基于人工耳蜗植入中心调查的先天性听力损失基因和病毒病因测试:HEARRING 小组的共识建议和未来方向。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Shin-Ichi Usami, Shin-Ya Nishio, Javier Gavilán, Aanand Acharya, Abdulrahman Hagr, Luis Lassaletta, Yongxin Li, S Sudha Maheshwari, Mohan Kameswaran, Thomas Parzefall, Chris Raine, Kristen Rak, Anne Morgan Selleck, Hinrich Staecker, Timo Stöver, Serafima Sugarova, Vedat Topsakal, Vincent Van Rompaey, Griet Mertens, Stefan Volkenstein, Christiane Völter, Wafaa Shehata-Dieler, Mario E Zernotti, Paul Van de Heyning
{"title":"基于人工耳蜗植入中心调查的先天性听力损失基因和病毒病因测试:HEARRING 小组的共识建议和未来方向。","authors":"Shin-Ichi Usami, Shin-Ya Nishio, Javier Gavilán, Aanand Acharya, Abdulrahman Hagr, Luis Lassaletta, Yongxin Li, S Sudha Maheshwari, Mohan Kameswaran, Thomas Parzefall, Chris Raine, Kristen Rak, Anne Morgan Selleck, Hinrich Staecker, Timo Stöver, Serafima Sugarova, Vedat Topsakal, Vincent Van Rompaey, Griet Mertens, Stefan Volkenstein, Christiane Völter, Wafaa Shehata-Dieler, Mario E Zernotti, Paul Van de Heyning","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2414803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss, testing for genetic etiologies and congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection have become common practice.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is to determine which specific testing methodologies should be used and when.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We surveyed 20 practicing otolaryngologists across eighteen institutions in thirteen countries about their approach to cCMV, GJB2, and wider genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 90% of respondents employ all three tests, either in routine or special cases. cCMV testing is widely used, with 95% of respondents incorporating it into their clinical practice. <i>GJB2</i> testing was employed by 90%. In cases with negative <i>GJB2</i> test results, a majority of respondents proceeded to wider genetic screening. Test reimbursement was also examined for each test. For cCMV testing, 63.1% reported reimbursement, 68.4% reported reimbursement for <i>GJB2</i> variant testing and 52.6% reported reimbursement for wider genetic screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>A common approach is to perform cCMV and <i>GJB2</i> testing as the first tests, followed by wider genetic testing. This study offers insight into the prevalence, methodologies, and reimbursement status of these testing methodologies across multiple hearing centers and countries. Current consensus and future directions are described based on the current survey.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing for genetic and viral etiologies in congenital hearing loss based on a survey of cochlear implant centers: proposed HEARRING group consensus and future directions.\",\"authors\":\"Shin-Ichi Usami, Shin-Ya Nishio, Javier Gavilán, Aanand Acharya, Abdulrahman Hagr, Luis Lassaletta, Yongxin Li, S Sudha Maheshwari, Mohan Kameswaran, Thomas Parzefall, Chris Raine, Kristen Rak, Anne Morgan Selleck, Hinrich Staecker, Timo Stöver, Serafima Sugarova, Vedat Topsakal, Vincent Van Rompaey, Griet Mertens, Stefan Volkenstein, Christiane Völter, Wafaa Shehata-Dieler, Mario E Zernotti, Paul Van de Heyning\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2414803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss, testing for genetic etiologies and congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection have become common practice.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is to determine which specific testing methodologies should be used and when.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We surveyed 20 practicing otolaryngologists across eighteen institutions in thirteen countries about their approach to cCMV, GJB2, and wider genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 90% of respondents employ all three tests, either in routine or special cases. cCMV testing is widely used, with 95% of respondents incorporating it into their clinical practice. <i>GJB2</i> testing was employed by 90%. In cases with negative <i>GJB2</i> test results, a majority of respondents proceeded to wider genetic screening. Test reimbursement was also examined for each test. For cCMV testing, 63.1% reported reimbursement, 68.4% reported reimbursement for <i>GJB2</i> variant testing and 52.6% reported reimbursement for wider genetic screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>A common approach is to perform cCMV and <i>GJB2</i> testing as the first tests, followed by wider genetic testing. This study offers insight into the prevalence, methodologies, and reimbursement status of these testing methodologies across multiple hearing centers and countries. Current consensus and future directions are described based on the current survey.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2414803\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2414803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在先天性感音神经性听力损失的病例中,检测遗传病因和先天性巨细胞病毒(cCMV)感染已成为常见做法:本研究的目的是确定应使用哪些特定的检测方法以及何时使用:我们调查了 13 个国家 18 个机构的 20 位耳鼻喉科医生,了解他们对 cCMV、GJB2 和更广泛基因检测的方法:我们发现,90% 的受访者在常规或特殊病例中采用了所有三种检测方法。cCMV 检测被广泛采用,95% 的受访者将其纳入临床实践。90%的受访者采用了 GJB2 检测。对于 GJB2 检测结果为阴性的病例,大多数受访者会继续进行更广泛的基因筛查。还对每种检测的费用报销情况进行了调查。63.1%的受访者表示 cCMV 检测可以报销,68.4%的受访者表示 GJB2 变异检测可以报销,52.6%的受访者表示更广泛的基因筛查可以报销:常见的方法是首先进行 cCMV 和 GJB2 检测,然后再进行更广泛的基因检测。本研究深入探讨了这些检测方法在多个听力中心和国家的流行程度、方法和报销情况。根据目前的调查描述了目前的共识和未来的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing for genetic and viral etiologies in congenital hearing loss based on a survey of cochlear implant centers: proposed HEARRING group consensus and future directions.

Background: In cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss, testing for genetic etiologies and congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection have become common practice.

Aims/objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine which specific testing methodologies should be used and when.

Material and methods: We surveyed 20 practicing otolaryngologists across eighteen institutions in thirteen countries about their approach to cCMV, GJB2, and wider genetic testing.

Results: We found 90% of respondents employ all three tests, either in routine or special cases. cCMV testing is widely used, with 95% of respondents incorporating it into their clinical practice. GJB2 testing was employed by 90%. In cases with negative GJB2 test results, a majority of respondents proceeded to wider genetic screening. Test reimbursement was also examined for each test. For cCMV testing, 63.1% reported reimbursement, 68.4% reported reimbursement for GJB2 variant testing and 52.6% reported reimbursement for wider genetic screening.

Conclusions and significance: A common approach is to perform cCMV and GJB2 testing as the first tests, followed by wider genetic testing. This study offers insight into the prevalence, methodologies, and reimbursement status of these testing methodologies across multiple hearing centers and countries. Current consensus and future directions are described based on the current survey.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信