关于新石器时代圆形围屋的新研究

IF 1.9 2区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Antiquity Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.15184/aqy.2024.162
François Bertemes
{"title":"关于新石器时代圆形围屋的新研究","authors":"François Bertemes","doi":"10.15184/aqy.2024.162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Today, Neolithic circular enclosures are generally regarded as evidence of the first monumental architecture in Europe. They are undoubtedly a topical subject in Neolithic research and also attract great interest from a broader audience. This has not always been the case. Just over 40 years ago, the few examples known then, mainly from Bavaria and Bohemia, were regarded as exotic and of no particular importance for the cultural-historical assessment of early farming societies in Europe. Thanks to aerial archaeology, the number of known sites increased rapidly in the 1970s and 1980s in Bavaria and Lower Austria. This has also been the case, since the 1990s, in East Germany and other countries of the former Eastern Bloc when political change made systematic prospecting flights possible. In addition, the development of geophysical prospection methods provided new insights into the structure and landscapes into which the enclosures were embedded. Finally, the increasing number of rescue excavations and large-scale scientific excavations have contributed to a better understanding of such sites as a characteristic component of Middle Neolithic societies in Central Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":8058,"journal":{"name":"Antiquity","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New research on Neolithic circular enclosures\",\"authors\":\"François Bertemes\",\"doi\":\"10.15184/aqy.2024.162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Today, Neolithic circular enclosures are generally regarded as evidence of the first monumental architecture in Europe. They are undoubtedly a topical subject in Neolithic research and also attract great interest from a broader audience. This has not always been the case. Just over 40 years ago, the few examples known then, mainly from Bavaria and Bohemia, were regarded as exotic and of no particular importance for the cultural-historical assessment of early farming societies in Europe. Thanks to aerial archaeology, the number of known sites increased rapidly in the 1970s and 1980s in Bavaria and Lower Austria. This has also been the case, since the 1990s, in East Germany and other countries of the former Eastern Bloc when political change made systematic prospecting flights possible. In addition, the development of geophysical prospection methods provided new insights into the structure and landscapes into which the enclosures were embedded. Finally, the increasing number of rescue excavations and large-scale scientific excavations have contributed to a better understanding of such sites as a characteristic component of Middle Neolithic societies in Central Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiquity\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiquity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.162\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,新石器时代的圆形围墙被普遍认为是欧洲最早的纪念性建筑的证据。它们无疑是新石器时代研究的热门话题,也吸引了更多人的兴趣。但情况并非总是如此。就在 40 多年前,当时已知的主要来自巴伐利亚和波希米亚的少数实例还被视为异国情调,对于欧洲早期农耕社会的文化史评估并无特别重要的意义。在航空考古的帮助下,巴伐利亚和下奥地利已知遗址的数量在 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代迅速增加。自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,东德和前东欧集团其他国家的情况也是如此,因为政治变革使得系统的勘探飞行成为可能。此外,地球物理勘探方法的发展为了解圈地的结构和地貌提供了新的视角。最后,越来越多的抢救性发掘和大规模科学发掘有助于更好地了解此类遗址作为中欧新石器时代中期社会特色组成部分的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New research on Neolithic circular enclosures

Today, Neolithic circular enclosures are generally regarded as evidence of the first monumental architecture in Europe. They are undoubtedly a topical subject in Neolithic research and also attract great interest from a broader audience. This has not always been the case. Just over 40 years ago, the few examples known then, mainly from Bavaria and Bohemia, were regarded as exotic and of no particular importance for the cultural-historical assessment of early farming societies in Europe. Thanks to aerial archaeology, the number of known sites increased rapidly in the 1970s and 1980s in Bavaria and Lower Austria. This has also been the case, since the 1990s, in East Germany and other countries of the former Eastern Bloc when political change made systematic prospecting flights possible. In addition, the development of geophysical prospection methods provided new insights into the structure and landscapes into which the enclosures were embedded. Finally, the increasing number of rescue excavations and large-scale scientific excavations have contributed to a better understanding of such sites as a characteristic component of Middle Neolithic societies in Central Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antiquity
Antiquity Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
149
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信