鼻整形手术美学期望量表的土耳其语翻译与验证。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Agah Yeniceri, Nagihan Gulhan Yasar, Burak Hazır, Melih Cayonu
{"title":"鼻整形手术美学期望量表的土耳其语翻译与验证。","authors":"Agah Yeniceri, Nagihan Gulhan Yasar, Burak Hazır, Melih Cayonu","doi":"10.1055/a-2448-0503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to translate, validate, and culturally adapt the original English version of the Expectations of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Scale (EARS) into Turkish for use in Turkish-speaking communities. Fifty-one patients who wanted to undergo primary rhinoplasty and were literate in Turkish were included in the study. The control group consisted of 81 healthy volunteers who did not require rhinoplasty. A Turkish version of the EARS (EARS-T) was created. The participants completed the EARS-T questionnaire twice, 4-week apart. The internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach's α), the test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), and differences between the patient and control groups (Pearson's chi-square test) were analyzed. A statistically significant difference was found between the age and gender of the patient and control groups (<i>p</i> = 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that this significant difference did not affect the study results (age: <i>p</i> = 0.2; gender: <i>p</i> = 0.12). In addition, a statistically significant difference was found between the scale scores of the control and rhinoplasty groups (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The EARS-T had good internal consistency, with high Cronbach's α scores ranging between 0.74 and 0.87. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated by high ICC scores ranging from 0.71 to 0.87. Our study revealed that the EARS-T has good internal consistency, reliability, and validity. Therefore, it can be used to assess the expectations of aesthetic rhinoplasty patients in preoperative consultation practice and in clinical studies related to rhinoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turkish Translation and Validation of the Expectations of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Agah Yeniceri, Nagihan Gulhan Yasar, Burak Hazır, Melih Cayonu\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2448-0503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to translate, validate, and culturally adapt the original English version of the Expectations of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Scale (EARS) into Turkish for use in Turkish-speaking communities. Fifty-one patients who wanted to undergo primary rhinoplasty and were literate in Turkish were included in the study. The control group consisted of 81 healthy volunteers who did not require rhinoplasty. A Turkish version of the EARS (EARS-T) was created. The participants completed the EARS-T questionnaire twice, 4-week apart. The internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach's α), the test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), and differences between the patient and control groups (Pearson's chi-square test) were analyzed. A statistically significant difference was found between the age and gender of the patient and control groups (<i>p</i> = 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that this significant difference did not affect the study results (age: <i>p</i> = 0.2; gender: <i>p</i> = 0.12). In addition, a statistically significant difference was found between the scale scores of the control and rhinoplasty groups (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The EARS-T had good internal consistency, with high Cronbach's α scores ranging between 0.74 and 0.87. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated by high ICC scores ranging from 0.71 to 0.87. Our study revealed that the EARS-T has good internal consistency, reliability, and validity. Therefore, it can be used to assess the expectations of aesthetic rhinoplasty patients in preoperative consultation practice and in clinical studies related to rhinoplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2448-0503\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2448-0503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在将英文原版的 "鼻整形手术期望量表"(EARS)翻译成土耳其语,并对其进行验证和文化调整,以便在土耳其语社区使用。研究对象包括 51 名希望接受初级鼻整形手术且懂土耳其语的患者。对照组由 81 名不需要进行鼻整形手术的健康志愿者组成。研究人员制作了土耳其语版的 EARS (EARS-T)。参与者两次填写 EARS-T 问卷,每次间隔四周。对量表的内部一致性(Cronbach's α)、重测可靠性(类内相关系数 [ICC])以及患者组和对照组之间的差异(皮尔逊卡方检验)进行了分析。结果发现,患者组和对照组在年龄和性别上的差异具有统计学意义(分别为 p = 0.001 和 p = 0.001)。单变量分析表明,这一显著差异不会影响研究结果(年龄:p = 0.2;性别:p = 0.12)。此外,对照组和鼻整形组的量表评分之间也存在显著的统计学差异(均为 p <0.05)。EARS-T 具有良好的内部一致性,Cronbach's α 分值介于 0.74 和 0.87 之间。测试再测可靠性表现为较高的 ICC 分数,范围在 0.71 到 0.87 之间。我们的研究表明,EARS-T 具有良好的内部一致性、可靠性和有效性。因此,在术前咨询实践和与鼻整形相关的临床研究中,它可用于评估鼻整形美容患者的期望值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Turkish Translation and Validation of the Expectations of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Scale.

The aim of this study was to translate, validate, and culturally adapt the original English version of the Expectations of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Scale (EARS) into Turkish for use in Turkish-speaking communities. Fifty-one patients who wanted to undergo primary rhinoplasty and were literate in Turkish were included in the study. The control group consisted of 81 healthy volunteers who did not require rhinoplasty. A Turkish version of the EARS (EARS-T) was created. The participants completed the EARS-T questionnaire twice, 4-week apart. The internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach's α), the test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), and differences between the patient and control groups (Pearson's chi-square test) were analyzed. A statistically significant difference was found between the age and gender of the patient and control groups (p = 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that this significant difference did not affect the study results (age: p = 0.2; gender: p = 0.12). In addition, a statistically significant difference was found between the scale scores of the control and rhinoplasty groups (all p < 0.05). The EARS-T had good internal consistency, with high Cronbach's α scores ranging between 0.74 and 0.87. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated by high ICC scores ranging from 0.71 to 0.87. Our study revealed that the EARS-T has good internal consistency, reliability, and validity. Therefore, it can be used to assess the expectations of aesthetic rhinoplasty patients in preoperative consultation practice and in clinical studies related to rhinoplasty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facial Plastic Surgery
Facial Plastic Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery is a journal that publishes topic-specific issues covering areas of aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery as it relates to the head, neck, and face. The journal''s scope includes issues devoted to scar revision, periorbital and mid-face rejuvenation, facial trauma, facial implants, rhinoplasty, neck reconstruction, cleft palate, face lifts, as well as various other emerging minimally invasive procedures. Authors provide a global perspective on each topic, critically evaluate recent works in the field, and apply it to clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信