创伤性牙科损伤在不同医疗环境中的普遍性:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.9 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2432
Monika Tysiąc-Miśta, Marta Tanasiewicz, Shayan Amini, Shaghayegh Najary, Mohammad Taghi Baghani, Reza Eftekhar Ashtiani, Shireen Shidfar, Mohammad Javad Nasiri
{"title":"创伤性牙科损伤在不同医疗环境中的普遍性:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Monika Tysiąc-Miśta, Marta Tanasiewicz, Shayan Amini, Shaghayegh Najary, Mohammad Taghi Baghani, Reza Eftekhar Ashtiani, Shireen Shidfar, Mohammad Javad Nasiri","doi":"10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are a global public health concern, impacting individuals of various age groups. This systematic review aimed to consolidate current evidence on TDI prevalence, providing insights for improved management and prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2024. Studies reporting on the prevalence of TDI in various populations were included. We followed PRISMA guidelines in the review process. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study characteristics, and a random-effects model was applied in the meta-analysis using STATA version 14 to pool prevalence rates, while accounting for inter-study variability. Begg's and Egger's tests were conducted to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included data of 151,205 patients from 30 studies across diverse healthcare settings. The prevalence rates varied significantly across studies, ranging from as low as 1.88% to as high as 86.98%. The overall pooled prevalence of TDI, calculated using a random effects model, was 19.48% (95% CI: 11.21% to 27.74%), indicating substantial heterogeneity among the studies (I-squared = 100.0%, p < 0.001). The prevalence varied significantly across different healthcare settings and demographic groups. No evidence of publication bias was found (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review underscores the high prevalence of TDI and highlights the need for targeted preventive strategies and evidence-based interventions in dental trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"e11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traumatic Dental Injuries' Prevalence across Diverse Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Monika Tysiąc-Miśta, Marta Tanasiewicz, Shayan Amini, Shaghayegh Najary, Mohammad Taghi Baghani, Reza Eftekhar Ashtiani, Shireen Shidfar, Mohammad Javad Nasiri\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are a global public health concern, impacting individuals of various age groups. This systematic review aimed to consolidate current evidence on TDI prevalence, providing insights for improved management and prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2024. Studies reporting on the prevalence of TDI in various populations were included. We followed PRISMA guidelines in the review process. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study characteristics, and a random-effects model was applied in the meta-analysis using STATA version 14 to pool prevalence rates, while accounting for inter-study variability. Begg's and Egger's tests were conducted to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included data of 151,205 patients from 30 studies across diverse healthcare settings. The prevalence rates varied significantly across studies, ranging from as low as 1.88% to as high as 86.98%. The overall pooled prevalence of TDI, calculated using a random effects model, was 19.48% (95% CI: 11.21% to 27.74%), indicating substantial heterogeneity among the studies (I-squared = 100.0%, p < 0.001). The prevalence varied significantly across different healthcare settings and demographic groups. No evidence of publication bias was found (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review underscores the high prevalence of TDI and highlights the need for targeted preventive strategies and evidence-based interventions in dental trauma care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"e11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512718/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:创伤性牙科损伤(TDI)是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,影响着不同年龄段的人群。本系统性综述旨在整合目前有关牙外伤流行率的证据,为改进管理和预防策略提供见解:方法:在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库中对 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 7 月 1 日期间发表的研究进行了全面检索。纳入了报告不同人群中 TDI 患病率的研究。我们在审查过程中遵循了 PRISMA 指南。我们使用了描述性统计来总结研究特征,并在荟萃分析中使用 STATA 14 版本的随机效应模型来汇总患病率,同时考虑到研究间的差异性。采用 Begg's 和 Egger's 检验来评估发表偏倚:综述包括来自不同医疗机构的 30 项研究的 151 205 名患者的数据。不同研究的患病率差异很大,最低为 1.88%,最高为 86.98%。使用随机效应模型计算得出的 TDI 总患病率为 19.48%(95% CI:11.21% 至 27.74%),表明各研究之间存在很大的异质性(I 方 = 100.0%,P < 0.001)。在不同的医疗机构和人口群体中,患病率差异很大。没有发现发表偏倚的证据(P > 0.05):本系统综述强调了TDI的高患病率,并强调了在牙科创伤护理中采取有针对性的预防策略和循证干预措施的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Traumatic Dental Injuries' Prevalence across Diverse Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are a global public health concern, impacting individuals of various age groups. This systematic review aimed to consolidate current evidence on TDI prevalence, providing insights for improved management and prevention strategies.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2024. Studies reporting on the prevalence of TDI in various populations were included. We followed PRISMA guidelines in the review process. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study characteristics, and a random-effects model was applied in the meta-analysis using STATA version 14 to pool prevalence rates, while accounting for inter-study variability. Begg's and Egger's tests were conducted to assess publication bias.

Results: The review included data of 151,205 patients from 30 studies across diverse healthcare settings. The prevalence rates varied significantly across studies, ranging from as low as 1.88% to as high as 86.98%. The overall pooled prevalence of TDI, calculated using a random effects model, was 19.48% (95% CI: 11.21% to 27.74%), indicating substantial heterogeneity among the studies (I-squared = 100.0%, p < 0.001). The prevalence varied significantly across different healthcare settings and demographic groups. No evidence of publication bias was found (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: This systematic review underscores the high prevalence of TDI and highlights the need for targeted preventive strategies and evidence-based interventions in dental trauma care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信