] 男性)的 1712 份放射成像报告和 165 份肌肉骨骼超声诊断报告,这些个体的平均年龄为 42.1 岁(范围为 2-93 岁)。417份(22.2%)报告中描述了之前的成像情况;246份(58.9%)报告中的图像来自内部PACS,192份(46.0%)报告中的图像来自外部PACS,21份报告中的图像同时来自内部和外部PACS。在 417 份报告中,有 98 份(23.5%)的临床问题和 228 份(54.7%)的放射学问题是通过之前的成像结果得到解答的。在 119 例(28.5%)报告中,该流程否定了后续诊断检测建议的必要性,在 19 例(4.6%)报告中,该流程导致了额外的成像建议:本研究获得的数据表明,比较当前和之前的影像学检查有助于减少不必要的额外影像学检查或后续诊断检测建议。先前的影像学检查还可增强诊断信心和解释清晰度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Prior Imaging Review on Recommendations for Additional Diagnostic Testing: Retrospective Analysis of Imaging Reports in a Chiropractic Radiology Practice.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of prior imaging review on recommendations for additional diagnostic testing in an academic chiropractic radiology practice. A secondary aim was to explore the influence of prior imaging review on radiographic interpretation.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed radiology reports generated from July 18, 2022, to July 18, 2023, from the Palmer College of Chiropractic main campus (Davenport, Iowa) clinic system. Imaging interpretation included an automated search for prior images in an internal picture archival and communication system (PACS). Images from regional health system databases were available and sought by radiologists when (1) unclear radiologic findings had potential clinical implications or (2) prior imaging could clarify potential problems detected in a clinical history. Data were abstracted to a secure adaptive electronic questionnaire and analyzed descriptively.

Results: We reviewed 1712 radiographic and 165 musculoskeletal diagnostic ultrasound reports for 1552 unique individuals (811 [52.3%] females and 741 [47.7%] males) with a mean age of 42.1 years (range, 2-93 years). Prior imaging was described in 417 (22.2%) reports; 246 (58.9%) indicated images from internal PACS, 192 (46.0%) indicated images from external PACS, and 21 noted both internal and external PACS. Prior imaging findings were credited with answering a clinical question in 98 (23.5%), and a radiographic question in 228 (54.7%) of 417 reports. The process negated the need for follow-up diagnostic testing recommendations in 119 (28.5%) instances, leading to additional imaging recommendations in 19 (4.6%).

Conclusion: Data obtained in this study suggest that comparing current and previous imaging may help reduce unnecessary additional imaging or follow-up diagnostic testing recommendations. Prior imaging review may also facilitate diagnostic confidence and interpretation clarity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信